Cargando…

Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chauhan, Ramesh Chand, Purty, Anil J., Singh, Neelima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229752
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941
_version_ 1782381418573201408
author Chauhan, Ramesh Chand
Purty, Anil J.
Singh, Neelima
author_facet Chauhan, Ramesh Chand
Purty, Anil J.
Singh, Neelima
author_sort Chauhan, Ramesh Chand
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. It is important to find out the acceptability for A-V recording of the consent process and reasons for refusal, if any to address this new challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive survey was done among 150 residents of a rural community of South India. Acceptability for A-V recording of consent process was assessed among those who had given the informed written consent for participation in the study. An attempt to find the factors determining the refusal was also made. RESULTS: More than one-third (34%) of the study subjects refused to give consent for A-V recording of consent process. Not interested in recording or don’t like to be recorded (39%) were the most common reasons to refuse for A-V recording of consent process. The refusal was higher among female and younger age-group adult subjects. Socioeconomic status was not found to be significantly associated with refusal to consent for A-V recording. CONCLUSION: Refusal for A-V recording of consent process is high in the South Indian rural population. Before any major clinical trial, particularly a field trial, an assessment of consent for A-V recording would be helpful in recruitment of study subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4504058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45040582015-07-30 Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India Chauhan, Ramesh Chand Purty, Anil J. Singh, Neelima Perspect Clin Res Original Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. It is important to find out the acceptability for A-V recording of the consent process and reasons for refusal, if any to address this new challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive survey was done among 150 residents of a rural community of South India. Acceptability for A-V recording of consent process was assessed among those who had given the informed written consent for participation in the study. An attempt to find the factors determining the refusal was also made. RESULTS: More than one-third (34%) of the study subjects refused to give consent for A-V recording of consent process. Not interested in recording or don’t like to be recorded (39%) were the most common reasons to refuse for A-V recording of consent process. The refusal was higher among female and younger age-group adult subjects. Socioeconomic status was not found to be significantly associated with refusal to consent for A-V recording. CONCLUSION: Refusal for A-V recording of consent process is high in the South Indian rural population. Before any major clinical trial, particularly a field trial, an assessment of consent for A-V recording would be helpful in recruitment of study subjects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4504058/ /pubmed/26229752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chauhan, Ramesh Chand
Purty, Anil J.
Singh, Neelima
Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title_full Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title_fullStr Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title_full_unstemmed Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title_short Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
title_sort consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural south india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229752
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941
work_keys_str_mv AT chauhanrameshchand consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia
AT purtyanilj consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia
AT singhneelima consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia