Cargando…

Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/dextran) and 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of ocular surface disease in patients using antiglaucoma drugs containing preservatives. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prabhasawat, Pinnita, Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae, Tesavibul, Nattaporn, Thewthong, Maneerat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26090941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2014.0115
_version_ 1782381767993327616
author Prabhasawat, Pinnita
Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae
Tesavibul, Nattaporn
Thewthong, Maneerat
author_facet Prabhasawat, Pinnita
Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae
Tesavibul, Nattaporn
Thewthong, Maneerat
author_sort Prabhasawat, Pinnita
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/dextran) and 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of ocular surface disease in patients using antiglaucoma drugs containing preservatives. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in 70 glaucoma patients with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score greater than 20 points and/or presence of ocular signs. Patients were randomized to receive either preservative-free 0.3% HPMC/dextran (n=35) or preservative-free 0.18% SH (n=35). Treatment was 1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day. Data were collected at baseline, at day 7 and day 28. Results: The groups were homogeneous at baseline. At day 28, both treatments showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the mean OSDI score, lid skin and lid margin inflammation, conjunctival injection, and expressibility of meibomian glands, corneal staining score, fluorescein tear breakup time (FBUT), and Schirmer I test. However, the mean OSDI score, lid margin inflammation and conjunctival injection showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the SH group at days 7 and 28, compared to the HPMC/dextran group. FBUT and the Schirmer I test also showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the SH group compared to the HPMC/dextran group, at day 28. No adverse reactions were observed in either group. Conclusions: Preservative-free artificial tear, 0.3% HPMC/dextran, and 0.18% SH, caused a significant relief of the ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. However, 0.18% SH led to a greater improvement in ocular signs and symptoms than 0.3% HPMC/dextran.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4507088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45070882015-09-23 Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study Prabhasawat, Pinnita Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae Tesavibul, Nattaporn Thewthong, Maneerat J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Original Articles Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran (HPMC/dextran) and 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (SH) in the treatment of ocular surface disease in patients using antiglaucoma drugs containing preservatives. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in 70 glaucoma patients with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score greater than 20 points and/or presence of ocular signs. Patients were randomized to receive either preservative-free 0.3% HPMC/dextran (n=35) or preservative-free 0.18% SH (n=35). Treatment was 1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day. Data were collected at baseline, at day 7 and day 28. Results: The groups were homogeneous at baseline. At day 28, both treatments showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the mean OSDI score, lid skin and lid margin inflammation, conjunctival injection, and expressibility of meibomian glands, corneal staining score, fluorescein tear breakup time (FBUT), and Schirmer I test. However, the mean OSDI score, lid margin inflammation and conjunctival injection showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the SH group at days 7 and 28, compared to the HPMC/dextran group. FBUT and the Schirmer I test also showed significant improvements (P<0.05) in the SH group compared to the HPMC/dextran group, at day 28. No adverse reactions were observed in either group. Conclusions: Preservative-free artificial tear, 0.3% HPMC/dextran, and 0.18% SH, caused a significant relief of the ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. However, 0.18% SH led to a greater improvement in ocular signs and symptoms than 0.3% HPMC/dextran. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2015-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4507088/ /pubmed/26090941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2014.0115 Text en © Prabhasawat et al., 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Prabhasawat, Pinnita
Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae
Tesavibul, Nattaporn
Thewthong, Maneerat
Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title_full Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title_fullStr Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title_short Effect of 0.3% Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose/Dextran Versus 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Controlled Study
title_sort effect of 0.3% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/dextran versus 0.18% sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26090941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2014.0115
work_keys_str_mv AT prabhasawatpinnita effectof03hydroxypropylmethylcellulosedextranversus018sodiumhyaluronateinthetreatmentofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindandcontrolledstudy
AT ruangvaravatengamkae effectof03hydroxypropylmethylcellulosedextranversus018sodiumhyaluronateinthetreatmentofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindandcontrolledstudy
AT tesavibulnattaporn effectof03hydroxypropylmethylcellulosedextranversus018sodiumhyaluronateinthetreatmentofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindandcontrolledstudy
AT thewthongmaneerat effectof03hydroxypropylmethylcellulosedextranversus018sodiumhyaluronateinthetreatmentofocularsurfacediseaseinglaucomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindandcontrolledstudy