Cargando…
The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26186590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561 |
_version_ | 1782381635589636096 |
---|---|
author | Onushko, Tanya Schmit, Brian D. Hyngstrom, Allison |
author_facet | Onushko, Tanya Schmit, Brian D. Hyngstrom, Allison |
author_sort | Onushko, Tanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist) at 6 torque levels: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction. For half of the trials, subjects received patellar tendon taps (antagonist sensory feedback) during the contraction. We compared error in targeted knee flexion torque and hamstring muscle activity, with and without patellar tendon tapping, across the 6 torque levels. At lower torque levels (5%, 10%, and 15%), subjects produced greater knee torque error following tendon tapping compared with the same torque levels without tendon tapping. In contrast, we did not find any difference in torque output at higher target levels (20%, 30%, and 40%) between trials with and without tendon tapping. We also observed a load-dependent increase in the magnitude of agonist muscle activity after tendon taps, with no associated load-dependent increase in agonist and antagonist co-activation, or reflex inhibition from the antagonist tapping. The findings suggest that at relatively low muscle activity there is a deficiency in the ability to correct motor output after sensory disturbances, and cortical centers (versus sub-cortical) are likely involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4506057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45060572015-07-23 The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation Onushko, Tanya Schmit, Brian D. Hyngstrom, Allison PLoS One Research Article The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist) at 6 torque levels: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction. For half of the trials, subjects received patellar tendon taps (antagonist sensory feedback) during the contraction. We compared error in targeted knee flexion torque and hamstring muscle activity, with and without patellar tendon tapping, across the 6 torque levels. At lower torque levels (5%, 10%, and 15%), subjects produced greater knee torque error following tendon tapping compared with the same torque levels without tendon tapping. In contrast, we did not find any difference in torque output at higher target levels (20%, 30%, and 40%) between trials with and without tendon tapping. We also observed a load-dependent increase in the magnitude of agonist muscle activity after tendon taps, with no associated load-dependent increase in agonist and antagonist co-activation, or reflex inhibition from the antagonist tapping. The findings suggest that at relatively low muscle activity there is a deficiency in the ability to correct motor output after sensory disturbances, and cortical centers (versus sub-cortical) are likely involved. Public Library of Science 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4506057/ /pubmed/26186590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561 Text en © 2015 Onushko et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Onushko, Tanya Schmit, Brian D. Hyngstrom, Allison The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title | The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title_full | The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title_short | The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation |
title_sort | effect of antagonist muscle sensory input on force regulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26186590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onushkotanya theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation AT schmitbriand theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation AT hyngstromallison theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation AT onushkotanya effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation AT schmitbriand effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation AT hyngstromallison effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation |