Cargando…
Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. I...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941 |
_version_ | 1782381418573201408 |
---|---|
author | Chauhan, Ramesh Chand Purty, Anil J. Singh, Neelima |
author_facet | Chauhan, Ramesh Chand Purty, Anil J. Singh, Neelima |
author_sort | Chauhan, Ramesh Chand |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. It is important to find out the acceptability for A-V recording of the consent process and reasons for refusal, if any to address this new challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive survey was done among 150 residents of a rural community of South India. Acceptability for A-V recording of consent process was assessed among those who had given the informed written consent for participation in the study. An attempt to find the factors determining the refusal was also made. RESULTS: More than one-third (34%) of the study subjects refused to give consent for A-V recording of consent process. Not interested in recording or don’t like to be recorded (39%) were the most common reasons to refuse for A-V recording of consent process. The refusal was higher among female and younger age-group adult subjects. Socioeconomic status was not found to be significantly associated with refusal to consent for A-V recording. CONCLUSION: Refusal for A-V recording of consent process is high in the South Indian rural population. Before any major clinical trial, particularly a field trial, an assessment of consent for A-V recording would be helpful in recruitment of study subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4504058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45040582015-07-30 Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India Chauhan, Ramesh Chand Purty, Anil J. Singh, Neelima Perspect Clin Res Original Article INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In recent times, audio-video (A-V) recording of consent process for all the study subjects entering a clinical trial has been made mandatory. A-V recording of informed consent process is a big challenge due to confidentiality and the sociocultural environment in India. It is important to find out the acceptability for A-V recording of the consent process and reasons for refusal, if any to address this new challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive survey was done among 150 residents of a rural community of South India. Acceptability for A-V recording of consent process was assessed among those who had given the informed written consent for participation in the study. An attempt to find the factors determining the refusal was also made. RESULTS: More than one-third (34%) of the study subjects refused to give consent for A-V recording of consent process. Not interested in recording or don’t like to be recorded (39%) were the most common reasons to refuse for A-V recording of consent process. The refusal was higher among female and younger age-group adult subjects. Socioeconomic status was not found to be significantly associated with refusal to consent for A-V recording. CONCLUSION: Refusal for A-V recording of consent process is high in the South Indian rural population. Before any major clinical trial, particularly a field trial, an assessment of consent for A-V recording would be helpful in recruitment of study subjects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4504058/ /pubmed/26229752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chauhan, Ramesh Chand Purty, Anil J. Singh, Neelima Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title | Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title_full | Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title_fullStr | Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title_full_unstemmed | Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title_short | Consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural South India |
title_sort | consent for audio-video recording of informed consent process in rural south india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229752 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chauhanrameshchand consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia AT purtyanilj consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia AT singhneelima consentforaudiovideorecordingofinformedconsentprocessinruralsouthindia |