Cargando…

The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation

The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onushko, Tanya, Schmit, Brian D., Hyngstrom, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26186590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561
_version_ 1782381635589636096
author Onushko, Tanya
Schmit, Brian D.
Hyngstrom, Allison
author_facet Onushko, Tanya
Schmit, Brian D.
Hyngstrom, Allison
author_sort Onushko, Tanya
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist) at 6 torque levels: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction. For half of the trials, subjects received patellar tendon taps (antagonist sensory feedback) during the contraction. We compared error in targeted knee flexion torque and hamstring muscle activity, with and without patellar tendon tapping, across the 6 torque levels. At lower torque levels (5%, 10%, and 15%), subjects produced greater knee torque error following tendon tapping compared with the same torque levels without tendon tapping. In contrast, we did not find any difference in torque output at higher target levels (20%, 30%, and 40%) between trials with and without tendon tapping. We also observed a load-dependent increase in the magnitude of agonist muscle activity after tendon taps, with no associated load-dependent increase in agonist and antagonist co-activation, or reflex inhibition from the antagonist tapping. The findings suggest that at relatively low muscle activity there is a deficiency in the ability to correct motor output after sensory disturbances, and cortical centers (versus sub-cortical) are likely involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4506057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45060572015-07-23 The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation Onushko, Tanya Schmit, Brian D. Hyngstrom, Allison PLoS One Research Article The purpose of this study was to understand how stretch-related sensory feedback from an antagonist muscle affects agonist muscle output at different contraction levels in healthy adults. Ten young (25.3 ± 2.4 years), healthy subjects performed constant isometric knee flexion contractions (agonist) at 6 torque levels: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction. For half of the trials, subjects received patellar tendon taps (antagonist sensory feedback) during the contraction. We compared error in targeted knee flexion torque and hamstring muscle activity, with and without patellar tendon tapping, across the 6 torque levels. At lower torque levels (5%, 10%, and 15%), subjects produced greater knee torque error following tendon tapping compared with the same torque levels without tendon tapping. In contrast, we did not find any difference in torque output at higher target levels (20%, 30%, and 40%) between trials with and without tendon tapping. We also observed a load-dependent increase in the magnitude of agonist muscle activity after tendon taps, with no associated load-dependent increase in agonist and antagonist co-activation, or reflex inhibition from the antagonist tapping. The findings suggest that at relatively low muscle activity there is a deficiency in the ability to correct motor output after sensory disturbances, and cortical centers (versus sub-cortical) are likely involved. Public Library of Science 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4506057/ /pubmed/26186590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561 Text en © 2015 Onushko et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Onushko, Tanya
Schmit, Brian D.
Hyngstrom, Allison
The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title_full The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title_fullStr The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title_short The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation
title_sort effect of antagonist muscle sensory input on force regulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26186590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133561
work_keys_str_mv AT onushkotanya theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation
AT schmitbriand theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation
AT hyngstromallison theeffectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation
AT onushkotanya effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation
AT schmitbriand effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation
AT hyngstromallison effectofantagonistmusclesensoryinputonforceregulation