Cargando…
Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti ab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374 |
_version_ | 1782381065115009024 |
---|---|
author | Degener, Carolin Marlen de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira Roque, Rosemary Aparecida Rösner, Susanne Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira Kroon, Erna Geessien Codeço, Cláudia Torres Nobre, Aline Araújo Ohly, Jörg Johannes Geier, Martin Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo |
author_facet | Degener, Carolin Marlen de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira Roque, Rosemary Aparecida Rösner, Susanne Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira Kroon, Erna Geessien Codeço, Cláudia Torres Nobre, Aline Araújo Ohly, Jörg Johannes Geier, Martin Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo |
author_sort | Degener, Carolin Marlen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti abundance with BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps in six clusters, three clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention arm where each participating household received three MQTs for mass trapping during 17 months. The remaining three clusters (control arm) did not receive traps. The effect of mass trapping on adult Ae. aegypti abundance was monitored fortnightly with BGS traps. During the last two months of the study, a serological survey was conducted. After the study, a second questionnaire was applied in the intervention arm. Entomological monitoring indicated that MQT mass trapping did not reduce adult Ae. aegypti abundance. The serological survey indicated that recent dengue infections were equally frequent in the intervention and the control arm. Most participants responded positively to questions concerning user satisfaction. According to the results, there is no evidence that mass trapping with MQTs can be used as a part of dengue control programs. The use of this sticky trap is only recommendable for dengue vector monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4501416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45014162015-07-16 Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance Degener, Carolin Marlen de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira Roque, Rosemary Aparecida Rösner, Susanne Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira Kroon, Erna Geessien Codeço, Cláudia Torres Nobre, Aline Araújo Ohly, Jörg Johannes Geier, Martin Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Articles The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Aedes aegypti mass trapping using the sticky trap MosquiTRAP (MQT) by performing a cluster randomised controlled trial in Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil. After an initial questionnaire and baseline monitoring of adult Ae. aegypti abundance with BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps in six clusters, three clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention arm where each participating household received three MQTs for mass trapping during 17 months. The remaining three clusters (control arm) did not receive traps. The effect of mass trapping on adult Ae. aegypti abundance was monitored fortnightly with BGS traps. During the last two months of the study, a serological survey was conducted. After the study, a second questionnaire was applied in the intervention arm. Entomological monitoring indicated that MQT mass trapping did not reduce adult Ae. aegypti abundance. The serological survey indicated that recent dengue infections were equally frequent in the intervention and the control arm. Most participants responded positively to questions concerning user satisfaction. According to the results, there is no evidence that mass trapping with MQTs can be used as a part of dengue control programs. The use of this sticky trap is only recommendable for dengue vector monitoring. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4501416/ /pubmed/25946154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Degener, Carolin Marlen de Ázara, Tatiana Mingote Ferreira Roque, Rosemary Aparecida Rösner, Susanne Rocha, Eliseu Soares Oliveira Kroon, Erna Geessien Codeço, Cláudia Torres Nobre, Aline Araújo Ohly, Jörg Johannes Geier, Martin Eiras, Álvaro Eduardo Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes aegypti abundance |
title | Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes
aegypti abundance |
title_full | Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes
aegypti abundance |
title_fullStr | Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes
aegypti abundance |
title_full_unstemmed | Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes
aegypti abundance |
title_short | Mass trapping with MosquiTRAPs does not reduce Aedes
aegypti abundance |
title_sort | mass trapping with mosquitraps does not reduce aedes
aegypti abundance |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760140374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degenercarolinmarlen masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT deazaratatianamingoteferreira masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT roquerosemaryaparecida masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT rosnersusanne masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT rochaeliseusoaresoliveira masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT kroonernageessien masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT codecoclaudiatorres masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT nobrealinearaujo masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT ohlyjorgjohannes masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT geiermartin masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance AT eirasalvaroeduardo masstrappingwithmosquitrapsdoesnotreduceaedesaegyptiabundance |