Cargando…

Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain provides important outcome measures in the longitudinal evaluation of disease activity and progression in MS subjects. Two common measures derived from brain MRI scans are the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and T2 hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chua, Alicia S., Egorova, Svetlana, Anderson, Mark C., Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann, Chitnis, Tanuja, Weiner, Howard L., Guttmann, Charles R.G., Bakshi, Rohit, Healy, Brian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009
_version_ 1782381747488423936
author Chua, Alicia S.
Egorova, Svetlana
Anderson, Mark C.
Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann
Chitnis, Tanuja
Weiner, Howard L.
Guttmann, Charles R.G.
Bakshi, Rohit
Healy, Brian C.
author_facet Chua, Alicia S.
Egorova, Svetlana
Anderson, Mark C.
Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann
Chitnis, Tanuja
Weiner, Howard L.
Guttmann, Charles R.G.
Bakshi, Rohit
Healy, Brian C.
author_sort Chua, Alicia S.
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain provides important outcome measures in the longitudinal evaluation of disease activity and progression in MS subjects. Two common measures derived from brain MRI scans are the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and T2 hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), and these measures are routinely assessed longitudinally in clinical trials and observational studies. When measuring each outcome longitudinally, observed changes may be potentially confounded by variability in MRI acquisition parameters between scans. In order to accurately model longitudinal change, the acquisition parameters should thus be considered in statistical models. In this paper, several models for including protocol as well as individual MRI acquisition parameters in linear mixed models were compared using a large dataset of 3453 longitudinal MRI scans from 1341 subjects enrolled in the CLIMB study, and model fit indices were compared across the models. The model that best explained the variance in BPF data was a random intercept and random slope with protocol specific residual variance along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. The model that best explained the variance in T2LV was a random intercept and random slope along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. In light of these findings, future studies pertaining to BPF and T2LV outcomes should carefully account for the protocol factors within longitudinal models to ensure that the disease trajectory of MS subjects can be assessed more accurately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4506959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45069592015-07-21 Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models Chua, Alicia S. Egorova, Svetlana Anderson, Mark C. Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann Chitnis, Tanuja Weiner, Howard L. Guttmann, Charles R.G. Bakshi, Rohit Healy, Brian C. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain provides important outcome measures in the longitudinal evaluation of disease activity and progression in MS subjects. Two common measures derived from brain MRI scans are the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and T2 hyperintense lesion volume (T2LV), and these measures are routinely assessed longitudinally in clinical trials and observational studies. When measuring each outcome longitudinally, observed changes may be potentially confounded by variability in MRI acquisition parameters between scans. In order to accurately model longitudinal change, the acquisition parameters should thus be considered in statistical models. In this paper, several models for including protocol as well as individual MRI acquisition parameters in linear mixed models were compared using a large dataset of 3453 longitudinal MRI scans from 1341 subjects enrolled in the CLIMB study, and model fit indices were compared across the models. The model that best explained the variance in BPF data was a random intercept and random slope with protocol specific residual variance along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. The model that best explained the variance in T2LV was a random intercept and random slope along with the following fixed-effects: baseline age, baseline disease duration, protocol and study time. In light of these findings, future studies pertaining to BPF and T2LV outcomes should carefully account for the protocol factors within longitudinal models to ensure that the disease trajectory of MS subjects can be assessed more accurately. Elsevier 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4506959/ /pubmed/26199872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Chua, Alicia S.
Egorova, Svetlana
Anderson, Mark C.
Polgar-Turcsanyi, Mariann
Chitnis, Tanuja
Weiner, Howard L.
Guttmann, Charles R.G.
Bakshi, Rohit
Healy, Brian C.
Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title_full Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title_fullStr Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title_full_unstemmed Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title_short Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models
title_sort handling changes in mri acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: comparison of linear mixed-effect models
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4506959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.009
work_keys_str_mv AT chuaalicias handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT egorovasvetlana handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT andersonmarkc handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT polgarturcsanyimariann handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT chitnistanuja handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT weinerhowardl handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT guttmanncharlesrg handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT bakshirohit handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels
AT healybrianc handlingchangesinmriacquisitionparametersinmodelingwholebrainlesionvolumeandatrophydatainmultiplesclerosissubjectscomparisonoflinearmixedeffectmodels