Cargando…
Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks
There is much behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in support of the idea that seeing a tool activates motor components of action related to the perceived object (e.g., grasping, use manipulation). However, the question remains as to whether the processing of the motor components associated wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031 |
_version_ | 1782382142268899328 |
---|---|
author | Rey, Amandine E. Roche, Kévin Versace, Rémy Chainay, Hanna |
author_facet | Rey, Amandine E. Roche, Kévin Versace, Rémy Chainay, Hanna |
author_sort | Rey, Amandine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is much behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in support of the idea that seeing a tool activates motor components of action related to the perceived object (e.g., grasping, use manipulation). However, the question remains as to whether the processing of the motor components associated with the tool is automatic or depends on the situation, including the task and the modality of tool presentation. The present study investigated whether the activation of motor components involved in tool use in response to the simple perception of a tool is influenced by the link between prime and target tools, as well as by the modality of presentation, in perceptual or motor tasks. To explore this issue, we manipulated the similarity of gesture involved in the use of the prime and target (identical, similar, different) with two tool presentation modalities of the presentation tool (visual or auditory) in perceptual and motor tasks. Across the experiments, we also manipulated the relevance of the prime (i.e., associated or not with the current task). The participants saw a first tool (or heard the sound it makes), which was immediately followed by a second tool on which they had to perform a perceptual task (i.e., indicate whether the second tool was identical to or different from the first tool) or a motor task (i.e., manipulate the second tool as if it were the first tool). In both tasks, the similarity between the gestures employed for the first and the second tool was manipulated (Identical, Similar or Different gestures). The results showed that responses were faster when the manipulation gestures for the two tools were identical or similar, but only in the motor task. This effect was observed irrespective of the modality of presentation of the first tool, i.e., visual or auditory. We suggest that the influence of manipulation gesture on response time depends on the relevance of the first tool in motor tasks. We discuss these motor activation results in terms of the relevance and demands of the tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4510311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45103112015-08-07 Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks Rey, Amandine E. Roche, Kévin Versace, Rémy Chainay, Hanna Front Psychol Psychology There is much behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in support of the idea that seeing a tool activates motor components of action related to the perceived object (e.g., grasping, use manipulation). However, the question remains as to whether the processing of the motor components associated with the tool is automatic or depends on the situation, including the task and the modality of tool presentation. The present study investigated whether the activation of motor components involved in tool use in response to the simple perception of a tool is influenced by the link between prime and target tools, as well as by the modality of presentation, in perceptual or motor tasks. To explore this issue, we manipulated the similarity of gesture involved in the use of the prime and target (identical, similar, different) with two tool presentation modalities of the presentation tool (visual or auditory) in perceptual and motor tasks. Across the experiments, we also manipulated the relevance of the prime (i.e., associated or not with the current task). The participants saw a first tool (or heard the sound it makes), which was immediately followed by a second tool on which they had to perform a perceptual task (i.e., indicate whether the second tool was identical to or different from the first tool) or a motor task (i.e., manipulate the second tool as if it were the first tool). In both tasks, the similarity between the gestures employed for the first and the second tool was manipulated (Identical, Similar or Different gestures). The results showed that responses were faster when the manipulation gestures for the two tools were identical or similar, but only in the motor task. This effect was observed irrespective of the modality of presentation of the first tool, i.e., visual or auditory. We suggest that the influence of manipulation gesture on response time depends on the relevance of the first tool in motor tasks. We discuss these motor activation results in terms of the relevance and demands of the tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4510311/ /pubmed/26257687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031 Text en Copyright © 2015 Rey, Roche, Versace and Chainay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Rey, Amandine E. Roche, Kévin Versace, Rémy Chainay, Hanna Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title | Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title_full | Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title_fullStr | Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title_short | Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
title_sort | manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reyamandinee manipulationgestureeffectinvisualandauditorypresentationsthelinkbetweentoolsinperceptualandmotortasks AT rochekevin manipulationgestureeffectinvisualandauditorypresentationsthelinkbetweentoolsinperceptualandmotortasks AT versaceremy manipulationgestureeffectinvisualandauditorypresentationsthelinkbetweentoolsinperceptualandmotortasks AT chainayhanna manipulationgestureeffectinvisualandauditorypresentationsthelinkbetweentoolsinperceptualandmotortasks |