Cargando…

Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases

BACKGROUND: Airway resistance (R(AW)) and specific airway conductance (sG(AW)) are measures that reflect the patency of airways. Little is known of the variability of these measures between different lung diseases. This study investigated the contribution of R(AW) and sG(AW) to a diagnosis of obstru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topalovic, Marko, Derom, Eric, Osadnik, Christian R., Troosters, Thierry, Decramer, Marc, Janssens, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0252-0
_version_ 1782382075408547840
author Topalovic, Marko
Derom, Eric
Osadnik, Christian R.
Troosters, Thierry
Decramer, Marc
Janssens, Wim
author_facet Topalovic, Marko
Derom, Eric
Osadnik, Christian R.
Troosters, Thierry
Decramer, Marc
Janssens, Wim
author_sort Topalovic, Marko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Airway resistance (R(AW)) and specific airway conductance (sG(AW)) are measures that reflect the patency of airways. Little is known of the variability of these measures between different lung diseases. This study investigated the contribution of R(AW) and sG(AW) to a diagnosis of obstructive airways disease and their role in differentiating asthma from COPD. METHODS: 976 subjects admitted for the first time to a pulmonary practice in Belgium were included. Clinical diagnoses were based on complete pulmonary function tests and supported by investigations of physicians’ discretion. 651 subjects had a final diagnosis of obstructive diseases, 168 had another respiratory disease and 157 subjects had no respiratory disease (healthy controls). RESULTS: R(AW) and sG(AW) were significantly different (p < 0.0001) between obstructive and other groups. Abnormal R(AW) and sG(AW) were found in 39 % and 18 % of the population, respectively, in which 81 % and 90 % had diagnosed airway obstruction. Multiple regression revealed sG(AW) to be a significant and independent predictor of an obstructive disorder. To differentiate asthma from COPD, R(AW) was found to be more relevant and statistically significant. In asthma patients with normal FEV(1)/FVC ratio, both R(AW) and sG(AW) were more specific than sensitive diagnostic tests in differentiating asthma from healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: R(AW) and sG(AW) are significant factors that contribute to the diagnosis and differentiation of obstructive airways diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4509748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45097482015-07-23 Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases Topalovic, Marko Derom, Eric Osadnik, Christian R. Troosters, Thierry Decramer, Marc Janssens, Wim Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Airway resistance (R(AW)) and specific airway conductance (sG(AW)) are measures that reflect the patency of airways. Little is known of the variability of these measures between different lung diseases. This study investigated the contribution of R(AW) and sG(AW) to a diagnosis of obstructive airways disease and their role in differentiating asthma from COPD. METHODS: 976 subjects admitted for the first time to a pulmonary practice in Belgium were included. Clinical diagnoses were based on complete pulmonary function tests and supported by investigations of physicians’ discretion. 651 subjects had a final diagnosis of obstructive diseases, 168 had another respiratory disease and 157 subjects had no respiratory disease (healthy controls). RESULTS: R(AW) and sG(AW) were significantly different (p < 0.0001) between obstructive and other groups. Abnormal R(AW) and sG(AW) were found in 39 % and 18 % of the population, respectively, in which 81 % and 90 % had diagnosed airway obstruction. Multiple regression revealed sG(AW) to be a significant and independent predictor of an obstructive disorder. To differentiate asthma from COPD, R(AW) was found to be more relevant and statistically significant. In asthma patients with normal FEV(1)/FVC ratio, both R(AW) and sG(AW) were more specific than sensitive diagnostic tests in differentiating asthma from healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: R(AW) and sG(AW) are significant factors that contribute to the diagnosis and differentiation of obstructive airways diseases. BioMed Central 2015-07-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4509748/ /pubmed/26194099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0252-0 Text en © Topalovic et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Topalovic, Marko
Derom, Eric
Osadnik, Christian R.
Troosters, Thierry
Decramer, Marc
Janssens, Wim
Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title_full Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title_fullStr Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title_full_unstemmed Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title_short Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
title_sort airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0252-0
work_keys_str_mv AT topalovicmarko airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT deromeric airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT osadnikchristianr airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT troostersthierry airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT decramermarc airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT janssenswim airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases
AT airwaysresistanceandspecificconductanceforthediagnosisofobstructiveairwaysdiseases