Cargando…
Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited
Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust asso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205 |
_version_ | 1782381357397180416 |
---|---|
author | Aberg, Karolina A. Xie, Linying Chan, Robin F. Zhao, Min Pandey, Ashutosh K. Kumar, Gaurav Clark, Shaunna L. van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. |
author_facet | Aberg, Karolina A. Xie, Linying Chan, Robin F. Zhao, Min Pandey, Ashutosh K. Kumar, Gaurav Clark, Shaunna L. van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. |
author_sort | Aberg, Karolina A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust associations and producing findings that replicate with other technologies such as targeted pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA. There are several kits commercially available that can be used for MBD enrichment. Our previous work has involved MethylMiner (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) that we chose after careful investigation of its properties. However, in a recent evaluation of five commercially available MBD-enrichment kits the performance of the MethylMiner was deemed poor. Given our positive experience with MethylMiner, we were surprised by this report. In an attempt to reproduce these findings we here have performed a direct comparison of MethylMiner with MethylCap (Diagenode Inc, Denville, NJ, USA), the best performing kit in that study. We find that both MethylMiner and MethylCap are two well performing MBD-enrichment kits. However, MethylMiner shows somewhat better enrichment efficiency and lower levels of background “noise”. In addition, for the purpose of MWAS where we want to investigate the majority of CpGs, we find MethylMiner to be superior as it allows tailoring the enrichment to the regions where most CpGs are located. Using targeted bisulfite sequencing we confirmed that sites where methylation was detected by either MethylMiner or by MethylCap indeed were methylated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4503759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45037592015-07-17 Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited Aberg, Karolina A. Xie, Linying Chan, Robin F. Zhao, Min Pandey, Ashutosh K. Kumar, Gaurav Clark, Shaunna L. van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. PLoS One Research Article Methyl-binding domain (MBD) enrichment followed by deep sequencing (MBD-seq), is a robust and cost efficient approach for methylome-wide association studies (MWAS). MBD-seq has been demonstrated to be capable of identifying differentially methylated regions, detecting previously reported robust associations and producing findings that replicate with other technologies such as targeted pyrosequencing of bisulfite converted DNA. There are several kits commercially available that can be used for MBD enrichment. Our previous work has involved MethylMiner (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) that we chose after careful investigation of its properties. However, in a recent evaluation of five commercially available MBD-enrichment kits the performance of the MethylMiner was deemed poor. Given our positive experience with MethylMiner, we were surprised by this report. In an attempt to reproduce these findings we here have performed a direct comparison of MethylMiner with MethylCap (Diagenode Inc, Denville, NJ, USA), the best performing kit in that study. We find that both MethylMiner and MethylCap are two well performing MBD-enrichment kits. However, MethylMiner shows somewhat better enrichment efficiency and lower levels of background “noise”. In addition, for the purpose of MWAS where we want to investigate the majority of CpGs, we find MethylMiner to be superior as it allows tailoring the enrichment to the regions where most CpGs are located. Using targeted bisulfite sequencing we confirmed that sites where methylation was detected by either MethylMiner or by MethylCap indeed were methylated. Public Library of Science 2015-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4503759/ /pubmed/26177298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205 Text en © 2015 Aberg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aberg, Karolina A. Xie, Linying Chan, Robin F. Zhao, Min Pandey, Ashutosh K. Kumar, Gaurav Clark, Shaunna L. van den Oord, Edwin J. C. G. Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title | Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title_full | Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title_short | Evaluation of Methyl-Binding Domain Based Enrichment Approaches Revisited |
title_sort | evaluation of methyl-binding domain based enrichment approaches revisited |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4503759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abergkarolinaa evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT xielinying evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT chanrobinf evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT zhaomin evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT pandeyashutoshk evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT kumargaurav evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT clarkshaunnal evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited AT vandenoordedwinjcg evaluationofmethylbindingdomainbasedenrichmentapproachesrevisited |