Cargando…

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review

Evidence suggests that combined gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy extends survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a systematic review in order to collate this evidence and assess whether gemcitabine-cisplatin efficacy is influenced by primary tumor site, disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Joon Oh, Oh, Do-Youn, Hsu, Chiun, Chen, Jen-Shi, Chen, Li-Tzong, Orlando, Mauro, Kim, Jong Seok, Lim, Ho Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.308
_version_ 1782382031537176576
author Park, Joon Oh
Oh, Do-Youn
Hsu, Chiun
Chen, Jen-Shi
Chen, Li-Tzong
Orlando, Mauro
Kim, Jong Seok
Lim, Ho Yeong
author_facet Park, Joon Oh
Oh, Do-Youn
Hsu, Chiun
Chen, Jen-Shi
Chen, Li-Tzong
Orlando, Mauro
Kim, Jong Seok
Lim, Ho Yeong
author_sort Park, Joon Oh
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that combined gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy extends survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a systematic review in order to collate this evidence and assess whether gemcitabine-cisplatin efficacy is influenced by primary tumor site, disease stage, or geographic region, and whether associated toxicities are related to regimen. MEDLINE (1946-search date), EMBASE (1966-search date), ClinicalTrials. gov (2008-search date), and abstracts from major oncology conferences (2009- search date) were searched (5 Dec 2013) using terms for BTC, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. All study types reporting efficacy (survival, response rates) or safety (toxicities) outcomes of gemcitabine-cisplatin in BTC were eligible for inclusion; efficacy data were extracted from prospective studies only. Evidence retrieved from one meta-analysis (abstract), four randomized controlled trials, 12 nonrandomized prospective studies, and three retrospective studies supported the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-cisplatin for BTC. Median overall survival ranged from 4.6 to 11.7 months, and response rate ranged from 17.1% to 36.6%. Toxicities were generally acceptable and manageable. Heterogeneity in study designs and data collected prevented formal meta-analysis, however exploratory assessments suggested that efficacy did not vary with primary tumor site (gallbladder vs. others), disease stage (metastatic vs. locally advanced), or geographic origin (Asia vs. other). Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was not related to gemcitabine dose or cisplatin frequency. Despite individual variation in study designs, the evidence presented suggests that gemcitabine-cisplatin is effective in patients from a diverse range of countries and with heterogeneous disease characteristics. No substantial differences in toxicity were observed among the different dosing schedules of gemcitabine and cisplatin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4509359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45093592015-07-21 Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review Park, Joon Oh Oh, Do-Youn Hsu, Chiun Chen, Jen-Shi Chen, Li-Tzong Orlando, Mauro Kim, Jong Seok Lim, Ho Yeong Cancer Res Treat Review Article Evidence suggests that combined gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy extends survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a systematic review in order to collate this evidence and assess whether gemcitabine-cisplatin efficacy is influenced by primary tumor site, disease stage, or geographic region, and whether associated toxicities are related to regimen. MEDLINE (1946-search date), EMBASE (1966-search date), ClinicalTrials. gov (2008-search date), and abstracts from major oncology conferences (2009- search date) were searched (5 Dec 2013) using terms for BTC, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. All study types reporting efficacy (survival, response rates) or safety (toxicities) outcomes of gemcitabine-cisplatin in BTC were eligible for inclusion; efficacy data were extracted from prospective studies only. Evidence retrieved from one meta-analysis (abstract), four randomized controlled trials, 12 nonrandomized prospective studies, and three retrospective studies supported the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-cisplatin for BTC. Median overall survival ranged from 4.6 to 11.7 months, and response rate ranged from 17.1% to 36.6%. Toxicities were generally acceptable and manageable. Heterogeneity in study designs and data collected prevented formal meta-analysis, however exploratory assessments suggested that efficacy did not vary with primary tumor site (gallbladder vs. others), disease stage (metastatic vs. locally advanced), or geographic origin (Asia vs. other). Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was not related to gemcitabine dose or cisplatin frequency. Despite individual variation in study designs, the evidence presented suggests that gemcitabine-cisplatin is effective in patients from a diverse range of countries and with heterogeneous disease characteristics. No substantial differences in toxicity were observed among the different dosing schedules of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Korean Cancer Association 2015-07 2015-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4509359/ /pubmed/25989801 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.308 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Park, Joon Oh
Oh, Do-Youn
Hsu, Chiun
Chen, Jen-Shi
Chen, Li-Tzong
Orlando, Mauro
Kim, Jong Seok
Lim, Ho Yeong
Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_short Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_sort gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.308
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjoonoh gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT ohdoyoun gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT hsuchiun gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT chenjenshi gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT chenlitzong gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT orlandomauro gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT kimjongseok gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview
AT limhoyeong gemcitabinepluscisplatinforadvancedbiliarytractcancerasystematicreview