Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942 |
_version_ | 1782381418804936704 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Shallini Khajuria, Vijay Tandon, Vishal R. Mahajan, Annil Gillani, Zahid H. |
author_facet | Gupta, Shallini Khajuria, Vijay Tandon, Vishal R. Mahajan, Annil Gillani, Zahid H. |
author_sort | Gupta, Shallini |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients with uncomplicated T2DM, on treatment with MF for 4 months out of which on maximum tolerated dose of MF (1000-2500 mg/day) for 4 weeks, glycosylated Haemoglobin [HbA1c]) ≥6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥126 mg/dl and post prandial glucose (PPG) ≥200 mg/dl were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive MF (500 mg BD) + VG (50 mg BD) or MF (500 mg BD) + GP (2 mg BD). RESULTS: Both the groups caused significant decline in blood glucose levels both FBG as well as PPG levels (P < 0.01). HbA1c was also reduced significantly in both groups at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). Total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein decreased significantly, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly from baseline levels in both the groups (P < 0.01). Intergroup comparison failed to demonstrate any statistical difference on all of above parameters. Both weight and body mass index did not alter statistically from baseline in either of the groups as well as demonstrated no difference statistically on comparison (P > 0.05). At the end of the study, both liver functions tests and renal functions tests remained unaltered statistically and within normal clinical range in both the groups (P > 0.05). However, hypoglycemia and other adverse events were numerically more in MF + GP group. CONCLUSION: Both the regimens on comparison revealed similar efficacy and safety thereby failing to prove superiority over each other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4504059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45040592015-07-30 Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study Gupta, Shallini Khajuria, Vijay Tandon, Vishal R. Mahajan, Annil Gillani, Zahid H. Perspect Clin Res Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combinations of metformin-vidagliptin (MF-VG) and metfromin-glimepiride (MF-GP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative randomized open-label trial was conducted on patients with uncomplicated T2DM, on treatment with MF for 4 months out of which on maximum tolerated dose of MF (1000-2500 mg/day) for 4 weeks, glycosylated Haemoglobin [HbA1c]) ≥6.5%, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥126 mg/dl and post prandial glucose (PPG) ≥200 mg/dl were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive MF (500 mg BD) + VG (50 mg BD) or MF (500 mg BD) + GP (2 mg BD). RESULTS: Both the groups caused significant decline in blood glucose levels both FBG as well as PPG levels (P < 0.01). HbA1c was also reduced significantly in both groups at 12 weeks (P < 0.01). Total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein decreased significantly, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly from baseline levels in both the groups (P < 0.01). Intergroup comparison failed to demonstrate any statistical difference on all of above parameters. Both weight and body mass index did not alter statistically from baseline in either of the groups as well as demonstrated no difference statistically on comparison (P > 0.05). At the end of the study, both liver functions tests and renal functions tests remained unaltered statistically and within normal clinical range in both the groups (P > 0.05). However, hypoglycemia and other adverse events were numerically more in MF + GP group. CONCLUSION: Both the regimens on comparison revealed similar efficacy and safety thereby failing to prove superiority over each other. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4504059/ /pubmed/26229753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942 Text en Copyright: © Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Shallini Khajuria, Vijay Tandon, Vishal R. Mahajan, Annil Gillani, Zahid H. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title | Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-A randomised open label study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of combination of metformin-vidagliptin versus metfromin-glimepiride in most frequently used doses in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequately controlled metformin monotherapy-a randomised open label study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.159942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptashallini comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy AT khajuriavijay comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy AT tandonvishalr comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy AT mahajanannil comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy AT gillanizahidh comparativeevaluationofefficacyandsafetyofcombinationofmetforminvidagliptinversusmetfrominglimepirideinmostfrequentlyuseddosesinpatientsoftype2diabetesmellituswithinadequatelycontrolledmetforminmonotherapyarandomisedopenlabelstudy |