Cargando…
Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems
Multiple rotating annular reactors were seeded with biofilms flushed from water distribution systems to assess (1) whether biofilms grown in bioreactors are representative of biofilms flushed from the water distribution system in terms of bacterial composition and diversity, and (2) whether the biof...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26196282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133427 |
_version_ | 1782382058778132480 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Xia Jellison, Kristen L. Huynh, Kevin Widmer, Giovanni |
author_facet | Luo, Xia Jellison, Kristen L. Huynh, Kevin Widmer, Giovanni |
author_sort | Luo, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple rotating annular reactors were seeded with biofilms flushed from water distribution systems to assess (1) whether biofilms grown in bioreactors are representative of biofilms flushed from the water distribution system in terms of bacterial composition and diversity, and (2) whether the biofilm sampling method affects the population profile of the attached bacterial community. Biofilms were grown in bioreactors until thickness stabilized (9 to 11 weeks) and harvested from reactor coupons by sonication, stomaching, bead-beating, and manual scraping. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons was used to profile bacterial populations from flushed biofilms seeded into bioreactors as well as biofilms recovered from bioreactor coupons by different methods. β diversity between flushed and reactor biofilms was compared to β diversity between (i) biofilms harvested from different reactors and (ii) biofilms harvested by different methods from the same reactor. These analyses showed that average diversity between flushed and bioreactor biofilms was double the diversity between biofilms from different reactors operated in parallel. The diversity between bioreactors was larger than the diversity associated with different biofilm recovery methods. Compared to other experimental variables, the method used to recover biofilms had a negligible impact on the outcome of water biofilm analyses based on 16S amplicon sequencing. Results from this study show that biofilms grown in reactors over 9 to 11 weeks are not representative models of the microbial populations flushed from a distribution system. Furthermore, the bacterial population profile of biofilms grown in replicate reactors from the same flushed water are likely to diverge. However, four common sampling protocols, which differ with respect to disruption of bacterial cells, provide similar information with respect to the 16S rRNA population profile of the biofilm community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4509647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45096472015-07-24 Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems Luo, Xia Jellison, Kristen L. Huynh, Kevin Widmer, Giovanni PLoS One Research Article Multiple rotating annular reactors were seeded with biofilms flushed from water distribution systems to assess (1) whether biofilms grown in bioreactors are representative of biofilms flushed from the water distribution system in terms of bacterial composition and diversity, and (2) whether the biofilm sampling method affects the population profile of the attached bacterial community. Biofilms were grown in bioreactors until thickness stabilized (9 to 11 weeks) and harvested from reactor coupons by sonication, stomaching, bead-beating, and manual scraping. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons was used to profile bacterial populations from flushed biofilms seeded into bioreactors as well as biofilms recovered from bioreactor coupons by different methods. β diversity between flushed and reactor biofilms was compared to β diversity between (i) biofilms harvested from different reactors and (ii) biofilms harvested by different methods from the same reactor. These analyses showed that average diversity between flushed and bioreactor biofilms was double the diversity between biofilms from different reactors operated in parallel. The diversity between bioreactors was larger than the diversity associated with different biofilm recovery methods. Compared to other experimental variables, the method used to recover biofilms had a negligible impact on the outcome of water biofilm analyses based on 16S amplicon sequencing. Results from this study show that biofilms grown in reactors over 9 to 11 weeks are not representative models of the microbial populations flushed from a distribution system. Furthermore, the bacterial population profile of biofilms grown in replicate reactors from the same flushed water are likely to diverge. However, four common sampling protocols, which differ with respect to disruption of bacterial cells, provide similar information with respect to the 16S rRNA population profile of the biofilm community. Public Library of Science 2015-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4509647/ /pubmed/26196282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133427 Text en © 2015 Luo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luo, Xia Jellison, Kristen L. Huynh, Kevin Widmer, Giovanni Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title | Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title_full | Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title_fullStr | Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title_short | Impact of Bioreactor Environment and Recovery Method on the Profile of Bacterial Populations from Water Distribution Systems |
title_sort | impact of bioreactor environment and recovery method on the profile of bacterial populations from water distribution systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26196282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoxia impactofbioreactorenvironmentandrecoverymethodontheprofileofbacterialpopulationsfromwaterdistributionsystems AT jellisonkristenl impactofbioreactorenvironmentandrecoverymethodontheprofileofbacterialpopulationsfromwaterdistributionsystems AT huynhkevin impactofbioreactorenvironmentandrecoverymethodontheprofileofbacterialpopulationsfromwaterdistributionsystems AT widmergiovanni impactofbioreactorenvironmentandrecoverymethodontheprofileofbacterialpopulationsfromwaterdistributionsystems |