Cargando…

Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients

Distinguishing between patients with early stage, screen detected prostate cancer who must be treated from those that can be safely watched has become a major issue in prostate cancer care. Identification of molecular subtypes of prostate cancer has opened the opportunity for testing whether biomark...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brooks, James D., Wei, Wei, Hawley, Sarah, Auman, Heidi, Newcomb, Lisa, Boyer, Hilary, Fazli, Ladan, Simko, Jeff, Hurtado-Coll, Antonio, Troyer, Dean A., Carroll, Peter R., Gleave, Martin, Lance, Raymond, Lin, Daniel W., Nelson, Peter S., Thompson, Ian M., True, Lawrence D., Feng, Ziding, McKenney, Jesse K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132343
_version_ 1782381108784005120
author Brooks, James D.
Wei, Wei
Hawley, Sarah
Auman, Heidi
Newcomb, Lisa
Boyer, Hilary
Fazli, Ladan
Simko, Jeff
Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
Troyer, Dean A.
Carroll, Peter R.
Gleave, Martin
Lance, Raymond
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Thompson, Ian M.
True, Lawrence D.
Feng, Ziding
McKenney, Jesse K.
author_facet Brooks, James D.
Wei, Wei
Hawley, Sarah
Auman, Heidi
Newcomb, Lisa
Boyer, Hilary
Fazli, Ladan
Simko, Jeff
Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
Troyer, Dean A.
Carroll, Peter R.
Gleave, Martin
Lance, Raymond
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Thompson, Ian M.
True, Lawrence D.
Feng, Ziding
McKenney, Jesse K.
author_sort Brooks, James D.
collection PubMed
description Distinguishing between patients with early stage, screen detected prostate cancer who must be treated from those that can be safely watched has become a major issue in prostate cancer care. Identification of molecular subtypes of prostate cancer has opened the opportunity for testing whether biomarkers that characterize these subtypes can be used as biomarkers of prognosis. Two established molecular subtypes are identified by high expression of the ERG oncoprotein, due to structural DNA alterations that encode for fusion transcripts in approximately ½ of prostate cancers, and over-expression of SPINK1, which is purportedly found only in ERG-negative tumors. We used a multi-institutional prostate cancer tissue microarray constructed from radical prostatectomy samples with associated detailed clinical data and with rigorous selection of recurrent and non-recurrent cases to test the prognostic value of immunohistochemistry staining results for the ERG and SPINK1 proteins. In univariate analysis, ERG positive cases (419/1067; 39%) were associated with lower patient age, pre-operative serum PSA levels, lower Gleason scores (≤3+4=7) and improved recurrence free survival (RFS). On multivariate analysis, ERG status was not correlated with RFS, disease specific survival (DSS) or overall survival (OS). High-level SPINK1 protein expression (33/1067 cases; 3%) was associated with improved RFS on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Over-expression of either protein was not associated with clinical outcome. While expression of ERG and SPINK1 proteins was inversely correlated, it was not mutually exclusive since 3 (0.28%) cases showed high expression of both. While ERG and SPINK1 appear to identify discrete molecular subtypes of prostate cancer, only high expression of SPINK1 was associated with improved clinical outcome. However, by themselves, neither ERG nor SPINK1 appear to be useful biomarkers for prognostication of early stage prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45017232015-07-17 Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients Brooks, James D. Wei, Wei Hawley, Sarah Auman, Heidi Newcomb, Lisa Boyer, Hilary Fazli, Ladan Simko, Jeff Hurtado-Coll, Antonio Troyer, Dean A. Carroll, Peter R. Gleave, Martin Lance, Raymond Lin, Daniel W. Nelson, Peter S. Thompson, Ian M. True, Lawrence D. Feng, Ziding McKenney, Jesse K. PLoS One Research Article Distinguishing between patients with early stage, screen detected prostate cancer who must be treated from those that can be safely watched has become a major issue in prostate cancer care. Identification of molecular subtypes of prostate cancer has opened the opportunity for testing whether biomarkers that characterize these subtypes can be used as biomarkers of prognosis. Two established molecular subtypes are identified by high expression of the ERG oncoprotein, due to structural DNA alterations that encode for fusion transcripts in approximately ½ of prostate cancers, and over-expression of SPINK1, which is purportedly found only in ERG-negative tumors. We used a multi-institutional prostate cancer tissue microarray constructed from radical prostatectomy samples with associated detailed clinical data and with rigorous selection of recurrent and non-recurrent cases to test the prognostic value of immunohistochemistry staining results for the ERG and SPINK1 proteins. In univariate analysis, ERG positive cases (419/1067; 39%) were associated with lower patient age, pre-operative serum PSA levels, lower Gleason scores (≤3+4=7) and improved recurrence free survival (RFS). On multivariate analysis, ERG status was not correlated with RFS, disease specific survival (DSS) or overall survival (OS). High-level SPINK1 protein expression (33/1067 cases; 3%) was associated with improved RFS on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Over-expression of either protein was not associated with clinical outcome. While expression of ERG and SPINK1 proteins was inversely correlated, it was not mutually exclusive since 3 (0.28%) cases showed high expression of both. While ERG and SPINK1 appear to identify discrete molecular subtypes of prostate cancer, only high expression of SPINK1 was associated with improved clinical outcome. However, by themselves, neither ERG nor SPINK1 appear to be useful biomarkers for prognostication of early stage prostate cancer. Public Library of Science 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4501723/ /pubmed/26172920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132343 Text en © 2015 Brooks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brooks, James D.
Wei, Wei
Hawley, Sarah
Auman, Heidi
Newcomb, Lisa
Boyer, Hilary
Fazli, Ladan
Simko, Jeff
Hurtado-Coll, Antonio
Troyer, Dean A.
Carroll, Peter R.
Gleave, Martin
Lance, Raymond
Lin, Daniel W.
Nelson, Peter S.
Thompson, Ian M.
True, Lawrence D.
Feng, Ziding
McKenney, Jesse K.
Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title_full Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title_short Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients
title_sort evaluation of erg and spink1 by immunohistochemical staining and clinicopathological outcomes in a multi-institutional radical prostatectomy cohort of 1067 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132343
work_keys_str_mv AT brooksjamesd evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT weiwei evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT hawleysarah evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT aumanheidi evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT newcomblisa evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT boyerhilary evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT fazliladan evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT simkojeff evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT hurtadocollantonio evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT troyerdeana evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT carrollpeterr evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT gleavemartin evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT lanceraymond evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT lindanielw evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT nelsonpeters evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT thompsonianm evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT truelawrenced evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT fengziding evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients
AT mckenneyjessek evaluationofergandspink1byimmunohistochemicalstainingandclinicopathologicaloutcomesinamultiinstitutionalradicalprostatectomycohortof1067patients