Cargando…

Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Depression, a major outcome in cancer patients, is often evaluated by physicians relying on their clinical impressions rather than patient self-report. Our aim was to assess agreement between patient self-reported depression, oncologist assessment (OA), and psychiatric clinical interview...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhondali, Wadih, Freyer, Gilles, Adam, Virginie, Filbet, Marilène, Derzelle, Martine, Abgrall-Barbry, Gaelle, Bourcelot, Sophie, Machavoine, Jean-Louis, Chomat-Neyraud, Muriel, Gisserot, Olivier, Largillier, Rémi, Le Rol, Annick, Priou, Frank, Saltel, Pierre, Falandry, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26203235
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S71690
_version_ 1782381628771794944
author Rhondali, Wadih
Freyer, Gilles
Adam, Virginie
Filbet, Marilène
Derzelle, Martine
Abgrall-Barbry, Gaelle
Bourcelot, Sophie
Machavoine, Jean-Louis
Chomat-Neyraud, Muriel
Gisserot, Olivier
Largillier, Rémi
Le Rol, Annick
Priou, Frank
Saltel, Pierre
Falandry, Claire
author_facet Rhondali, Wadih
Freyer, Gilles
Adam, Virginie
Filbet, Marilène
Derzelle, Martine
Abgrall-Barbry, Gaelle
Bourcelot, Sophie
Machavoine, Jean-Louis
Chomat-Neyraud, Muriel
Gisserot, Olivier
Largillier, Rémi
Le Rol, Annick
Priou, Frank
Saltel, Pierre
Falandry, Claire
author_sort Rhondali, Wadih
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depression, a major outcome in cancer patients, is often evaluated by physicians relying on their clinical impressions rather than patient self-report. Our aim was to assess agreement between patient self-reported depression, oncologist assessment (OA), and psychiatric clinical interview (PCI) in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: This analysis was a secondary endpoint of the Elderly Women AOC Trial 3 (EWOT3), designed to assess the impact of geriatric covariates, notably depression, on survival in patients older than 70 years of age. Depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale-30 (GDS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the distress thermometer, the mood thermometer, and OA. The interview guide for PCI was constructed from three validated scales: the GDS, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, revised (DSM) criteria for depression were used as a gold standard. RESULTS: Out of 109 patients enrolled at 21 centers, 99 (91%) completed all the assessments. Patient characteristics were: mean age 78, performance status ≥2: 47 (47%). Thirty six patients (36%) were identified as depressed by the PCI versus 15 (15%) identified by DSM. We found moderate agreement for depression identification between DSM and GDS (κ=0.508) and PCI (κ=0.431) and high agreement with MADRS (κ=0.663). We found low or no agreement between DSM with the other assessment strategies, including OA (κ=−0.043). Identification according to OA (yes/no) resulted in a false-negative rate of 87%. As a screening tool, GDS had the best sensitivity and specificity (94% and 80%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of validated tools, such as GDS, and collaboration between psychologists and oncologists are warranted to better identify emotional disorders in elderly women with AOC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4506027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45060272015-07-22 Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer Rhondali, Wadih Freyer, Gilles Adam, Virginie Filbet, Marilène Derzelle, Martine Abgrall-Barbry, Gaelle Bourcelot, Sophie Machavoine, Jean-Louis Chomat-Neyraud, Muriel Gisserot, Olivier Largillier, Rémi Le Rol, Annick Priou, Frank Saltel, Pierre Falandry, Claire Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: Depression, a major outcome in cancer patients, is often evaluated by physicians relying on their clinical impressions rather than patient self-report. Our aim was to assess agreement between patient self-reported depression, oncologist assessment (OA), and psychiatric clinical interview (PCI) in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: This analysis was a secondary endpoint of the Elderly Women AOC Trial 3 (EWOT3), designed to assess the impact of geriatric covariates, notably depression, on survival in patients older than 70 years of age. Depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale-30 (GDS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the distress thermometer, the mood thermometer, and OA. The interview guide for PCI was constructed from three validated scales: the GDS, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, revised (DSM) criteria for depression were used as a gold standard. RESULTS: Out of 109 patients enrolled at 21 centers, 99 (91%) completed all the assessments. Patient characteristics were: mean age 78, performance status ≥2: 47 (47%). Thirty six patients (36%) were identified as depressed by the PCI versus 15 (15%) identified by DSM. We found moderate agreement for depression identification between DSM and GDS (κ=0.508) and PCI (κ=0.431) and high agreement with MADRS (κ=0.663). We found low or no agreement between DSM with the other assessment strategies, including OA (κ=−0.043). Identification according to OA (yes/no) resulted in a false-negative rate of 87%. As a screening tool, GDS had the best sensitivity and specificity (94% and 80%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of validated tools, such as GDS, and collaboration between psychologists and oncologists are warranted to better identify emotional disorders in elderly women with AOC. Dove Medical Press 2015-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4506027/ /pubmed/26203235 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S71690 Text en © 2015 Rhondali et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rhondali, Wadih
Freyer, Gilles
Adam, Virginie
Filbet, Marilène
Derzelle, Martine
Abgrall-Barbry, Gaelle
Bourcelot, Sophie
Machavoine, Jean-Louis
Chomat-Neyraud, Muriel
Gisserot, Olivier
Largillier, Rémi
Le Rol, Annick
Priou, Frank
Saltel, Pierre
Falandry, Claire
Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_full Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_short Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_sort agreement for depression diagnosis between dsm-iv-tr criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26203235
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S71690
work_keys_str_mv AT rhondaliwadih agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT freyergilles agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT adamvirginie agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT filbetmarilene agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT derzellemartine agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT abgrallbarbrygaelle agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT bourcelotsophie agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT machavoinejeanlouis agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT chomatneyraudmuriel agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT gisserotolivier agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT largillierremi agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT lerolannick agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT prioufrank agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT saltelpierre agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
AT falandryclaire agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer