Cargando…
Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033 |
_version_ | 1782382015255937024 |
---|---|
author | Kim, R-S Moon, Y-J Gopalswamy, N Park, Y-D Kim, Y-H |
author_facet | Kim, R-S Moon, Y-J Gopalswamy, N Park, Y-D Kim, Y-H |
author_sort | Kim, R-S |
collection | PubMed |
description | To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wind conditions near Earth to improve the forecast capability. We consider the empirical solar wind criteria derived in this study (B(z) ≤ −5 nT or E(y) ≥ 3 mV/m for t≥ 2 h for moderate storms with minimum Dst less than −50 nT) and a Dst model developed by Temerin and Li (2002, 2006) (TL model). Using 55 CME-Dst pairs during 1997 to 2003, our solar wind criteria produce slightly better forecasts for 31 storm events (90%) than the forecasts based on the TL model (87%). However, the latter produces better forecasts for 24 nonstorm events (88%), while the former correctly forecasts only 71% of them. We then performed the two-step forecast. The results are as follows: (i) for 15 events that are incorrectly forecasted using CME parameters, 12 cases (80%) can be properly predicted based on solar wind conditions; (ii) if we forecast a storm when both CME and solar wind conditions are satisfied (∩), the critical success index becomes higher than that from the forecast using CME parameters alone, however, only 25 storm events (81%) are correctly forecasted; and (iii) if we forecast a storm when either set of these conditions is satisfied (∪), all geomagnetic storms are correctly forecasted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4508932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45089322015-07-24 Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition Kim, R-S Moon, Y-J Gopalswamy, N Park, Y-D Kim, Y-H Space Weather Research Articles To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wind conditions near Earth to improve the forecast capability. We consider the empirical solar wind criteria derived in this study (B(z) ≤ −5 nT or E(y) ≥ 3 mV/m for t≥ 2 h for moderate storms with minimum Dst less than −50 nT) and a Dst model developed by Temerin and Li (2002, 2006) (TL model). Using 55 CME-Dst pairs during 1997 to 2003, our solar wind criteria produce slightly better forecasts for 31 storm events (90%) than the forecasts based on the TL model (87%). However, the latter produces better forecasts for 24 nonstorm events (88%), while the former correctly forecasts only 71% of them. We then performed the two-step forecast. The results are as follows: (i) for 15 events that are incorrectly forecasted using CME parameters, 12 cases (80%) can be properly predicted based on solar wind conditions; (ii) if we forecast a storm when both CME and solar wind conditions are satisfied (∩), the critical success index becomes higher than that from the forecast using CME parameters alone, however, only 25 storm events (81%) are correctly forecasted; and (iii) if we forecast a storm when either set of these conditions is satisfied (∪), all geomagnetic storms are correctly forecasted. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-04 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4508932/ /pubmed/26213515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033 Text en ©2014. The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Kim, R-S Moon, Y-J Gopalswamy, N Park, Y-D Kim, Y-H Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title | Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title_full | Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title_fullStr | Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title_short | Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
title_sort | two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimrs twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition AT moonyj twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition AT gopalswamyn twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition AT parkyd twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition AT kimyh twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition |