Cargando…

Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report

BACKGROUND: Rapid and uneventful postoperative recovery following general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery may offer challenges to anesthesiologists. With improved surgical techniques and shorter pneumoperitoneum, regional anesthesia may be considered for this lapar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Wei-Chun, Chen, Wei-Hung, Shih, Yu-Hsuan, Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26203409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1153-x
_version_ 1782381519755542528
author Hung, Wei-Chun
Chen, Wei-Hung
Shih, Yu-Hsuan
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_facet Hung, Wei-Chun
Chen, Wei-Hung
Shih, Yu-Hsuan
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_sort Hung, Wei-Chun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid and uneventful postoperative recovery following general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery may offer challenges to anesthesiologists. With improved surgical techniques and shorter pneumoperitoneum, regional anesthesia may be considered for this laparoscopic procedure in selected cases. CASE DESCRIPTION: The first patient was a 60-year-old male (body mass index: 39 kg/m(2)) who was scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 46-year-old female (body mass index: 47 kg/m(2)) who was scheduled for laparoscopic gastric bypass. After standard intraoperative monitoring was applied, epidural anesthesia was performed at thoracic level T9–T10. Surgical technique modification included insufflation of CO(2) at a low flow rate and avoidance of orogastric tube use. During the procedure, both patients breathed spontaneously without difficulty. One hypotension episode occurred and was successfully treated with a 12-mg bolus of ephedrine in case 1. Shoulder pain occurred intraoperatively in case 2 and was successfully treated with a 50-μg bolus of fentanyl. Postoperatively, 2 mg epidural morphine was administered for postoperative analgesia. Both patients were satisfied with the anesthesia technique and was discharged uneventfully. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: This anesthetic technique may maintain pre-operative respiratory function, increase alertness, and reduce the use of rescue analgesics, which is crucial for optimal outcomes in morbidly obese patients. Conversion of epidural anesthesia to general anesthesia may be required if patients can not tolerate the laparoscopic procedure (e.g. intolerable shoulder pain) or the increased respiratory rate during pneumoperitoneum leading to difficulty in performing laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate this issue. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia is widely used for laparoscopic bariatric surgery, but epidural anesthesia may be a viable alternative to general anesthesia in selected cases. Further prospective studies may be required to elucidate the relative advantages and disadvantages of epidural anesthesia in this surgical population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4504868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45048682015-07-22 Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report Hung, Wei-Chun Chen, Wei-Hung Shih, Yu-Hsuan Hung, Kuo-Chuan Springerplus Case Study BACKGROUND: Rapid and uneventful postoperative recovery following general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery may offer challenges to anesthesiologists. With improved surgical techniques and shorter pneumoperitoneum, regional anesthesia may be considered for this laparoscopic procedure in selected cases. CASE DESCRIPTION: The first patient was a 60-year-old male (body mass index: 39 kg/m(2)) who was scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 46-year-old female (body mass index: 47 kg/m(2)) who was scheduled for laparoscopic gastric bypass. After standard intraoperative monitoring was applied, epidural anesthesia was performed at thoracic level T9–T10. Surgical technique modification included insufflation of CO(2) at a low flow rate and avoidance of orogastric tube use. During the procedure, both patients breathed spontaneously without difficulty. One hypotension episode occurred and was successfully treated with a 12-mg bolus of ephedrine in case 1. Shoulder pain occurred intraoperatively in case 2 and was successfully treated with a 50-μg bolus of fentanyl. Postoperatively, 2 mg epidural morphine was administered for postoperative analgesia. Both patients were satisfied with the anesthesia technique and was discharged uneventfully. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: This anesthetic technique may maintain pre-operative respiratory function, increase alertness, and reduce the use of rescue analgesics, which is crucial for optimal outcomes in morbidly obese patients. Conversion of epidural anesthesia to general anesthesia may be required if patients can not tolerate the laparoscopic procedure (e.g. intolerable shoulder pain) or the increased respiratory rate during pneumoperitoneum leading to difficulty in performing laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate this issue. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia is widely used for laparoscopic bariatric surgery, but epidural anesthesia may be a viable alternative to general anesthesia in selected cases. Further prospective studies may be required to elucidate the relative advantages and disadvantages of epidural anesthesia in this surgical population. Springer International Publishing 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4504868/ /pubmed/26203409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1153-x Text en © Hung et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Study
Hung, Wei-Chun
Chen, Wei-Hung
Shih, Yu-Hsuan
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title_full Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title_fullStr Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title_short Epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
title_sort epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a case report
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26203409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1153-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hungweichun epiduralanesthesiaforlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryacasereport
AT chenweihung epiduralanesthesiaforlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryacasereport
AT shihyuhsuan epiduralanesthesiaforlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryacasereport
AT hungkuochuan epiduralanesthesiaforlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryacasereport