Cargando…

External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China

In 2014, Ebola hemorrhagic fever broke out in West Africa. As contact between China and West Africa is frequent, the possibility that Ebola virus would enter China was high. Thus, an external assessment of the quality of Ebola virus detection was organized by the National Center for Clinical Laborat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Guojing, Sun, Yu, Zhang, Kuo, Jia, Tingting, Hao, Mingju, Zhang, Dong, Chang, Le, Zhang, Lei, Zhang, Rui, Lin, Guigao, Peng, Rongxue, Li, Jinming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132659
_version_ 1782381304231231488
author Wang, Guojing
Sun, Yu
Zhang, Kuo
Jia, Tingting
Hao, Mingju
Zhang, Dong
Chang, Le
Zhang, Lei
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Guigao
Peng, Rongxue
Li, Jinming
author_facet Wang, Guojing
Sun, Yu
Zhang, Kuo
Jia, Tingting
Hao, Mingju
Zhang, Dong
Chang, Le
Zhang, Lei
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Guigao
Peng, Rongxue
Li, Jinming
author_sort Wang, Guojing
collection PubMed
description In 2014, Ebola hemorrhagic fever broke out in West Africa. As contact between China and West Africa is frequent, the possibility that Ebola virus would enter China was high. Thus, an external assessment of the quality of Ebola virus detection was organized by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories in China. Virus-like particles encapsulating known sequences of epidemic strains of Ebola virus from 2014 were prepared as positive quality controls. The sample panel, which was composed of seven positive and three negative samples, was dispatched to 19 laboratories participating in this assessment of Ebola virus detection. Accurate detection was reported at 14 of the 19 participating laboratories, with a sensitivity of 91.43% and a specificity of 100%. Four participants (21.05%) reported false-negative results and were classified as “acceptable.” One participant (5.26%) did not detect any positive samples and was thus classified as “improvable.” Based on the results returned, the ability to detect weakly positive Ebola specimens should be improved. Furthermore, commercial assays and the standard primers offered by the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were found to be most accurate and dependable for Ebola detection. A two-target detection approach is recommended for Ebola screening; this approach could reduce the probability of false-negative results. Additionally, standardization of operations and punctual adjustment of instruments are necessary for the control and prevention of Ebola virus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4503447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45034472015-07-17 External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China Wang, Guojing Sun, Yu Zhang, Kuo Jia, Tingting Hao, Mingju Zhang, Dong Chang, Le Zhang, Lei Zhang, Rui Lin, Guigao Peng, Rongxue Li, Jinming PLoS One Research Article In 2014, Ebola hemorrhagic fever broke out in West Africa. As contact between China and West Africa is frequent, the possibility that Ebola virus would enter China was high. Thus, an external assessment of the quality of Ebola virus detection was organized by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories in China. Virus-like particles encapsulating known sequences of epidemic strains of Ebola virus from 2014 were prepared as positive quality controls. The sample panel, which was composed of seven positive and three negative samples, was dispatched to 19 laboratories participating in this assessment of Ebola virus detection. Accurate detection was reported at 14 of the 19 participating laboratories, with a sensitivity of 91.43% and a specificity of 100%. Four participants (21.05%) reported false-negative results and were classified as “acceptable.” One participant (5.26%) did not detect any positive samples and was thus classified as “improvable.” Based on the results returned, the ability to detect weakly positive Ebola specimens should be improved. Furthermore, commercial assays and the standard primers offered by the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were found to be most accurate and dependable for Ebola detection. A two-target detection approach is recommended for Ebola screening; this approach could reduce the probability of false-negative results. Additionally, standardization of operations and punctual adjustment of instruments are necessary for the control and prevention of Ebola virus. Public Library of Science 2015-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4503447/ /pubmed/26177537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132659 Text en © 2015 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Guojing
Sun, Yu
Zhang, Kuo
Jia, Tingting
Hao, Mingju
Zhang, Dong
Chang, Le
Zhang, Lei
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Guigao
Peng, Rongxue
Li, Jinming
External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title_full External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title_fullStr External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title_full_unstemmed External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title_short External Quality Assessment of Molecular Detection of Ebola Virus in China
title_sort external quality assessment of molecular detection of ebola virus in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132659
work_keys_str_mv AT wangguojing externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT sunyu externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT zhangkuo externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT jiatingting externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT haomingju externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT zhangdong externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT changle externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT zhanglei externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT zhangrui externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT linguigao externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT pengrongxue externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina
AT lijinming externalqualityassessmentofmoleculardetectionofebolavirusinchina