Cargando…
Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: There is a clear link between irregular breathing and errors in medical imaging and radiation treatment. The audiovisual biofeedback system is an advanced form of respiratory guidance that has previously demonstrated to facilitate regular patient breathing. The clinical benefits of audio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1483-7 |
_version_ | 1782381714221301760 |
---|---|
author | Pollock, Sean O’Brien, Ricky Makhija, Kuldeep Hegi-Johnson, Fiona Ludbrook, Jane Rezo, Angela Tse, Regina Eade, Thomas Yeghiaian-Alvandi, Roland Gebski, Val Keall, Paul J |
author_facet | Pollock, Sean O’Brien, Ricky Makhija, Kuldeep Hegi-Johnson, Fiona Ludbrook, Jane Rezo, Angela Tse, Regina Eade, Thomas Yeghiaian-Alvandi, Roland Gebski, Val Keall, Paul J |
author_sort | Pollock, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a clear link between irregular breathing and errors in medical imaging and radiation treatment. The audiovisual biofeedback system is an advanced form of respiratory guidance that has previously demonstrated to facilitate regular patient breathing. The clinical benefits of audiovisual biofeedback will be investigated in an upcoming multi-institutional, randomised, and stratified clinical trial recruiting a total of 75 lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: To comprehensively perform a clinical evaluation of the audiovisual biofeedback system, a multi-institutional study will be performed. Our methodological framework will be based on the widely used Technology Acceptance Model, which gives qualitative scales for two specific variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which are fundamental determinants for user acceptance. A total of 75 lung cancer patients will be recruited across seven radiation oncology departments across Australia. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio, with 2/3 of the patients being recruited into the intervention arm and 1/3 in the control arm. 2:1 randomisation is appropriate as within the interventional arm there is a screening procedure where only patients whose breathing is more regular with audiovisual biofeedback will continue to use this system for their imaging and treatment procedures. Patients within the intervention arm whose free breathing is more regular than audiovisual biofeedback in the screen procedure will remain in the intervention arm of the study but their imaging and treatment procedures will be performed without audiovisual biofeedback. Patients will also be stratified by treating institution and for treatment intent (palliative vs. radical) to ensure similar balance in the arms across the sites. Patients and hospital staff operating the audiovisual biofeedback system will complete questionnaires to assess their experience with audiovisual biofeedback. The objectives of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of audiovisual biofeedback on breathing motion, the patient experience and clinical confidence in the system, clinical workflow, treatment margins, and toxicity outcomes. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial marks an important milestone in breathing guidance studies as it will be the first randomised, controlled trial providing the most comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of breathing guidance on cancer radiation therapy to date. This study is powered to determine the impact of AV biofeedback on breathing regularity and medical image quality. Objectives such as determining the indications and contra-indications for the use of AV biofeedback, evaluation of patient experience, radiation toxicity occurrence and severity, and clinician confidence will shed light on the design of future phase III clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), its trial ID is ACTRN12613001177741. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4506585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45065852015-07-19 Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial Pollock, Sean O’Brien, Ricky Makhija, Kuldeep Hegi-Johnson, Fiona Ludbrook, Jane Rezo, Angela Tse, Regina Eade, Thomas Yeghiaian-Alvandi, Roland Gebski, Val Keall, Paul J BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is a clear link between irregular breathing and errors in medical imaging and radiation treatment. The audiovisual biofeedback system is an advanced form of respiratory guidance that has previously demonstrated to facilitate regular patient breathing. The clinical benefits of audiovisual biofeedback will be investigated in an upcoming multi-institutional, randomised, and stratified clinical trial recruiting a total of 75 lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: To comprehensively perform a clinical evaluation of the audiovisual biofeedback system, a multi-institutional study will be performed. Our methodological framework will be based on the widely used Technology Acceptance Model, which gives qualitative scales for two specific variables, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which are fundamental determinants for user acceptance. A total of 75 lung cancer patients will be recruited across seven radiation oncology departments across Australia. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio, with 2/3 of the patients being recruited into the intervention arm and 1/3 in the control arm. 2:1 randomisation is appropriate as within the interventional arm there is a screening procedure where only patients whose breathing is more regular with audiovisual biofeedback will continue to use this system for their imaging and treatment procedures. Patients within the intervention arm whose free breathing is more regular than audiovisual biofeedback in the screen procedure will remain in the intervention arm of the study but their imaging and treatment procedures will be performed without audiovisual biofeedback. Patients will also be stratified by treating institution and for treatment intent (palliative vs. radical) to ensure similar balance in the arms across the sites. Patients and hospital staff operating the audiovisual biofeedback system will complete questionnaires to assess their experience with audiovisual biofeedback. The objectives of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of audiovisual biofeedback on breathing motion, the patient experience and clinical confidence in the system, clinical workflow, treatment margins, and toxicity outcomes. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial marks an important milestone in breathing guidance studies as it will be the first randomised, controlled trial providing the most comprehensive evaluation of the clinical impact of breathing guidance on cancer radiation therapy to date. This study is powered to determine the impact of AV biofeedback on breathing regularity and medical image quality. Objectives such as determining the indications and contra-indications for the use of AV biofeedback, evaluation of patient experience, radiation toxicity occurrence and severity, and clinician confidence will shed light on the design of future phase III clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), its trial ID is ACTRN12613001177741. BioMed Central 2015-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4506585/ /pubmed/26187714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1483-7 Text en © Pollock et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Pollock, Sean O’Brien, Ricky Makhija, Kuldeep Hegi-Johnson, Fiona Ludbrook, Jane Rezo, Angela Tse, Regina Eade, Thomas Yeghiaian-Alvandi, Roland Gebski, Val Keall, Paul J Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title | Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase II randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | audiovisual biofeedback breathing guidance for lung cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a multi-institutional phase ii randomised clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1483-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollocksean audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT obrienricky audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT makhijakuldeep audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT hegijohnsonfiona audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT ludbrookjane audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT rezoangela audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT tseregina audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT eadethomas audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT yeghiaianalvandiroland audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT gebskival audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial AT keallpaulj audiovisualbiofeedbackbreathingguidanceforlungcancerpatientsreceivingradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalphaseiirandomisedclinicaltrial |