Cargando…

Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men

STUDY QUESTION: How potently does the novel hypothalamic stimulator of reproduction, kisspeptin, increase gonadotrophin secretion when compared with GnRH in healthy men? SUMMARY ANSWER: At the doses tested, intravenous administration of either of two major kisspeptin isoforms, kisspeptin-10 and -54,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasena, C.N., Abbara, A., Narayanaswamy, S., Comninos, A.N., Ratnasabapathy, R., Bassett, P., Mogford, J.T., Malik, Z., Calley, J., Ghatei, M.A., Bloom, S.R., Dhillo, W.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev143
_version_ 1782381783270031360
author Jayasena, C.N.
Abbara, A.
Narayanaswamy, S.
Comninos, A.N.
Ratnasabapathy, R.
Bassett, P.
Mogford, J.T.
Malik, Z.
Calley, J.
Ghatei, M.A.
Bloom, S.R.
Dhillo, W.S.
author_facet Jayasena, C.N.
Abbara, A.
Narayanaswamy, S.
Comninos, A.N.
Ratnasabapathy, R.
Bassett, P.
Mogford, J.T.
Malik, Z.
Calley, J.
Ghatei, M.A.
Bloom, S.R.
Dhillo, W.S.
author_sort Jayasena, C.N.
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: How potently does the novel hypothalamic stimulator of reproduction, kisspeptin, increase gonadotrophin secretion when compared with GnRH in healthy men? SUMMARY ANSWER: At the doses tested, intravenous administration of either of two major kisspeptin isoforms, kisspeptin-10 and -54, was associated with similar levels of gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men; however, GnRH was more potent when compared with either kisspeptin isoform. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Kisspeptin-10 and -54 are naturally occurring hormones in the kisspeptin peptide family which potently stimulates endogenous GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus, so have the potential to treat patients with reproductive disorders. Rodent studies suggest that kisspeptin-54 is more potent when compared with kisspepitn-10; however, their effects have not previously been directly compared in humans, or compared with direct pituitary stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion using GnRH. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A single-blinded placebo controlled physiological study was performed from January to December 2013. Local ethical approval was granted, and five participants were recruited to each dosing group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthy men were administered vehicle, kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH intravenously for 3 h on different study days. Each hormone was administered at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol/kg/h doses (n = 5 subjects per group). Regular blood sampling was conducted throughout the study to measure LH and FSH. Study visits were conducted at least a week apart. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Serum LH and FSH levels were ∼3-fold higher during GnRH infusion when compared with kisspeptin-10 and ∼2-fold higher when compared with kisspeptin-54 [mean area under the curve serum LH during infusion (in hours times international units per litre, h.IU/l): 10.81 ± 1.73, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-10; 14.43 ± 1.27, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-54; 34.06 ± 5.18, 1.0 nmol/kg/h GnRH, P < 0.001 versus kisspeptin-10, P < 0.01 versus kisspeptin-54]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a small sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Kisspeptin offers a novel means of stimulating the reproductive axis. Our data suggest that kisspeptin stimulates gonadotrophin secretion less potently when compared with GnRH; however, kisspeptin may stimulate gonadotrophins in a more physiological manner when compared with current therapies. Kisspeptin is emerging as a future therapeutic agent, so it is important to establish which kisspeptin hormones could be used to treat patients with infertility. Results of this study suggest that either isoform has similar effects on reproductive hormone secretion in healthy men when administered intravenously. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work is funded by grants from the MRC and NIHR and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. C.N.J. is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. A.A. is supported by Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowships. A.N.C. is supported by Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine Training Fellowship. W.S.D. is supported by an NIHR Career Development Fellowship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4507333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45073332015-07-22 Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men Jayasena, C.N. Abbara, A. Narayanaswamy, S. Comninos, A.N. Ratnasabapathy, R. Bassett, P. Mogford, J.T. Malik, Z. Calley, J. Ghatei, M.A. Bloom, S.R. Dhillo, W.S. Hum Reprod Original Articles STUDY QUESTION: How potently does the novel hypothalamic stimulator of reproduction, kisspeptin, increase gonadotrophin secretion when compared with GnRH in healthy men? SUMMARY ANSWER: At the doses tested, intravenous administration of either of two major kisspeptin isoforms, kisspeptin-10 and -54, was associated with similar levels of gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men; however, GnRH was more potent when compared with either kisspeptin isoform. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Kisspeptin-10 and -54 are naturally occurring hormones in the kisspeptin peptide family which potently stimulates endogenous GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus, so have the potential to treat patients with reproductive disorders. Rodent studies suggest that kisspeptin-54 is more potent when compared with kisspepitn-10; however, their effects have not previously been directly compared in humans, or compared with direct pituitary stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion using GnRH. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A single-blinded placebo controlled physiological study was performed from January to December 2013. Local ethical approval was granted, and five participants were recruited to each dosing group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Healthy men were administered vehicle, kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH intravenously for 3 h on different study days. Each hormone was administered at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol/kg/h doses (n = 5 subjects per group). Regular blood sampling was conducted throughout the study to measure LH and FSH. Study visits were conducted at least a week apart. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Serum LH and FSH levels were ∼3-fold higher during GnRH infusion when compared with kisspeptin-10 and ∼2-fold higher when compared with kisspeptin-54 [mean area under the curve serum LH during infusion (in hours times international units per litre, h.IU/l): 10.81 ± 1.73, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-10; 14.43 ± 1.27, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-54; 34.06 ± 5.18, 1.0 nmol/kg/h GnRH, P < 0.001 versus kisspeptin-10, P < 0.01 versus kisspeptin-54]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a small sample size. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Kisspeptin offers a novel means of stimulating the reproductive axis. Our data suggest that kisspeptin stimulates gonadotrophin secretion less potently when compared with GnRH; however, kisspeptin may stimulate gonadotrophins in a more physiological manner when compared with current therapies. Kisspeptin is emerging as a future therapeutic agent, so it is important to establish which kisspeptin hormones could be used to treat patients with infertility. Results of this study suggest that either isoform has similar effects on reproductive hormone secretion in healthy men when administered intravenously. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work is funded by grants from the MRC and NIHR and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. C.N.J. is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. A.A. is supported by Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowships. A.N.C. is supported by Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine Training Fellowship. W.S.D. is supported by an NIHR Career Development Fellowship. Oxford University Press 2015-08 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4507333/ /pubmed/26089302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev143 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jayasena, C.N.
Abbara, A.
Narayanaswamy, S.
Comninos, A.N.
Ratnasabapathy, R.
Bassett, P.
Mogford, J.T.
Malik, Z.
Calley, J.
Ghatei, M.A.
Bloom, S.R.
Dhillo, W.S.
Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title_full Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title_fullStr Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title_short Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
title_sort direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and gnrh on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev143
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasenacn directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT abbaraa directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT narayanaswamys directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT comninosan directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT ratnasabapathyr directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT bassettp directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT mogfordjt directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT malikz directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT calleyj directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT ghateima directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT bloomsr directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen
AT dhillows directcomparisonoftheeffectsofintravenouskisspeptin10kisspeptin54andgnrhongonadotrophinsecretioninhealthymen