Cargando…

Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients

BACKGROUND: Poor inhalation techniques are associated with decreased medication delivery and poor disease control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in COPD patients. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pothirat, Chaicharn, Chaiwong, Warawut, Phetsuk, Nittaya, Pisalthanapuna, Sangnual, Chetsadaphan, Nonglak, Choomuang, Woranoot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185435
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S85681
_version_ 1782381071273295872
author Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chaiwong, Warawut
Phetsuk, Nittaya
Pisalthanapuna, Sangnual
Chetsadaphan, Nonglak
Choomuang, Woranoot
author_facet Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chaiwong, Warawut
Phetsuk, Nittaya
Pisalthanapuna, Sangnual
Chetsadaphan, Nonglak
Choomuang, Woranoot
author_sort Pothirat, Chaicharn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor inhalation techniques are associated with decreased medication delivery and poor disease control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in COPD patients. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess patient compliance with correct techniques for using inhaler devices across four regimens, ie, the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), the pMDI with a spacer, the Accuhaler(®), and the Handihaler(®). The percentage of compliance with essential steps of correct device usage for each regimen was recorded without prior notification when COPD patients presented for a routine visit, and 1 month after receiving face-to-face training. We compared the percentage of compliance between the devices and risk factors related to incorrect techniques using logistic regression analysis. Percentage of patient compliance with correct techniques was compared between the two visits using the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 103 COPD patients (mean age 71.2±9.2 years, males 64.1%, low education level 82.5%, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second 51.9±22.5) were evaluated. Seventy-seven patients (74.8%) performed at least one step incorrectly. Patients using the Handihaler had the lowest compliance failure (42.5%), and the odds ratio for failure with the other devices compared with the Handihaler were 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–11.8) for the pMDI, 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–8.2) for the pMDI with a spacer, and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1–5.2) for the Accuhaler. Low education level was the single most important factor related to incorrect technique (adjusted odds ratio 4.1, 95% CI 1.2–13.4, P=0.022). Formal training resulted in a statistically significant decrease in percentage of incorrect techniques for all devices and for the pMDI (59.4% vs 48.6%, P<0.001; 72.4% vs 48.3%, P=0.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inhalation technique in COPD patients without face-to-face training was mostly unsatisfactory, especially in patients with low education levels. The Handihaler was the inhaler device associated with the lowest technique failure. Face-to-face inhalation technique training significantly increased technique compliance for the pMDI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45014462015-07-16 Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients Pothirat, Chaicharn Chaiwong, Warawut Phetsuk, Nittaya Pisalthanapuna, Sangnual Chetsadaphan, Nonglak Choomuang, Woranoot Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Poor inhalation techniques are associated with decreased medication delivery and poor disease control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in COPD patients. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess patient compliance with correct techniques for using inhaler devices across four regimens, ie, the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), the pMDI with a spacer, the Accuhaler(®), and the Handihaler(®). The percentage of compliance with essential steps of correct device usage for each regimen was recorded without prior notification when COPD patients presented for a routine visit, and 1 month after receiving face-to-face training. We compared the percentage of compliance between the devices and risk factors related to incorrect techniques using logistic regression analysis. Percentage of patient compliance with correct techniques was compared between the two visits using the chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 103 COPD patients (mean age 71.2±9.2 years, males 64.1%, low education level 82.5%, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second 51.9±22.5) were evaluated. Seventy-seven patients (74.8%) performed at least one step incorrectly. Patients using the Handihaler had the lowest compliance failure (42.5%), and the odds ratio for failure with the other devices compared with the Handihaler were 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8–11.8) for the pMDI, 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–8.2) for the pMDI with a spacer, and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1–5.2) for the Accuhaler. Low education level was the single most important factor related to incorrect technique (adjusted odds ratio 4.1, 95% CI 1.2–13.4, P=0.022). Formal training resulted in a statistically significant decrease in percentage of incorrect techniques for all devices and for the pMDI (59.4% vs 48.6%, P<0.001; 72.4% vs 48.3%, P=0.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inhalation technique in COPD patients without face-to-face training was mostly unsatisfactory, especially in patients with low education levels. The Handihaler was the inhaler device associated with the lowest technique failure. Face-to-face inhalation technique training significantly increased technique compliance for the pMDI. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4501446/ /pubmed/26185435 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S85681 Text en © 2015 Pothirat et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Chaiwong, Warawut
Phetsuk, Nittaya
Pisalthanapuna, Sangnual
Chetsadaphan, Nonglak
Choomuang, Woranoot
Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title_full Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title_fullStr Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title_short Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients
title_sort evaluating inhaler use technique in copd patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26185435
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S85681
work_keys_str_mv AT pothiratchaicharn evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients
AT chaiwongwarawut evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients
AT phetsuknittaya evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients
AT pisalthanapunasangnual evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients
AT chetsadaphannonglak evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients
AT choomuangworanoot evaluatinginhalerusetechniqueincopdpatients