Cargando…

A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and networ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Jeffrey L., Cogbill, Elizabeth, Santana-Davila, Rafael, Eldredge, Christina, Collier, William, Gradall, Andrew, Sehgal, Neha, Kuester, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733
_version_ 1782381112236965888
author Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Cogbill, Elizabeth
Santana-Davila, Rafael
Eldredge, Christina
Collier, William
Gradall, Andrew
Sehgal, Neha
Kuester, Jessica
author_facet Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Cogbill, Elizabeth
Santana-Davila, Rafael
Eldredge, Christina
Collier, William
Gradall, Andrew
Sehgal, Neha
Kuester, Jessica
author_sort Jackson, Jeffrey L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. DATA SOURCES: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. RESULTS: Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. CONCLUSION: Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline’s superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4501738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45017382015-07-17 A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache Jackson, Jeffrey L. Cogbill, Elizabeth Santana-Davila, Rafael Eldredge, Christina Collier, William Gradall, Andrew Sehgal, Neha Kuester, Jessica PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. DATA SOURCES: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. RESULTS: Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. CONCLUSION: Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline’s superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles. Public Library of Science 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4501738/ /pubmed/26172390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jackson, Jeffrey L.
Cogbill, Elizabeth
Santana-Davila, Rafael
Eldredge, Christina
Collier, William
Gradall, Andrew
Sehgal, Neha
Kuester, Jessica
A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title_full A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title_fullStr A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title_short A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
title_sort comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of drugs for the prophylaxis of migraine headache
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonjeffreyl acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT cogbillelizabeth acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT santanadavilarafael acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT eldredgechristina acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT collierwilliam acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT gradallandrew acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT sehgalneha acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT kuesterjessica acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT jacksonjeffreyl comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT cogbillelizabeth comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT santanadavilarafael comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT eldredgechristina comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT collierwilliam comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT gradallandrew comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT sehgalneha comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache
AT kuesterjessica comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache