Cargando…
Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells
The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the molecular pathways involved in the response, is becoming more common. In a companion article, a genomic biomarker was developed in human TK6 cells to classify chemicals as gen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.21940 |
_version_ | 1782381662518116352 |
---|---|
author | Buick, Julie K. Moffat, Ivy Williams, Andrew Swartz, Carol D. Recio, Leslie Hyduke, Daniel R. Li, Heng‐Hong Fornace, Albert J. Aubrecht, Jiri Yauk, Carole L. |
author_facet | Buick, Julie K. Moffat, Ivy Williams, Andrew Swartz, Carol D. Recio, Leslie Hyduke, Daniel R. Li, Heng‐Hong Fornace, Albert J. Aubrecht, Jiri Yauk, Carole L. |
author_sort | Buick, Julie K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the molecular pathways involved in the response, is becoming more common. In a companion article, a genomic biomarker was developed in human TK6 cells to classify chemicals as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. Because TK6 cells are not metabolically competent, we set out to broaden the utility of the biomarker for use with chemicals requiring metabolic activation. Specifically, chemical exposures were conducted in the presence of rat liver S9. The ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxic (benzo[a]pyrene, BaP; aflatoxin B1, AFB1) and nongenotoxic (dexamethasone, DEX; phenobarbital, PB) agents correctly was evaluated. Cells were exposed to increasing chemical concentrations for 4 hr and collected 0 hr, 4 hr, and 20 hr postexposure. Relative survival, apoptosis, and micronucleus frequency were measured at 24 hr. Transcriptome profiles were measured with Agilent microarrays. Statistical modeling and bioinformatics tools were applied to classify each chemical using the genomic biomarker. BaP and AFB1 were correctly classified as genotoxic at the mid‐ and high concentrations at all three time points, whereas DEX was correctly classified as nongenotoxic at all concentrations and time points. The high concentration of PB was misclassified at 24 hr, suggesting that cytotoxicity at later time points may cause misclassification. The data suggest that the use of S9 does not impair the ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxicity in TK6 cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the biomarker is also able to accurately classify genotoxicity using a publicly available dataset derived from human HepaRG cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 56:520–534, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4506226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45062262015-07-17 Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells Buick, Julie K. Moffat, Ivy Williams, Andrew Swartz, Carol D. Recio, Leslie Hyduke, Daniel R. Li, Heng‐Hong Fornace, Albert J. Aubrecht, Jiri Yauk, Carole L. Environ Mol Mutagen Research Articles The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the molecular pathways involved in the response, is becoming more common. In a companion article, a genomic biomarker was developed in human TK6 cells to classify chemicals as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. Because TK6 cells are not metabolically competent, we set out to broaden the utility of the biomarker for use with chemicals requiring metabolic activation. Specifically, chemical exposures were conducted in the presence of rat liver S9. The ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxic (benzo[a]pyrene, BaP; aflatoxin B1, AFB1) and nongenotoxic (dexamethasone, DEX; phenobarbital, PB) agents correctly was evaluated. Cells were exposed to increasing chemical concentrations for 4 hr and collected 0 hr, 4 hr, and 20 hr postexposure. Relative survival, apoptosis, and micronucleus frequency were measured at 24 hr. Transcriptome profiles were measured with Agilent microarrays. Statistical modeling and bioinformatics tools were applied to classify each chemical using the genomic biomarker. BaP and AFB1 were correctly classified as genotoxic at the mid‐ and high concentrations at all three time points, whereas DEX was correctly classified as nongenotoxic at all concentrations and time points. The high concentration of PB was misclassified at 24 hr, suggesting that cytotoxicity at later time points may cause misclassification. The data suggest that the use of S9 does not impair the ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxicity in TK6 cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the biomarker is also able to accurately classify genotoxicity using a publicly available dataset derived from human HepaRG cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 56:520–534, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-02 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4506226/ /pubmed/25733247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.21940 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Buick, Julie K. Moffat, Ivy Williams, Andrew Swartz, Carol D. Recio, Leslie Hyduke, Daniel R. Li, Heng‐Hong Fornace, Albert J. Aubrecht, Jiri Yauk, Carole L. Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title | Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_full | Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_fullStr | Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_short | Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_sort | integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human tk6 cells |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.21940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buickjuliek integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT moffativy integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT williamsandrew integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT swartzcarold integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT recioleslie integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT hydukedanielr integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT lihenghong integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT fornacealbertj integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT aubrechtjiri integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT yaukcarolel integrationofmetabolicactivationwithapredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells |