Cargando…

A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring

Wound healing after dermal injury is an imperfect process, inevitably leading to scar formation as the skin re-establishes its integrity. The resulting scars have different characteristics to normal skin, ranging from fine-line asymptomatic scars to problematic scarring including hypertrophic and ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sidgwick, G. P., McGeorge, D., Bayat, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1572-0
_version_ 1782381727526682624
author Sidgwick, G. P.
McGeorge, D.
Bayat, A.
author_facet Sidgwick, G. P.
McGeorge, D.
Bayat, A.
author_sort Sidgwick, G. P.
collection PubMed
description Wound healing after dermal injury is an imperfect process, inevitably leading to scar formation as the skin re-establishes its integrity. The resulting scars have different characteristics to normal skin, ranging from fine-line asymptomatic scars to problematic scarring including hypertrophic and keloid scars. Scars appear as a different colour to the surrounding skin and can be flat, stretched, depressed or raised, manifesting a range of symptoms including inflammation, erythema, dryness and pruritus, which can result in significant psychosocial impact on patients and their quality of life. In this paper, a comprehensive literature review coupled with an analysis of levels of evidence (LOE) for each published treatment type was conducted. Topical treatments identified include imiquimod, mitomycin C and plant extracts such as onion extract, green tea, Aloe vera, vitamin E and D, applied to healing wounds, mature scar tissue or fibrotic scars following revision surgery, or in combination with other more established treatments such as steroid injections and silicone. In total, 39 articles were included, involving 1703 patients. There was limited clinical evidence to support their efficacy; the majority of articles (n = 23) were ranked as category 4 LOE, being of limited quality with individual flaws, including low patient numbers, poor randomisation, blinding, and short follow-up periods. As trials were performed in different settings, they were difficult to compare. In conclusion, there is an unmet clinical need for effective solutions to skin scarring, more robust long-term randomised trials and a consensus on a standardised treatment regime to address all aspects of scarring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4506744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45067442015-07-22 A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring Sidgwick, G. P. McGeorge, D. Bayat, A. Arch Dermatol Res Review Wound healing after dermal injury is an imperfect process, inevitably leading to scar formation as the skin re-establishes its integrity. The resulting scars have different characteristics to normal skin, ranging from fine-line asymptomatic scars to problematic scarring including hypertrophic and keloid scars. Scars appear as a different colour to the surrounding skin and can be flat, stretched, depressed or raised, manifesting a range of symptoms including inflammation, erythema, dryness and pruritus, which can result in significant psychosocial impact on patients and their quality of life. In this paper, a comprehensive literature review coupled with an analysis of levels of evidence (LOE) for each published treatment type was conducted. Topical treatments identified include imiquimod, mitomycin C and plant extracts such as onion extract, green tea, Aloe vera, vitamin E and D, applied to healing wounds, mature scar tissue or fibrotic scars following revision surgery, or in combination with other more established treatments such as steroid injections and silicone. In total, 39 articles were included, involving 1703 patients. There was limited clinical evidence to support their efficacy; the majority of articles (n = 23) were ranked as category 4 LOE, being of limited quality with individual flaws, including low patient numbers, poor randomisation, blinding, and short follow-up periods. As trials were performed in different settings, they were difficult to compare. In conclusion, there is an unmet clinical need for effective solutions to skin scarring, more robust long-term randomised trials and a consensus on a standardised treatment regime to address all aspects of scarring. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-06-05 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4506744/ /pubmed/26044054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1572-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Sidgwick, G. P.
McGeorge, D.
Bayat, A.
A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title_full A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title_fullStr A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title_short A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
title_sort comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-015-1572-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sidgwickgp acomprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring
AT mcgeorged acomprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring
AT bayata acomprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring
AT sidgwickgp comprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring
AT mcgeorged comprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring
AT bayata comprehensiveevidencebasedreviewontheroleoftopicalsanddressingsinthemanagementofskinscarring