Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Shallini, Khajuria, Vijay, Tandon, Vishal R., Mahajan, Annil, Gillani, Zahid H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942
_version_ 1782381418804936704
author Gupta, Shallini
Khajuria, Vijay
Tandon, Vishal R.
Mahajan, Annil
Gillani, Zahid H.
author_facet Gupta, Shallini
Khajuria, Vijay
Tandon, Vishal R.
Mahajan, Annil
Gillani, Zahid H.
author_sort Gupta, Shallini
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients with uncomplicated T2DM, on treatment with MF for 4 months out of which on maximum tolerated dose of MF (1000-2500 mg/day) for 4 weeks, glycosylated Haemoglobin [HbA1c]) ≥6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥126 mg/dl and post prandial glucose (PPG) ≥200 mg/dl were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive MF (500 mg BD) + VG (50 mg BD) or MF (500 mg BD) + GP (2 mg BD). RESULTS: Both the groups caused significant decline in blood glucose levels both FBG as well as PPG levels (P < 0.01). HbA1c was also reduced significantly in both groups at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). Total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein decreased significantly, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly from baseline levels in both the groups (P < 0.01). Intergroup comparison failed to demonstrate any statistical difference on all of above parameters. Both weight and body mass index did not alter statistically from baseline in either of the groups as well as demonstrated no difference statistically on comparison (P > 0.05). At the end of the study, both liver functions tests and renal functions tests remained unaltered statistically and within normal clinical range in both the groups (P > 0.05). However, hypoglycemia and other adverse events were numerically more in MF + GP group. CONCLUSION: Both the regimens on comparison revealed similar efficacy and safety thereby failing to prove superiority over each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4504059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45040592015-07-30 Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study Gupta, Shallini Khajuria, Vijay Tandon, Vishal R. Mahajan, Annil Gillani, Zahid H. Perspect Clin Res Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients with uncomplicated T2DM, on treatment with MF for 4 months out of which on maximum tolerated dose of MF (1000-2500 mg/day) for 4 weeks, glycosylated Haemoglobin [HbA1c]) ≥6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥126 mg/dl and post prandial glucose (PPG) ≥200 mg/dl were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive MF (500 mg BD) + VG (50 mg BD) or MF (500 mg BD) + GP (2 mg BD). RESULTS: Both the groups caused significant decline in blood glucose levels both FBG as well as PPG levels (P < 0.01). HbA1c was also reduced significantly in both groups at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). Total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein decreased significantly, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly from baseline levels in both the groups (P < 0.01). Intergroup comparison failed to demonstrate any statistical difference on all of above parameters. Both weight and body mass index did not alter statistically from baseline in either of the groups as well as demonstrated no difference statistically on comparison (P > 0.05). At the end of the study, both liver functions tests and renal functions tests remained unaltered statistically and within normal clinical range in both the groups (P > 0.05). However, hypoglycemia and other adverse events were numerically more in MF + GP group. CONCLUSION: Both the regimens on comparison revealed similar efficacy and safety thereby failing to prove superiority over each other. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4504059/ /pubmed/26229753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Shallini
Khajuria, Vijay
Tandon, Vishal R.
Mahajan, Annil
Gillani, Zahid H.
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title_full Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title_short Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-a randomised open label study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942
work_keys_str_mv AT guptashallini comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy
AT khajuriavijay comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy
AT tandonvishalr comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy
AT mahajanannil comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy
AT gillanizahidh comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy