Cargando…

The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy

Due to increasing resistance of pathogens toward standard antimicrobial procedures, alternative approaches that are capable of inactivating pathogens are necessary in support of regular modalities. In this instance, the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria (PIB) may be a promising alternative. For...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cieplik, Fabian, Pummer, Andreas, Regensburger, Johannes, Hiller, Karl-Anton, Späth, Andreas, Tabenski, Laura, Buchalla, Wolfgang, Maisch, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00706
_version_ 1782381233652629504
author Cieplik, Fabian
Pummer, Andreas
Regensburger, Johannes
Hiller, Karl-Anton
Späth, Andreas
Tabenski, Laura
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
author_facet Cieplik, Fabian
Pummer, Andreas
Regensburger, Johannes
Hiller, Karl-Anton
Späth, Andreas
Tabenski, Laura
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
author_sort Cieplik, Fabian
collection PubMed
description Due to increasing resistance of pathogens toward standard antimicrobial procedures, alternative approaches that are capable of inactivating pathogens are necessary in support of regular modalities. In this instance, the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria (PIB) may be a promising alternative. For clinical application of PIB it is essential to ensure appropriate comparison of given photosensitizer (PS)-light source systems, which is complicated by distinct absorption and emission characteristics of given PS and their corresponding light sources, respectively. Consequently, in the present study two strategies for adjustment of irradiation parameters were evaluated: (i) matching energy doses applied by respective light sources (common practice) and (ii) by development and application of a formula for adjusting the numbers of photons absorbed by PS upon irradiation by their corresponding light sources. Since according to the photodynamic principle one PS molecule is excited by the absorption of one photon, this formula allows comparison of photodynamic efficacy of distinct PS per excited molecule. In light of this, the antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy of recently developed PS SAPYR was compared to that of clinical standard PS Methylene Blue (MB) regarding inactivation of monospecies biofilms formed by Enterococcus faecalis and Actinomyces naeslundii whereby evaluating both adjustment strategies. PIB with SAPYR exhibited CFU-reductions of 5.1 log(10) and 6.5 log(10) against E. faecalis and A. naeslundii, respectively, which is declared as a disinfectant efficacy. In contrast, the effect of PIB with MB was smaller when the applied energy dose was adjusted compared to SAPYR (CFU-reductions of 3.4 log(10) and 4.2 log(10) against E. faecalis and A. naeslundii), or there was even no effect at all when the number of absorbed photons was adjusted compared to SAPYR. Since adjusting the numbers of absorbed photons is the more precise and adequate method from a photophysical point of view, this strategy should be considered in further studies when antimicrobial efficacy rates of distinct PS-light source systems are compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4502582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45025822015-07-31 The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy Cieplik, Fabian Pummer, Andreas Regensburger, Johannes Hiller, Karl-Anton Späth, Andreas Tabenski, Laura Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Front Microbiol Microbiology Due to increasing resistance of pathogens toward standard antimicrobial procedures, alternative approaches that are capable of inactivating pathogens are necessary in support of regular modalities. In this instance, the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria (PIB) may be a promising alternative. For clinical application of PIB it is essential to ensure appropriate comparison of given photosensitizer (PS)-light source systems, which is complicated by distinct absorption and emission characteristics of given PS and their corresponding light sources, respectively. Consequently, in the present study two strategies for adjustment of irradiation parameters were evaluated: (i) matching energy doses applied by respective light sources (common practice) and (ii) by development and application of a formula for adjusting the numbers of photons absorbed by PS upon irradiation by their corresponding light sources. Since according to the photodynamic principle one PS molecule is excited by the absorption of one photon, this formula allows comparison of photodynamic efficacy of distinct PS per excited molecule. In light of this, the antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy of recently developed PS SAPYR was compared to that of clinical standard PS Methylene Blue (MB) regarding inactivation of monospecies biofilms formed by Enterococcus faecalis and Actinomyces naeslundii whereby evaluating both adjustment strategies. PIB with SAPYR exhibited CFU-reductions of 5.1 log(10) and 6.5 log(10) against E. faecalis and A. naeslundii, respectively, which is declared as a disinfectant efficacy. In contrast, the effect of PIB with MB was smaller when the applied energy dose was adjusted compared to SAPYR (CFU-reductions of 3.4 log(10) and 4.2 log(10) against E. faecalis and A. naeslundii), or there was even no effect at all when the number of absorbed photons was adjusted compared to SAPYR. Since adjusting the numbers of absorbed photons is the more precise and adequate method from a photophysical point of view, this strategy should be considered in further studies when antimicrobial efficacy rates of distinct PS-light source systems are compared. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4502582/ /pubmed/26236292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00706 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cieplik, Pummer, Regensburger, Hiller, Späth, Tabenski, Buchalla and Maisch. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Cieplik, Fabian
Pummer, Andreas
Regensburger, Johannes
Hiller, Karl-Anton
Späth, Andreas
Tabenski, Laura
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title_full The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title_fullStr The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title_full_unstemmed The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title_short The impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
title_sort impact of absorbed photons on antimicrobial photodynamic efficacy
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00706
work_keys_str_mv AT cieplikfabian theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT pummerandreas theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT regensburgerjohannes theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT hillerkarlanton theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT spathandreas theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT tabenskilaura theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT buchallawolfgang theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT maischtim theimpactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT cieplikfabian impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT pummerandreas impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT regensburgerjohannes impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT hillerkarlanton impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT spathandreas impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT tabenskilaura impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT buchallawolfgang impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy
AT maischtim impactofabsorbedphotonsonantimicrobialphotodynamicefficacy