Cargando…

Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition

To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, R-S, Moon, Y-J, Gopalswamy, N, Park, Y-D, Kim, Y-H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033
_version_ 1782382015255937024
author Kim, R-S
Moon, Y-J
Gopalswamy, N
Park, Y-D
Kim, Y-H
author_facet Kim, R-S
Moon, Y-J
Gopalswamy, N
Park, Y-D
Kim, Y-H
author_sort Kim, R-S
collection PubMed
description To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wind conditions near Earth to improve the forecast capability. We consider the empirical solar wind criteria derived in this study (B(z) ≤ −5 nT or E(y) ≥ 3 mV/m for t≥ 2 h for moderate storms with minimum Dst less than −50 nT) and a Dst model developed by Temerin and Li (2002, 2006) (TL model). Using 55 CME-Dst pairs during 1997 to 2003, our solar wind criteria produce slightly better forecasts for 31 storm events (90%) than the forecasts based on the TL model (87%). However, the latter produces better forecasts for 24 nonstorm events (88%), while the former correctly forecasts only 71% of them. We then performed the two-step forecast. The results are as follows: (i) for 15 events that are incorrectly forecasted using CME parameters, 12 cases (80%) can be properly predicted based on solar wind conditions; (ii) if we forecast a storm when both CME and solar wind conditions are satisfied (∩), the critical success index becomes higher than that from the forecast using CME parameters alone, however, only 25 storm events (81%) are correctly forecasted; and (iii) if we forecast a storm when either set of these conditions is satisfied (∪), all geomagnetic storms are correctly forecasted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4508932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45089322015-07-24 Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition Kim, R-S Moon, Y-J Gopalswamy, N Park, Y-D Kim, Y-H Space Weather Research Articles To forecast geomagnetic storms, we had examined initially observed parameters of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and introduced an empirical storm forecast model in a previous study. Now we suggest a two-step forecast considering not only CME parameters observed in the solar vicinity but also solar wind conditions near Earth to improve the forecast capability. We consider the empirical solar wind criteria derived in this study (B(z) ≤ −5 nT or E(y) ≥ 3 mV/m for t≥ 2 h for moderate storms with minimum Dst less than −50 nT) and a Dst model developed by Temerin and Li (2002, 2006) (TL model). Using 55 CME-Dst pairs during 1997 to 2003, our solar wind criteria produce slightly better forecasts for 31 storm events (90%) than the forecasts based on the TL model (87%). However, the latter produces better forecasts for 24 nonstorm events (88%), while the former correctly forecasts only 71% of them. We then performed the two-step forecast. The results are as follows: (i) for 15 events that are incorrectly forecasted using CME parameters, 12 cases (80%) can be properly predicted based on solar wind conditions; (ii) if we forecast a storm when both CME and solar wind conditions are satisfied (∩), the critical success index becomes higher than that from the forecast using CME parameters alone, however, only 25 storm events (81%) are correctly forecasted; and (iii) if we forecast a storm when either set of these conditions is satisfied (∪), all geomagnetic storms are correctly forecasted. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-04 2014-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4508932/ /pubmed/26213515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033 Text en ©2014. The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kim, R-S
Moon, Y-J
Gopalswamy, N
Park, Y-D
Kim, Y-H
Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title_full Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title_fullStr Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title_full_unstemmed Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title_short Two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
title_sort two-step forecast of geomagnetic storm using coronal mass ejection and solar wind condition
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001033
work_keys_str_mv AT kimrs twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition
AT moonyj twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition
AT gopalswamyn twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition
AT parkyd twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition
AT kimyh twostepforecastofgeomagneticstormusingcoronalmassejectionandsolarwindcondition