Cargando…

Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau

Mulching and tillage are widely considered to be major practices for improving soil and water conservation where water is scarce. This paper studied the effects of FM (flat mulching), RFM (ridge-furrow mulching), SM (straw mulching), MTMC (mulching with two materials combined), MOM (mulching with ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Li-fang, Shangguan, Zhou-ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26192158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12225
_version_ 1782381788976381952
author Wang, Li-fang
Shangguan, Zhou-ping
author_facet Wang, Li-fang
Shangguan, Zhou-ping
author_sort Wang, Li-fang
collection PubMed
description Mulching and tillage are widely considered to be major practices for improving soil and water conservation where water is scarce. This paper studied the effects of FM (flat mulching), RFM (ridge-furrow mulching), SM (straw mulching), MTMC (mulching with two materials combined), MOM (mulching with other materials), NT (no-tillage) ST (subsoiling tillage) and RT (rotational tillage) on wheat yield based on a synthesis of 85 recent publications (including 2795 observations at 24 sites) in the Loess Plateau, China. This synthesis suggests that wheat yield was in the range of 259–7898 kg ha(−1) for FM and RFM. The sequence of water use efficiency (WUE) effect sizes was similar to that of wheat yield for the practices. Wheat yields were more sensitive to soil water at planting covered by plastic film, wheat straw, liquid film, water-permeable plastic film and sand compared to NT, ST and RT. RFM and RT increased the yields of wheat by 18 and 15%, respectively, and corresponding for WUE by 20.11 and 12.50%. This synthesis demonstrates that RFM was better for avoiding the risk of reduced production due to lack of precipitation; however, under conditions of better soil moisture, RT and MTMC were also economic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4507400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45074002015-07-21 Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau Wang, Li-fang Shangguan, Zhou-ping Sci Rep Article Mulching and tillage are widely considered to be major practices for improving soil and water conservation where water is scarce. This paper studied the effects of FM (flat mulching), RFM (ridge-furrow mulching), SM (straw mulching), MTMC (mulching with two materials combined), MOM (mulching with other materials), NT (no-tillage) ST (subsoiling tillage) and RT (rotational tillage) on wheat yield based on a synthesis of 85 recent publications (including 2795 observations at 24 sites) in the Loess Plateau, China. This synthesis suggests that wheat yield was in the range of 259–7898 kg ha(−1) for FM and RFM. The sequence of water use efficiency (WUE) effect sizes was similar to that of wheat yield for the practices. Wheat yields were more sensitive to soil water at planting covered by plastic film, wheat straw, liquid film, water-permeable plastic film and sand compared to NT, ST and RT. RFM and RT increased the yields of wheat by 18 and 15%, respectively, and corresponding for WUE by 20.11 and 12.50%. This synthesis demonstrates that RFM was better for avoiding the risk of reduced production due to lack of precipitation; however, under conditions of better soil moisture, RT and MTMC were also economic. Nature Publishing Group 2015-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4507400/ /pubmed/26192158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12225 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Li-fang
Shangguan, Zhou-ping
Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title_full Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title_fullStr Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title_full_unstemmed Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title_short Water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau
title_sort water–use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the loess plateau
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4507400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26192158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep12225
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglifang wateruseefficiencyofdrylandwheatinresponsetomulchingandtillagepracticesontheloessplateau
AT shangguanzhouping wateruseefficiencyofdrylandwheatinresponsetomulchingandtillagepracticesontheloessplateau