Cargando…

Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures

BACKGROUND: Many pediatric forearm fractures can be treated in plaster following closed reduction. The cast index (CI, a ratio of anteroposterior to lateral internal diameters of the cast at the fracture site) is a simple, reliable marker of quality of molding and a CI of >0.8 correlates with inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser, Malhotra, Karan, Wright, Phil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229159
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159609
_version_ 1782382241768275968
author Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser
Malhotra, Karan
Wright, Phil
author_facet Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser
Malhotra, Karan
Wright, Phil
author_sort Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many pediatric forearm fractures can be treated in plaster following closed reduction. The cast index (CI, a ratio of anteroposterior to lateral internal diameters of the cast at the fracture site) is a simple, reliable marker of quality of molding and a CI of >0.8 correlates with increased risk of redisplacement. Previously, CI has been applied to all forearm fractures. We hypothesize that an acceptable CI is more difficult to achieve and does not predict outcome in fractures of the proximal forearm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventynine cases of pediatric forearm fractures initially treated by manipulation alone over a year were included in this retrospective radiographic analysis. The CI was calculated from the post manipulation radiographs. All fractures were divided as either proximal or distal half forearm based on the location of the radius fracture. Subsequent radiographs were reviewed to assess redisplacement and reoperation. RESULTS: The mean CI was 0.77. Remanipulation was required in five cases (6%), all distal half fractures – mean CI 0.79. CI was higher in proximal half forearm fractures (0.83 vs. 0.76, P = 0.006), nonetheless these fractures did not re-displace more than distal fractures. CONCLUSION: Cast index is useful in predicting redisplacement of manipulated distal forearm fractures. We found that in proximal half forearm fractures it is difficult to achieve a CI of <0.8, but increased CI does not predict loss of position in these fractures. We therefore discourage the use of CI in proximal half forearm fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4510792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45107922015-07-30 Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser Malhotra, Karan Wright, Phil Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Many pediatric forearm fractures can be treated in plaster following closed reduction. The cast index (CI, a ratio of anteroposterior to lateral internal diameters of the cast at the fracture site) is a simple, reliable marker of quality of molding and a CI of >0.8 correlates with increased risk of redisplacement. Previously, CI has been applied to all forearm fractures. We hypothesize that an acceptable CI is more difficult to achieve and does not predict outcome in fractures of the proximal forearm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventynine cases of pediatric forearm fractures initially treated by manipulation alone over a year were included in this retrospective radiographic analysis. The CI was calculated from the post manipulation radiographs. All fractures were divided as either proximal or distal half forearm based on the location of the radius fracture. Subsequent radiographs were reviewed to assess redisplacement and reoperation. RESULTS: The mean CI was 0.77. Remanipulation was required in five cases (6%), all distal half fractures – mean CI 0.79. CI was higher in proximal half forearm fractures (0.83 vs. 0.76, P = 0.006), nonetheless these fractures did not re-displace more than distal fractures. CONCLUSION: Cast index is useful in predicting redisplacement of manipulated distal forearm fractures. We found that in proximal half forearm fractures it is difficult to achieve a CI of <0.8, but increased CI does not predict loss of position in these fractures. We therefore discourage the use of CI in proximal half forearm fractures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4510792/ /pubmed/26229159 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159609 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sheikh, Hassaan Qaiser
Malhotra, Karan
Wright, Phil
Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title_full Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title_fullStr Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title_full_unstemmed Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title_short Cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
title_sort cast index in predicting outcome of proximal pediatric forearm fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229159
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159609
work_keys_str_mv AT sheikhhassaanqaiser castindexinpredictingoutcomeofproximalpediatricforearmfractures
AT malhotrakaran castindexinpredictingoutcomeofproximalpediatricforearmfractures
AT wrightphil castindexinpredictingoutcomeofproximalpediatricforearmfractures