Cargando…
Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program
CONTEXT: The community research fellows training (CRFT) program is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington Universit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179 |
_version_ | 1782381436902309888 |
---|---|
author | D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy Stafford, Jewel D. Thompson, Vetta Lynn Johnson-Javois, Bethany Goodman, Melody S. |
author_facet | D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy Stafford, Jewel D. Thompson, Vetta Lynn Johnson-Javois, Bethany Goodman, Melody S. |
author_sort | D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: The community research fellows training (CRFT) program is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. OBJECTIVES: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. PARTICIPANTS: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, pre- and post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program’s community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. RESULTS: The CRFT participants’ knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p < 0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. CONCLUSION: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4504145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45041452015-07-31 Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy Stafford, Jewel D. Thompson, Vetta Lynn Johnson-Javois, Bethany Goodman, Melody S. Front Public Health Public Health CONTEXT: The community research fellows training (CRFT) program is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. OBJECTIVES: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. PARTICIPANTS: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, pre- and post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program’s community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. RESULTS: The CRFT participants’ knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p < 0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. CONCLUSION: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4504145/ /pubmed/26236703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179 Text en Copyright © 2015 D’Agostino McGowan, Stafford, Thompson, Johnson-Javois and Goodman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health D’Agostino McGowan, Lucy Stafford, Jewel D. Thompson, Vetta Lynn Johnson-Javois, Bethany Goodman, Melody S. Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title | Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title_full | Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title_short | Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program |
title_sort | quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dagostinomcgowanlucy quantitativeevaluationofthecommunityresearchfellowstrainingprogram AT staffordjeweld quantitativeevaluationofthecommunityresearchfellowstrainingprogram AT thompsonvettalynn quantitativeevaluationofthecommunityresearchfellowstrainingprogram AT johnsonjavoisbethany quantitativeevaluationofthecommunityresearchfellowstrainingprogram AT goodmanmelodys quantitativeevaluationofthecommunityresearchfellowstrainingprogram |