Cargando…

Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom

Velocity measurement errors were investigated for an array-based preclinical ultrasound scanner (Vevo 2100, FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada). Using a small-size rotating phantom made from a tissue-mimicking material, errors in pulse-wave Doppler maximum velocity measurements were observed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenwright, David A., Anderson, Tom, Moran, Carmel M., Hoskins, Peter R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25957754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.006
_version_ 1782382128573448192
author Kenwright, David A.
Anderson, Tom
Moran, Carmel M.
Hoskins, Peter R.
author_facet Kenwright, David A.
Anderson, Tom
Moran, Carmel M.
Hoskins, Peter R.
author_sort Kenwright, David A.
collection PubMed
description Velocity measurement errors were investigated for an array-based preclinical ultrasound scanner (Vevo 2100, FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada). Using a small-size rotating phantom made from a tissue-mimicking material, errors in pulse-wave Doppler maximum velocity measurements were observed. The extent of these errors was dependent on the Doppler angle, gate length, gate depth, gate horizontal placement and phantom velocity. Errors were observed to be up to 172% at high beam–target angles. It was found that small gate lengths resulted in larger velocity errors than large gate lengths, a phenomenon that has not previously been reported (e.g., for a beam–target angle of 0°, the error was 27.8% with a 0.2-mm gate length and 5.4% with a 0.98-mm gate length). The error in the velocity measurement with sample volume depth changed depending on the operating frequency of the probe. Some edge effects were observed in the horizontal placement of the sample volume, indicating a change in the array aperture size. The error in the velocity measurements increased with increased phantom velocity, from 22% at 2.4 cm/s to 30% at 26.6 cm/s. To minimise the impact of these errors, an angle-dependent correction factor was derived based on a simple ray model of geometric spectral broadening. Use of this angle-dependent correction factor reduces the maximum velocity measurement errors to <25% in all instances, significantly improving the current estimation of maximum velocity from pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4510153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45101532015-08-07 Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom Kenwright, David A. Anderson, Tom Moran, Carmel M. Hoskins, Peter R. Ultrasound Med Biol Original Contribution Velocity measurement errors were investigated for an array-based preclinical ultrasound scanner (Vevo 2100, FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Toronto, ON, Canada). Using a small-size rotating phantom made from a tissue-mimicking material, errors in pulse-wave Doppler maximum velocity measurements were observed. The extent of these errors was dependent on the Doppler angle, gate length, gate depth, gate horizontal placement and phantom velocity. Errors were observed to be up to 172% at high beam–target angles. It was found that small gate lengths resulted in larger velocity errors than large gate lengths, a phenomenon that has not previously been reported (e.g., for a beam–target angle of 0°, the error was 27.8% with a 0.2-mm gate length and 5.4% with a 0.98-mm gate length). The error in the velocity measurement with sample volume depth changed depending on the operating frequency of the probe. Some edge effects were observed in the horizontal placement of the sample volume, indicating a change in the array aperture size. The error in the velocity measurements increased with increased phantom velocity, from 22% at 2.4 cm/s to 30% at 26.6 cm/s. To minimise the impact of these errors, an angle-dependent correction factor was derived based on a simple ray model of geometric spectral broadening. Use of this angle-dependent correction factor reduces the maximum velocity measurement errors to <25% in all instances, significantly improving the current estimation of maximum velocity from pulse-wave Doppler ultrasound. Pergamon Press 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4510153/ /pubmed/25957754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.006 Text en © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Kenwright, David A.
Anderson, Tom
Moran, Carmel M.
Hoskins, Peter R.
Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title_full Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title_fullStr Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title_short Assessment of Spectral Doppler for an Array-Based Preclinical Ultrasound Scanner Using a Rotating Phantom
title_sort assessment of spectral doppler for an array-based preclinical ultrasound scanner using a rotating phantom
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25957754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.006
work_keys_str_mv AT kenwrightdavida assessmentofspectraldopplerforanarraybasedpreclinicalultrasoundscannerusingarotatingphantom
AT andersontom assessmentofspectraldopplerforanarraybasedpreclinicalultrasoundscannerusingarotatingphantom
AT morancarmelm assessmentofspectraldopplerforanarraybasedpreclinicalultrasoundscannerusingarotatingphantom
AT hoskinspeterr assessmentofspectraldopplerforanarraybasedpreclinicalultrasoundscannerusingarotatingphantom