Cargando…
The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand
OBJECTIVE: To assess government actions to improve the healthiness of food environments in New Zealand, based on the healthy food environment policy index. METHODS: A panel of 52 public health experts rated the extent of government implementation against international best practice for 42 indicators...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
World Health Organization
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.145540 |
_version_ | 1782382246417661952 |
---|---|
author | Vandevijvere, Stefanie Dominick, Clare Devi, Anandita Swinburn, Boyd |
author_facet | Vandevijvere, Stefanie Dominick, Clare Devi, Anandita Swinburn, Boyd |
author_sort | Vandevijvere, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess government actions to improve the healthiness of food environments in New Zealand, based on the healthy food environment policy index. METHODS: A panel of 52 public health experts rated the extent of government implementation against international best practice for 42 indicators of food environment policy and infrastructure support. Their ratings were informed by documented evidence, validated by government officials and international benchmarks. FINDINGS: There was a high level of implementation for some indicators: providing ingredient lists and nutrient declarations and regulating health claims on packaged foods; transparency in policy development; monitoring prevalence of noncommunicable diseases and monitoring risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. There was very little, if any implementation of the following indicators: restrictions on unhealthy food marketing to children; fiscal and food retail policies and protection of national food environments within trade agreements. Interrater reliability was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.76–0.79). Based on the implementation gaps, the experts recommended 34 actions, and prioritized seven of these. CONCLUSION: The healthy food environment policy index provides a useful set of indicators that can focus attention on where government action is needed. It is anticipated that this policy index will increase accountability of governments, stimulate government action and support civil society advocacy efforts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4510812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | World Health Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45108122015-07-30 The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand Vandevijvere, Stefanie Dominick, Clare Devi, Anandita Swinburn, Boyd Bull World Health Organ Research OBJECTIVE: To assess government actions to improve the healthiness of food environments in New Zealand, based on the healthy food environment policy index. METHODS: A panel of 52 public health experts rated the extent of government implementation against international best practice for 42 indicators of food environment policy and infrastructure support. Their ratings were informed by documented evidence, validated by government officials and international benchmarks. FINDINGS: There was a high level of implementation for some indicators: providing ingredient lists and nutrient declarations and regulating health claims on packaged foods; transparency in policy development; monitoring prevalence of noncommunicable diseases and monitoring risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. There was very little, if any implementation of the following indicators: restrictions on unhealthy food marketing to children; fiscal and food retail policies and protection of national food environments within trade agreements. Interrater reliability was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.76–0.79). Based on the implementation gaps, the experts recommended 34 actions, and prioritized seven of these. CONCLUSION: The healthy food environment policy index provides a useful set of indicators that can focus attention on where government action is needed. It is anticipated that this policy index will increase accountability of governments, stimulate government action and support civil society advocacy efforts. World Health Organization 2015-05-01 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4510812/ /pubmed/26229200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.145540 Text en (c) 2015 The authors; licensee World Health Organization. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Vandevijvere, Stefanie Dominick, Clare Devi, Anandita Swinburn, Boyd The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title | The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title_full | The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title_fullStr | The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title_short | The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand |
title_sort | healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in new zealand |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.145540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandevijverestefanie thehealthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT dominickclare thehealthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT devianandita thehealthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT swinburnboyd thehealthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT thehealthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT vandevijverestefanie healthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT dominickclare healthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT devianandita healthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT swinburnboyd healthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand AT healthyfoodenvironmentpolicyindexfindingsofanexpertpanelinnewzealand |