Cargando…

A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index

The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamidi, Jamal, Frainais, Christophe, Amar, Edouard, Bailly, Eric, Clément, Patrice, Ménézo, Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288
_version_ 1782381061053874176
author Hamidi, Jamal
Frainais, Christophe
Amar, Edouard
Bailly, Eric
Clément, Patrice
Ménézo, Yves
author_facet Hamidi, Jamal
Frainais, Christophe
Amar, Edouard
Bailly, Eric
Clément, Patrice
Ménézo, Yves
author_sort Hamidi, Jamal
collection PubMed
description The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on the quality of the conceptus is now emerging. In this article we have compared in situ analyses with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) (for DNA fragmentation) with aniline blue (AB) (for nucleus decondensation), versus flow cytometry (FC) after acridine orange staining, in a double-blinded analysis. In our hands, TUNEL and acridine orange give perfectly comparable results. For decondensation the results are also comparable, but the double-stranded green fluorescence obtained with acridine orange seems to slightly underestimate the decondensation status obtained with AB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45013732015-07-15 A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index Hamidi, Jamal Frainais, Christophe Amar, Edouard Bailly, Eric Clément, Patrice Ménézo, Yves Zygote Research Article The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on the quality of the conceptus is now emerging. In this article we have compared in situ analyses with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) (for DNA fragmentation) with aniline blue (AB) (for nucleus decondensation), versus flow cytometry (FC) after acridine orange staining, in a double-blinded analysis. In our hands, TUNEL and acridine orange give perfectly comparable results. For decondensation the results are also comparable, but the double-stranded green fluorescence obtained with acridine orange seems to slightly underestimate the decondensation status obtained with AB. Cambridge University Press 2015-08 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4501373/ /pubmed/24988915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamidi, Jamal
Frainais, Christophe
Amar, Edouard
Bailly, Eric
Clément, Patrice
Ménézo, Yves
A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title_full A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title_fullStr A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title_full_unstemmed A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title_short A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
title_sort double-blinded comparison of in situ tunel and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm dna fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidijamal adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT frainaischristophe adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT amaredouard adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT baillyeric adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT clementpatrice adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT menezoyves adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT hamidijamal doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT frainaischristophe doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT amaredouard doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT baillyeric doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT clementpatrice doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex
AT menezoyves doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex