Cargando…
A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index
The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288 |
_version_ | 1782381061053874176 |
---|---|
author | Hamidi, Jamal Frainais, Christophe Amar, Edouard Bailly, Eric Clément, Patrice Ménézo, Yves |
author_facet | Hamidi, Jamal Frainais, Christophe Amar, Edouard Bailly, Eric Clément, Patrice Ménézo, Yves |
author_sort | Hamidi, Jamal |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on the quality of the conceptus is now emerging. In this article we have compared in situ analyses with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) (for DNA fragmentation) with aniline blue (AB) (for nucleus decondensation), versus flow cytometry (FC) after acridine orange staining, in a double-blinded analysis. In our hands, TUNEL and acridine orange give perfectly comparable results. For decondensation the results are also comparable, but the double-stranded green fluorescence obtained with acridine orange seems to slightly underestimate the decondensation status obtained with AB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4501373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45013732015-07-15 A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index Hamidi, Jamal Frainais, Christophe Amar, Edouard Bailly, Eric Clément, Patrice Ménézo, Yves Zygote Research Article The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on assisted reproductive technology (ART) successes, in terms of outcome, is now established. High levels of DNA strand breaks severely affect the probability of pregnancy. The importance of sperm nucleus condensation in early embryogenesis and, subsequently, on the quality of the conceptus is now emerging. In this article we have compared in situ analyses with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) (for DNA fragmentation) with aniline blue (AB) (for nucleus decondensation), versus flow cytometry (FC) after acridine orange staining, in a double-blinded analysis. In our hands, TUNEL and acridine orange give perfectly comparable results. For decondensation the results are also comparable, but the double-stranded green fluorescence obtained with acridine orange seems to slightly underestimate the decondensation status obtained with AB. Cambridge University Press 2015-08 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4501373/ /pubmed/24988915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hamidi, Jamal Frainais, Christophe Amar, Edouard Bailly, Eric Clément, Patrice Ménézo, Yves A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title | A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title_full | A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title_fullStr | A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title_full_unstemmed | A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title_short | A double-blinded comparison of in situ TUNEL and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
title_sort | double-blinded comparison of in situ tunel and aniline blue versus flow cytometry acridine orange for the determination of sperm dna fragmentation and nucleus decondensation state index |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199414000288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamidijamal adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT frainaischristophe adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT amaredouard adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT baillyeric adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT clementpatrice adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT menezoyves adoubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT hamidijamal doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT frainaischristophe doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT amaredouard doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT baillyeric doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT clementpatrice doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex AT menezoyves doubleblindedcomparisonofinsitutunelandanilineblueversusflowcytometryacridineorangeforthedeterminationofspermdnafragmentationandnucleusdecondensationstateindex |