Cargando…

Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus

BACKGROUND: Corneal cross-linking is widely used to treat keratoconus. However, to date, only limited data from randomized trials support its efficacy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking for halting progression of keratoconus were investigated in a prospective, randomized, bli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Stefan J., Messmer, Elisabeth M., Geerling, Gerd, Mackert, Marc J., Brunner, Tobias, Dollak, Sylvia, Kutchoukov, Borislav, Böhringer, Daniel, Reinhard, Thomas, Maier, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0070-7
_version_ 1782382023383449600
author Lang, Stefan J.
Messmer, Elisabeth M.
Geerling, Gerd
Mackert, Marc J.
Brunner, Tobias
Dollak, Sylvia
Kutchoukov, Borislav
Böhringer, Daniel
Reinhard, Thomas
Maier, Philip
author_facet Lang, Stefan J.
Messmer, Elisabeth M.
Geerling, Gerd
Mackert, Marc J.
Brunner, Tobias
Dollak, Sylvia
Kutchoukov, Borislav
Böhringer, Daniel
Reinhard, Thomas
Maier, Philip
author_sort Lang, Stefan J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corneal cross-linking is widely used to treat keratoconus. However, to date, only limited data from randomized trials support its efficacy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking for halting progression of keratoconus were investigated in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo controlled, multicentre trial. Twenty-nine keratoconus patients were randomized in three trial centres. The mean age at inclusion was 28 years. Longitudinal changes in corneal refraction were assessed by linear regression. The best corrected visual acuity, surface defects and corneal inflammation were also assessed. These data were analysed with a multifactorial linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 15 eyes were randomized to the treatment and 14 to the control group. Follow-up averaged 1098 days. Corneal refractive power decreased on average (+/−standard deviation) by 0.35 +/− 0.58 dioptres/year in the treatment group. The controls showed an increase of 0.11 +/− 0.61 dioptres/year. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that corneal cross-linking is an effective treatment for some patients to halt the progression of keratoconus. However, some of the treated patients still progressed, whereas some untreated controls improved. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to decide which patients require treatment and which do not. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00626717, Date of registration: February 20, 2008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4508968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45089682015-07-22 Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus Lang, Stefan J. Messmer, Elisabeth M. Geerling, Gerd Mackert, Marc J. Brunner, Tobias Dollak, Sylvia Kutchoukov, Borislav Böhringer, Daniel Reinhard, Thomas Maier, Philip BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Corneal cross-linking is widely used to treat keratoconus. However, to date, only limited data from randomized trials support its efficacy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking for halting progression of keratoconus were investigated in a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo controlled, multicentre trial. Twenty-nine keratoconus patients were randomized in three trial centres. The mean age at inclusion was 28 years. Longitudinal changes in corneal refraction were assessed by linear regression. The best corrected visual acuity, surface defects and corneal inflammation were also assessed. These data were analysed with a multifactorial linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 15 eyes were randomized to the treatment and 14 to the control group. Follow-up averaged 1098 days. Corneal refractive power decreased on average (+/−standard deviation) by 0.35 +/− 0.58 dioptres/year in the treatment group. The controls showed an increase of 0.11 +/− 0.61 dioptres/year. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that corneal cross-linking is an effective treatment for some patients to halt the progression of keratoconus. However, some of the treated patients still progressed, whereas some untreated controls improved. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to decide which patients require treatment and which do not. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00626717, Date of registration: February 20, 2008. BioMed Central 2015-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4508968/ /pubmed/26194634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0070-7 Text en © Lang et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lang, Stefan J.
Messmer, Elisabeth M.
Geerling, Gerd
Mackert, Marc J.
Brunner, Tobias
Dollak, Sylvia
Kutchoukov, Borislav
Böhringer, Daniel
Reinhard, Thomas
Maier, Philip
Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title_full Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title_fullStr Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title_short Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
title_sort prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4508968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0070-7
work_keys_str_mv AT langstefanj prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT messmerelisabethm prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT geerlinggerd prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT mackertmarcj prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT brunnertobias prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT dollaksylvia prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT kutchoukovborislav prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT bohringerdaniel prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT reinhardthomas prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus
AT maierphilip prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindtrialtoinvestigatetheefficacyandsafetyofcornealcrosslinkingtohalttheprogressionofkeratoconus