Cargando…

The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana

AIM: The present study aimed: (1) to evaluate the proportion of each diabetic foot (DF) risk category, according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) consensus, in patients attending the diabetic clinic in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital (SPGH) and (2) to examine some of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tshitenge, Stephane, Ganiyu, Adewale, Mbuka, Deogratias, M. Shama, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS OpenJournals 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.610
_version_ 1782381264373809152
author Tshitenge, Stephane
Ganiyu, Adewale
Mbuka, Deogratias
M. Shama, Joseph
author_facet Tshitenge, Stephane
Ganiyu, Adewale
Mbuka, Deogratias
M. Shama, Joseph
author_sort Tshitenge, Stephane
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study aimed: (1) to evaluate the proportion of each diabetic foot (DF) risk category, according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) consensus, in patients attending the diabetic clinic in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital (SPGH) and (2) to examine some of the factors that may be associated with the progression to higher risk categories such as anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile. METHODS: A retrospective, cross sectional chart review of patients who had attended the diabetic clinic in SPGH from January 2013 to December 2013 was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone a foot examination. Patients with amputation due to accident were excluded. The DF risk category was assessed by determining the proportion of patients in each of four risk categories, as described by the IWGDF consensus. RESULTS: The study encompassed 144 records from patients reviewed for foot examination from January to December 2013. Patients’ ages were between 16 and 85 years, 46 (40%) were male and 98 (60%) were female. The majority (122, [85%]) of patients were in DF risk category 0, whilst a limited number of patients were classified in risk category 1 (10, [6.9%]), risk category 2 (7, [4.9%]) and risk category 3 (5, [3.5%]). Most of the patients had the type 2 diabetes mellitus (139, [97%; 95% CI 92% – 99%]). Patients’ ages were associated with the progressively higher DF risk categories. The adjusted odd ratio was 1.1 (95% CI 1.03-1.14; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that about 15% of patients attending the SPGH diabetic clinic were categorised in higher risk groups for diabetic foot; patients’ ages were linked to the higher DF risk categories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4502878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45028782016-02-03 The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana Tshitenge, Stephane Ganiyu, Adewale Mbuka, Deogratias M. Shama, Joseph Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research AIM: The present study aimed: (1) to evaluate the proportion of each diabetic foot (DF) risk category, according to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) consensus, in patients attending the diabetic clinic in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital (SPGH) and (2) to examine some of the factors that may be associated with the progression to higher risk categories such as anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile. METHODS: A retrospective, cross sectional chart review of patients who had attended the diabetic clinic in SPGH from January 2013 to December 2013 was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone a foot examination. Patients with amputation due to accident were excluded. The DF risk category was assessed by determining the proportion of patients in each of four risk categories, as described by the IWGDF consensus. RESULTS: The study encompassed 144 records from patients reviewed for foot examination from January to December 2013. Patients’ ages were between 16 and 85 years, 46 (40%) were male and 98 (60%) were female. The majority (122, [85%]) of patients were in DF risk category 0, whilst a limited number of patients were classified in risk category 1 (10, [6.9%]), risk category 2 (7, [4.9%]) and risk category 3 (5, [3.5%]). Most of the patients had the type 2 diabetes mellitus (139, [97%; 95% CI 92% – 99%]). Patients’ ages were associated with the progressively higher DF risk categories. The adjusted odd ratio was 1.1 (95% CI 1.03-1.14; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that about 15% of patients attending the SPGH diabetic clinic were categorised in higher risk groups for diabetic foot; patients’ ages were linked to the higher DF risk categories. AOSIS OpenJournals 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4502878/ /pubmed/26245411 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.610 Text en © 2014. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tshitenge, Stephane
Ganiyu, Adewale
Mbuka, Deogratias
M. Shama, Joseph
The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title_full The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title_fullStr The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title_full_unstemmed The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title_short The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
title_sort diabetic foot risks profile in selebi phikwe government hospital, botswana
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4502878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.610
work_keys_str_mv AT tshitengestephane thediabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT ganiyuadewale thediabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT mbukadeogratias thediabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT mshamajoseph thediabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT tshitengestephane diabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT ganiyuadewale diabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT mbukadeogratias diabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana
AT mshamajoseph diabeticfootrisksprofileinselebiphikwegovernmenthospitalbotswana