Cargando…
Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method
BACKGROUND: Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-P) belongs to the polymeric guanidine family of biocides and contains a phosphate group, which may confer better solubility, a detoxifying effect and may change the kinetics and dynamics of PHMG-P interactions with microorganisms. Limited data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26182984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0097-x |
_version_ | 1782381458164285440 |
---|---|
author | Vitt, A Sofrata, A Slizen, V Sugars, R V Gustafsson, A Gudkova, E I Kazeko, L A Ramberg, P Buhlin, K |
author_facet | Vitt, A Sofrata, A Slizen, V Sugars, R V Gustafsson, A Gudkova, E I Kazeko, L A Ramberg, P Buhlin, K |
author_sort | Vitt, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-P) belongs to the polymeric guanidine family of biocides and contains a phosphate group, which may confer better solubility, a detoxifying effect and may change the kinetics and dynamics of PHMG-P interactions with microorganisms. Limited data regarding PHMG-P activity against periodontopathogenic and cariogenic microorganisms necessitates studies in this area. Aim is to evaluate polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate antimicrobial activity in comparison to chlorhexidine. METHODS: Quantitative suspension method was used enrolling Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. RESULTS: Both tested antiseptics at their clinically-used concentrations, of 0.2% (w/v) and 1% (w/v), correspondingly provided swift bactericidal effects against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli andC. albicans, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis with reduction factors higher than 6.0. Diluted polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate and chlorhexidine to 0.05% continued to display anti-bacterial activity and decreased titers of standard quality control, periopathogens to below 1.0 × 10(3) colony forming units/ml, albeit requiring prolonged exposure time. To achieve a bactericidal effect against S. mutans, both antiseptics at all concentrations required a longer exposure time. We found that a clinically-used 1% of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate concentration did not have activity against L. acidophilus. CONCLUSION: High RF of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate and retention of bactericidal effects, even at 0.05%, support the use of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate as a biocide with sufficient anti-microbial activity against periopathogens. Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate displayed bactericidal activity against periopathogens and S. mutans and could potentially be applied in the management of oral diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12941-015-0097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4504446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45044462015-07-17 Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method Vitt, A Sofrata, A Slizen, V Sugars, R V Gustafsson, A Gudkova, E I Kazeko, L A Ramberg, P Buhlin, K Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-P) belongs to the polymeric guanidine family of biocides and contains a phosphate group, which may confer better solubility, a detoxifying effect and may change the kinetics and dynamics of PHMG-P interactions with microorganisms. Limited data regarding PHMG-P activity against periodontopathogenic and cariogenic microorganisms necessitates studies in this area. Aim is to evaluate polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate antimicrobial activity in comparison to chlorhexidine. METHODS: Quantitative suspension method was used enrolling Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. RESULTS: Both tested antiseptics at their clinically-used concentrations, of 0.2% (w/v) and 1% (w/v), correspondingly provided swift bactericidal effects against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli andC. albicans, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis with reduction factors higher than 6.0. Diluted polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate and chlorhexidine to 0.05% continued to display anti-bacterial activity and decreased titers of standard quality control, periopathogens to below 1.0 × 10(3) colony forming units/ml, albeit requiring prolonged exposure time. To achieve a bactericidal effect against S. mutans, both antiseptics at all concentrations required a longer exposure time. We found that a clinically-used 1% of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate concentration did not have activity against L. acidophilus. CONCLUSION: High RF of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate and retention of bactericidal effects, even at 0.05%, support the use of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate as a biocide with sufficient anti-microbial activity against periopathogens. Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate displayed bactericidal activity against periopathogens and S. mutans and could potentially be applied in the management of oral diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12941-015-0097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4504446/ /pubmed/26182984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0097-x Text en © Vitt et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Vitt, A Sofrata, A Slizen, V Sugars, R V Gustafsson, A Gudkova, E I Kazeko, L A Ramberg, P Buhlin, K Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title | Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title_full | Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title_short | Antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
title_sort | antimicrobial activity of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate in comparison to chlorhexidine using the quantitative suspension method |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26182984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0097-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vitta antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT sofrataa antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT slizenv antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT sugarsrv antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT gustafssona antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT gudkovaei antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT kazekola antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT rambergp antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod AT buhlink antimicrobialactivityofpolyhexamethyleneguanidinephosphateincomparisontochlorhexidineusingthequantitativesuspensionmethod |