Cargando…

Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Degener, Carolin Marlen, de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira, Roque, Rosemary Aparecida, Rösner, Susanne, Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira, Kroon, Erna Geessien, Codeço, Cláudia Torres, Nobre, Aline Araújo, Ohly, Jörg Johannes, Geier, Martin, Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374
_version_ 1782381065115009024
author Degener, Carolin Marlen
de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira
Roque, Rosemary Aparecida
Rösner, Susanne
Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira
Kroon, Erna Geessien
Codeço, Cláudia Torres
Nobre, Aline Araújo
Ohly, Jörg Johannes
Geier, Martin
Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo
author_facet Degener, Carolin Marlen
de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira
Roque, Rosemary Aparecida
Rösner, Susanne
Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira
Kroon, Erna Geessien
Codeço, Cláudia Torres
Nobre, Aline Araújo
Ohly, Jörg Johannes
Geier, Martin
Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo
author_sort Degener, Carolin Marlen
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti abundance with BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps in six clusters, three clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention arm where each participating household received three MQTs for mass trapping during 17 months. The remaining three clusters (control arm) did not receive traps. The effect of mass trapping on adult Ae. aegypti abundance was monitored fortnightly with BGS traps. During the last two months of the study, a serological survey was conducted. After the study, a second questionnaire was applied in the intervention arm. Entomological monitoring indicated that MQT mass trapping did not reduce adult Ae. aegypti abundance. The serological survey indicated that recent dengue infections were equally frequent in the intervention and the control arm. Most participants responded positively to questions concerning user satisfaction. According to the results, there is no evidence that mass trapping with MQTs can be used as a part of dengue control programs. The use of this sticky trap is only recommendable for dengue vector monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45014162015-07-16 Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance Degener, Carolin Marlen de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira Roque, Rosemary Aparecida Rösner, Susanne Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira Kroon, Erna Geessien Codeço, Cláudia Torres Nobre, Aline Araújo Ohly, Jörg Johannes Geier, Martin Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Articles The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti abundance with BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps in six clusters, three clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention arm where each participating household received three MQTs for mass trapping during 17 months. The remaining three clusters (control arm) did not receive traps. The effect of mass trapping on adult Ae. aegypti abundance was monitored fortnightly with BGS traps. During the last two months of the study, a serological survey was conducted. After the study, a second questionnaire was applied in the intervention arm. Entomological monitoring indicated that MQT mass trapping did not reduce adult Ae. aegypti abundance. The serological survey indicated that recent dengue infections were equally frequent in the intervention and the control arm. Most participants responded positively to questions concerning user satisfaction. According to the results, there is no evidence that mass trapping with MQTs can be used as a part of dengue control programs. The use of this sticky trap is only recommendable for dengue vector monitoring. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4501416/ /pubmed/25946154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Degener, Carolin Marlen
de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira
Roque, Rosemary Aparecida
Rösner, Susanne
Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira
Kroon, Erna Geessien
Codeço, Cláudia Torres
Nobre, Aline Araújo
Ohly, Jörg Johannes
Geier, Martin
Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo
Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title_full Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title_fullStr Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title_full_unstemmed Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title_short Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
title_sort mass trapping with mosquitraps does not reduce aedes aegypti abundance
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374
work_keys_str_mv AT degenercarolinmarlen masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT deazaratatianamingoteferreira masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT roquerosemaryaparecida masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT rosnersusanne masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT rochaeliseusoaresoliveira masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT kroonernageessien masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT codecoclaudiatorres masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT nobrealinearaujo masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT ohlyjorgjohannes masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT geiermartin masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance
AT eirasalvaroeduardo masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance