Cargando…

The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

INTRODUCTION: Enlargement of the root canal may potentially affect efficient smear layer (SL) removal. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare SL removal following canal preparation with two different sizes/tapers by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi, Shareghi, Ameneh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213539
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.03.005
_version_ 1782382029493501952
author Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi
Shareghi, Ameneh
author_facet Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi
Shareghi, Ameneh
author_sort Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Enlargement of the root canal may potentially affect efficient smear layer (SL) removal. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare SL removal following canal preparation with two different sizes/tapers by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 extracted human mandibular premolars were decoronated. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=20) and two negative control groups. In groups 1 and 2 the sizes of master apical file (MAF) were #25 and 40, respectively. Coronal part of the canals were flared with #2 Piezo drills in group 1 and sizes #2 to 6 in group 2. Finally FlexMaster NiTi rotary instruments were used to complete canal preparation (25/0.04 and 35/0.06 in groups 1 and 2, respectively). The irrigation protocol consisted of 10 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 1 min followed by 10 mL of 5.25% NaOCl for 3 min. The patency of dentinal tubules was evaluated under SEM with Hülsmann scores. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The number of patent dentinal tubules in coronal third of the group 1 was significantly more than group 2 (P<0.001). However, this difference was not significant for the middle and apical segments. There was a significant difference in the number of patent dentinal tubules between coronal, middle and apical thirds (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Increasing the canal preparation size did not lead to better cleanliness of the canal walls and more efficient smear layer removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4509124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45091242015-07-24 The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi Shareghi, Ameneh Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Enlargement of the root canal may potentially affect efficient smear layer (SL) removal. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare SL removal following canal preparation with two different sizes/tapers by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 extracted human mandibular premolars were decoronated. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=20) and two negative control groups. In groups 1 and 2 the sizes of master apical file (MAF) were #25 and 40, respectively. Coronal part of the canals were flared with #2 Piezo drills in group 1 and sizes #2 to 6 in group 2. Finally FlexMaster NiTi rotary instruments were used to complete canal preparation (25/0.04 and 35/0.06 in groups 1 and 2, respectively). The irrigation protocol consisted of 10 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 1 min followed by 10 mL of 5.25% NaOCl for 3 min. The patency of dentinal tubules was evaluated under SEM with Hülsmann scores. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The number of patent dentinal tubules in coronal third of the group 1 was significantly more than group 2 (P<0.001). However, this difference was not significant for the middle and apical segments. There was a significant difference in the number of patent dentinal tubules between coronal, middle and apical thirds (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Increasing the canal preparation size did not lead to better cleanliness of the canal walls and more efficient smear layer removal. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2015 2015-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4509124/ /pubmed/26213539 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.03.005 Text en © 2015, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tabrizizadeh, Mehdi
Shareghi, Ameneh
The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_fullStr The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_short The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_sort effect of preparation size on efficacy of smear layer removal; a scanning electron microscopic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213539
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.03.005
work_keys_str_mv AT tabrizizadehmehdi theeffectofpreparationsizeonefficacyofsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT shareghiameneh theeffectofpreparationsizeonefficacyofsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT tabrizizadehmehdi effectofpreparationsizeonefficacyofsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT shareghiameneh effectofpreparationsizeonefficacyofsmearlayerremovalascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy