Cargando…

Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model

PURPOSE: Because the cytotoxic potential of hydrophilic drugs like bleomycin (BLM) is restricted by its low membrane permeability, the application of low-intensity ultrasound (US) on growing tumor cells enhances intracellular delivery of BLM after intratumoral administration, thereby potentiating it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousefian, Bahram, Firoozabadi, Seyed Mohammad, Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26191104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0120-7
_version_ 1782381519300460544
author Yousefian, Bahram
Firoozabadi, Seyed Mohammad
Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe
author_facet Yousefian, Bahram
Firoozabadi, Seyed Mohammad
Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe
author_sort Yousefian, Bahram
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Because the cytotoxic potential of hydrophilic drugs like bleomycin (BLM) is restricted by its low membrane permeability, the application of low-intensity ultrasound (US) on growing tumor cells enhances intracellular delivery of BLM after intratumoral administration, thereby potentiating its cytotoxicity. In the present study, the in vivo cell membrane permeability enhancement with US (1 MHz, 2, 5, and 10 min, I(SPTA) = 2 W/cm(2)) is compared with the murine model of breast adenocarcinoma in BALB/c mice. METHODS: Tumor induction was performed through a homograft surgery procedure. Mice were anesthetized before putting them in sonication situations. Sonications were done in an aquarium. Seven groups of the tumor-bearing mice, each consisting of eight mice, were sonicated without or after intratumoral injection of 0.1 ml BLM at different exposure times. The tumor volume was evaluated to assess the growth process by use of a digital caliper. RESULTS: The results show that the BLM control group has a significant difference with BLM plus 10 min US on day 2 (p < 0.05). There is a significant difference between 2- and 10-min sonication on days 8 and 10 also. The difference between the Only US group and the other groups except Sham US was significant too (p < 0.05). Significant differences were seen only between the BLM plus US groups with Sham US and Only US control groups. CONCLUSION: It has been concluded that for significant permeabilization of the cell membrane, sonication time for more than 10 min is required. Significant difference between the Only US and other groups indicates that US has a promoting effect on cell division procedure, in spite of the no-carcinogen effect of the US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4504854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45048542015-07-17 Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model Yousefian, Bahram Firoozabadi, Seyed Mohammad Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe J Ultrasound Original Article PURPOSE: Because the cytotoxic potential of hydrophilic drugs like bleomycin (BLM) is restricted by its low membrane permeability, the application of low-intensity ultrasound (US) on growing tumor cells enhances intracellular delivery of BLM after intratumoral administration, thereby potentiating its cytotoxicity. In the present study, the in vivo cell membrane permeability enhancement with US (1 MHz, 2, 5, and 10 min, I(SPTA) = 2 W/cm(2)) is compared with the murine model of breast adenocarcinoma in BALB/c mice. METHODS: Tumor induction was performed through a homograft surgery procedure. Mice were anesthetized before putting them in sonication situations. Sonications were done in an aquarium. Seven groups of the tumor-bearing mice, each consisting of eight mice, were sonicated without or after intratumoral injection of 0.1 ml BLM at different exposure times. The tumor volume was evaluated to assess the growth process by use of a digital caliper. RESULTS: The results show that the BLM control group has a significant difference with BLM plus 10 min US on day 2 (p < 0.05). There is a significant difference between 2- and 10-min sonication on days 8 and 10 also. The difference between the Only US group and the other groups except Sham US was significant too (p < 0.05). Significant differences were seen only between the BLM plus US groups with Sham US and Only US control groups. CONCLUSION: It has been concluded that for significant permeabilization of the cell membrane, sonication time for more than 10 min is required. Significant difference between the Only US and other groups indicates that US has a promoting effect on cell division procedure, in spite of the no-carcinogen effect of the US. Springer International Publishing 2014-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4504854/ /pubmed/26191104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0120-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yousefian, Bahram
Firoozabadi, Seyed Mohammad
Mokhtari-Dizaji, Manijhe
Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title_full Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title_fullStr Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title_full_unstemmed Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title_short Sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
title_sort sonochemotherapy of breast adenocarcinoma: an experimental in vivo model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26191104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0120-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yousefianbahram sonochemotherapyofbreastadenocarcinomaanexperimentalinvivomodel
AT firoozabadiseyedmohammad sonochemotherapyofbreastadenocarcinomaanexperimentalinvivomodel
AT mokhtaridizajimanijhe sonochemotherapyofbreastadenocarcinomaanexperimentalinvivomodel