Cargando…

Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model

The optimal allocation of time and energy between one's own survival and offspring survival is critical for iteroparous animals, but creates a conflict between what maximises the parent's fitness and what maximises fitness of the offspring. For central-place foragers, provisioning strategi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoji, Akiko, Aris-Brosou, Stéphane, Fayet, Annette, Padget, Oliver, Perrins, Christopher, Guilford, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25964419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.120626
_version_ 1782382251757010944
author Shoji, Akiko
Aris-Brosou, Stéphane
Fayet, Annette
Padget, Oliver
Perrins, Christopher
Guilford, Tim
author_facet Shoji, Akiko
Aris-Brosou, Stéphane
Fayet, Annette
Padget, Oliver
Perrins, Christopher
Guilford, Tim
author_sort Shoji, Akiko
collection PubMed
description The optimal allocation of time and energy between one's own survival and offspring survival is critical for iteroparous animals, but creates a conflict between what maximises the parent's fitness and what maximises fitness of the offspring. For central-place foragers, provisioning strategies may reflect this allocation, while the distance between central-places and foraging areas may influence the decision. Nevertheless, few studies have explored the link between life history and foraging in the context of resource allocation. Studying foraging behaviour alongside food load rates to chicks provides a useful system for understanding the foraging decisions made during parent–offspring conflict. Using simultaneously deployed GPS and time–depth recorders, we examined the provisioning strategies in free-living Manx shearwaters Puffinus puffinus, which were caring for young. Our results showed a bimodal pattern, where birds alternate short and long trips. Short trips were associated with higher feeding frequency and larger meals than long trips, suggesting that long trips were performed for self-feeding. Furthermore, most foraging was carried out within 100 km of sea fronts. A simple model based on patch quality and travel time shows that for Manx shearwaters combining chick feeding and self-maintenance, bimodal foraging trip durations optimise feeding rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4510841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Company of Biologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45108412015-09-03 Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model Shoji, Akiko Aris-Brosou, Stéphane Fayet, Annette Padget, Oliver Perrins, Christopher Guilford, Tim J Exp Biol Research Article The optimal allocation of time and energy between one's own survival and offspring survival is critical for iteroparous animals, but creates a conflict between what maximises the parent's fitness and what maximises fitness of the offspring. For central-place foragers, provisioning strategies may reflect this allocation, while the distance between central-places and foraging areas may influence the decision. Nevertheless, few studies have explored the link between life history and foraging in the context of resource allocation. Studying foraging behaviour alongside food load rates to chicks provides a useful system for understanding the foraging decisions made during parent–offspring conflict. Using simultaneously deployed GPS and time–depth recorders, we examined the provisioning strategies in free-living Manx shearwaters Puffinus puffinus, which were caring for young. Our results showed a bimodal pattern, where birds alternate short and long trips. Short trips were associated with higher feeding frequency and larger meals than long trips, suggesting that long trips were performed for self-feeding. Furthermore, most foraging was carried out within 100 km of sea fronts. A simple model based on patch quality and travel time shows that for Manx shearwaters combining chick feeding and self-maintenance, bimodal foraging trip durations optimise feeding rates. The Company of Biologists 2015-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4510841/ /pubmed/25964419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.120626 Text en © 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shoji, Akiko
Aris-Brosou, Stéphane
Fayet, Annette
Padget, Oliver
Perrins, Christopher
Guilford, Tim
Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title_full Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title_fullStr Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title_full_unstemmed Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title_short Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
title_sort dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4510841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25964419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.120626
work_keys_str_mv AT shojiakiko dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel
AT arisbrosoustephane dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel
AT fayetannette dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel
AT padgetoliver dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel
AT perrinschristopher dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel
AT guilfordtim dualforagingandpaircoordinationduringchickprovisioningbymanxshearwatersempiricalevidencesupportedbyasimplemodel