Cargando…

Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited

Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust asso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aberg, Karolina A., Xie, Linying, Chan, Robin F., Zhao, Min, Pandey, Ashutosh K., Kumar, Gaurav, Clark, Shaunna L., van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205
_version_ 1782381357397180416
author Aberg, Karolina A.
Xie, Linying
Chan, Robin F.
Zhao, Min
Pandey, Ashutosh K.
Kumar, Gaurav
Clark, Shaunna L.
van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G.
author_facet Aberg, Karolina A.
Xie, Linying
Chan, Robin F.
Zhao, Min
Pandey, Ashutosh K.
Kumar, Gaurav
Clark, Shaunna L.
van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G.
author_sort Aberg, Karolina A.
collection PubMed
description Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust associations and producing findings that replicate with other technologies such as targeted pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA. There are several kits commercially available that can be used for MBD enrichment. Our previous work has involved MethylMiner (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) that we chose after careful investigation of its properties. However, in a recent evaluation of five commercially available MBD-enrichment kits the performance of the MethylMiner was deemed poor. Given our positive experience with MethylMiner, we were surprised by this report. In an attempt to reproduce these findings we here have performed a direct comparison of MethylMiner with MethylCap (Diagenode Inc, Denville, NJ, USA), the best performing kit in that study. We find that both MethylMiner and MethylCap are two well performing MBD-enrichment kits. However, MethylMiner shows somewhat better enrichment efficiency and lower levels of background “noise”. In addition, for the purpose of MWAS where we want to investigate the majority of CpGs, we find MethylMiner to be superior as it allows tailoring the enrichment to the regions where most CpGs are located. Using targeted bisulfite sequencing we confirmed that sites where methylation was detected by either MethylMiner or by MethylCap indeed were methylated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4503759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45037592015-07-17 Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited Aberg, Karolina A. Xie, Linying Chan, Robin F. Zhao, Min Pandey, Ashutosh K. Kumar, Gaurav Clark, Shaunna L. van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. PLoS One Research Article Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust associations and producing findings that replicate with other technologies such as targeted pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA. There are several kits commercially available that can be used for MBD enrichment. Our previous work has involved MethylMiner (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) that we chose after careful investigation of its properties. However, in a recent evaluation of five commercially available MBD-enrichment kits the performance of the MethylMiner was deemed poor. Given our positive experience with MethylMiner, we were surprised by this report. In an attempt to reproduce these findings we here have performed a direct comparison of MethylMiner with MethylCap (Diagenode Inc, Denville, NJ, USA), the best performing kit in that study. We find that both MethylMiner and MethylCap are two well performing MBD-enrichment kits. However, MethylMiner shows somewhat better enrichment efficiency and lower levels of background “noise”. In addition, for the purpose of MWAS where we want to investigate the majority of CpGs, we find MethylMiner to be superior as it allows tailoring the enrichment to the regions where most CpGs are located. Using targeted bisulfite sequencing we confirmed that sites where methylation was detected by either MethylMiner or by MethylCap indeed were methylated. Public Library of Science 2015-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4503759/ /pubmed/26177298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205 Text en © 2015 Aberg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aberg, Karolina A.
Xie, Linying
Chan, Robin F.
Zhao, Min
Pandey, Ashutosh K.
Kumar, Gaurav
Clark, Shaunna L.
van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G.
Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title_full Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title_fullStr Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title_short Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
title_sort evaluation of methyl-binding domain based enrichment approaches revisited
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205
work_keys_str_mv AT abergkarolinaa evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT xielinying evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT chanrobinf evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT zhaomin evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT pandeyashutoshk evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT kumargaurav evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT clarkshaunnal evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited
AT vandenoordedwinjcg evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited