Cargando…
A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and networ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733 |
_version_ | 1782381112236965888 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Jeffrey L. Cogbill, Elizabeth Santana-Davila, Rafael Eldredge, Christina Collier, William Gradall, Andrew Sehgal, Neha Kuester, Jessica |
author_facet | Jackson, Jeffrey L. Cogbill, Elizabeth Santana-Davila, Rafael Eldredge, Christina Collier, William Gradall, Andrew Sehgal, Neha Kuester, Jessica |
author_sort | Jackson, Jeffrey L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. DATA SOURCES: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. RESULTS: Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. CONCLUSION: Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline’s superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4501738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45017382015-07-17 A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache Jackson, Jeffrey L. Cogbill, Elizabeth Santana-Davila, Rafael Eldredge, Christina Collier, William Gradall, Andrew Sehgal, Neha Kuester, Jessica PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of migraine prophylactic medications. DESIGN: We performed a network meta-analysis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate and quality was assessed using both the JADAD and Cochrane Risk of Bias instruments. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis performed using random effects models. DATA SOURCES: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Trial Registry, bibliography of retrieved articles through 18 May 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included randomized controlled trials of adults with migraine headaches of at least 4 weeks in duration. RESULTS: Placebo controlled trials included alpha blockers (n = 9), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 3), angiotensin receptor blockers (n = 3), anticonvulsants (n = 32), beta-blockers (n = 39), calcium channel blockers (n = 12), flunarizine (n = 7), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (n = 6), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (n = 1) serotonin agonists (n = 9) and tricyclic antidepressants (n = 11). In addition there were 53 trials comparing different drugs. Drugs with at least 3 trials that were more effective than placebo for episodic migraines included amitriptyline (SMD: -1.2, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.82), -flunarizine (-1.1 headaches/month (ha/month), 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.67), fluoxetine (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.97 to -0.17), metoprolol (-0.94 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.4 to -0.46), pizotifen (-0.43 ha/month, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.21), propranolol (-1.3 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.62), topiramate (-1.1 ha/month, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.73) and valproate (-1.5 ha/month, 95% CI: -2.1 to -0.8). Several effective drugs with less than 3 trials included: 3 ace inhibitors (enalapril, lisinopril, captopril), two angiotensin receptor blockers (candesartan, telmisartan), two anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, levetiracetam), and several beta-blockers (atenolol, bisoprolol, timolol). Network meta-analysis found amitriptyline to be better than several other medications including candesartan, fluoxetine, propranolol, topiramate and valproate and no different than atenolol, flunarizine, clomipramine or metoprolol. CONCLUSION: Several drugs good evidence supporting efficacy. There is weak evidence supporting amitriptyline’s superiority over some drugs. Selection of prophylactic medication should be tailored according to patient preferences, characteristics and side effect profiles. Public Library of Science 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4501738/ /pubmed/26172390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jackson, Jeffrey L. Cogbill, Elizabeth Santana-Davila, Rafael Eldredge, Christina Collier, William Gradall, Andrew Sehgal, Neha Kuester, Jessica A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title | A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title_full | A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title_short | A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of drugs for the prophylaxis of migraine headache |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4501738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26172390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksonjeffreyl acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT cogbillelizabeth acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT santanadavilarafael acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT eldredgechristina acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT collierwilliam acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT gradallandrew acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT sehgalneha acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT kuesterjessica acomparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT jacksonjeffreyl comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT cogbillelizabeth comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT santanadavilarafael comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT eldredgechristina comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT collierwilliam comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT gradallandrew comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT sehgalneha comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache AT kuesterjessica comparativeeffectivenessmetaanalysisofdrugsfortheprophylaxisofmigraineheadache |