Cargando…

Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey

OBJECTIVE: Among Australian smokers, to examine associations between cigarette brand switching, quitting activity and possible causal directions by lagging the relationships in different directions. METHODS: Current smokers from nine waves (2002 to early 2012) of the ITC-4 Country Survey Australian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowie, Genevieve A., Swift, Elena, Partos, Timea, Borland, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12323
_version_ 1782381746372739072
author Cowie, Genevieve A.
Swift, Elena
Partos, Timea
Borland, Ron
author_facet Cowie, Genevieve A.
Swift, Elena
Partos, Timea
Borland, Ron
author_sort Cowie, Genevieve A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Among Australian smokers, to examine associations between cigarette brand switching, quitting activity and possible causal directions by lagging the relationships in different directions. METHODS: Current smokers from nine waves (2002 to early 2012) of the ITC-4 Country Survey Australian dataset were surveyed. Measures were brand switching, both brand family and product type (roll-your-own versus factory-made cigarettes) reported in adjacent waves, interest in quitting, recent quit attempts, and one month sustained abstinence. RESULTS: Switching at one interval was unrelated to concurrent quit interest. Quit interest predicted switching at the following interval, but the effect disappeared once subsequent quit attempts were controlled for. Recent quit attempts more strongly predicted switching at concurrent (OR 1.34, 95% CI=1.18–1.52, p<0.001) and subsequent intervals (OR 1.31, 95% CI= 1.12–1.53, p=0.001) than switching predicted quit attempts, with greater asymmetry when both types of switching were combined. One month sustained abstinence and switching were unrelated in the same interval; however after controlling for concurrent switching and excluding type switchers, sustained abstinence predicted lower chance of switching at the following interval (OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.47–0.93, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetry suggests brand switching does not affect subsequent quitting. IMPLICATIONS: Brand switching does not appear to interfere with quitting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4506928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45069282016-04-01 Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey Cowie, Genevieve A. Swift, Elena Partos, Timea Borland, Ron Aust N Z J Public Health Article OBJECTIVE: Among Australian smokers, to examine associations between cigarette brand switching, quitting activity and possible causal directions by lagging the relationships in different directions. METHODS: Current smokers from nine waves (2002 to early 2012) of the ITC-4 Country Survey Australian dataset were surveyed. Measures were brand switching, both brand family and product type (roll-your-own versus factory-made cigarettes) reported in adjacent waves, interest in quitting, recent quit attempts, and one month sustained abstinence. RESULTS: Switching at one interval was unrelated to concurrent quit interest. Quit interest predicted switching at the following interval, but the effect disappeared once subsequent quit attempts were controlled for. Recent quit attempts more strongly predicted switching at concurrent (OR 1.34, 95% CI=1.18–1.52, p<0.001) and subsequent intervals (OR 1.31, 95% CI= 1.12–1.53, p=0.001) than switching predicted quit attempts, with greater asymmetry when both types of switching were combined. One month sustained abstinence and switching were unrelated in the same interval; however after controlling for concurrent switching and excluding type switchers, sustained abstinence predicted lower chance of switching at the following interval (OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.47–0.93, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetry suggests brand switching does not affect subsequent quitting. IMPLICATIONS: Brand switching does not appear to interfere with quitting. 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4506928/ /pubmed/25827182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12323 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
spellingShingle Article
Cowie, Genevieve A.
Swift, Elena
Partos, Timea
Borland, Ron
Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title_full Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title_fullStr Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title_full_unstemmed Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title_short Quitting activity and tobacco brand Switching: findings from the ITC-4 Country Survey
title_sort quitting activity and tobacco brand switching: findings from the itc-4 country survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25827182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12323
work_keys_str_mv AT cowiegenevievea quittingactivityandtobaccobrandswitchingfindingsfromtheitc4countrysurvey
AT swiftelena quittingactivityandtobaccobrandswitchingfindingsfromtheitc4countrysurvey
AT partostimea quittingactivityandtobaccobrandswitchingfindingsfromtheitc4countrysurvey
AT borlandron quittingactivityandtobaccobrandswitchingfindingsfromtheitc4countrysurvey