Cargando…

Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan, Fardell, Nicole, Williams, Maria, Fraser-Bell, Samantha, Campain, Anna, Gillies, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6
_version_ 1782382299998846976
author Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan
Fardell, Nicole
Williams, Maria
Fraser-Bell, Samantha
Campain, Anna
Gillies, Mark
author_facet Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan
Fardell, Nicole
Williams, Maria
Fraser-Bell, Samantha
Campain, Anna
Gillies, Mark
author_sort Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and the appropriate use of services. We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical trials for retinal diseases at the Sydney Eye Hospital. METHODS: The study was undertaken at the research clinic of the major public quaternary eye hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A 37-question survey was conducted on patients enrolled in or who had finished a clinical trial for macular disease in the 12 months preceding this study in November 2012. Patient satisfaction was assessed using close-ended, multiple choice questions. First, the decision making process for entering into the clinical trial was evaluated. Then the level of patient understanding and experience during the study was assessed. Finally, there was a series of questions to gauge the participants’ perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the majority of patients stating they would recommend participation in a retinal clinical trial (94 %) and participate in a subsequent trial (78 %). Most patients rated themselves as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial. Patients felt well informed and expectations were generally felt to be met, however 14 % did not believe that they could withdraw from the study voluntarily. The most common reasons for trial participation were to contribute to medical science and to have improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients generally found participation in retinal clinical trials to be a positive experience. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction mainly related to inconvenience experienced by transportation and waiting times. We also found that patients felt well informed about the study, but some did not have a complete understanding of their rights, which had been communicated to them when they entered the study. There were both altruistic and self-motivated reasons behind patients’ decisions to join a retinal trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4511246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45112462015-07-23 Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan Fardell, Nicole Williams, Maria Fraser-Bell, Samantha Campain, Anna Gillies, Mark BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and the appropriate use of services. We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical trials for retinal diseases at the Sydney Eye Hospital. METHODS: The study was undertaken at the research clinic of the major public quaternary eye hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A 37-question survey was conducted on patients enrolled in or who had finished a clinical trial for macular disease in the 12 months preceding this study in November 2012. Patient satisfaction was assessed using close-ended, multiple choice questions. First, the decision making process for entering into the clinical trial was evaluated. Then the level of patient understanding and experience during the study was assessed. Finally, there was a series of questions to gauge the participants’ perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the majority of patients stating they would recommend participation in a retinal clinical trial (94 %) and participate in a subsequent trial (78 %). Most patients rated themselves as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial. Patients felt well informed and expectations were generally felt to be met, however 14 % did not believe that they could withdraw from the study voluntarily. The most common reasons for trial participation were to contribute to medical science and to have improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients generally found participation in retinal clinical trials to be a positive experience. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction mainly related to inconvenience experienced by transportation and waiting times. We also found that patients felt well informed about the study, but some did not have a complete understanding of their rights, which had been communicated to them when they entered the study. There were both altruistic and self-motivated reasons behind patients’ decisions to join a retinal trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4511246/ /pubmed/26202164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6 Text en © Au et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan
Fardell, Nicole
Williams, Maria
Fraser-Bell, Samantha
Campain, Anna
Gillies, Mark
Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title_full Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title_short Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
title_sort patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6
work_keys_str_mv AT aucherylpuiyan patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy
AT fardellnicole patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy
AT williamsmaria patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy
AT fraserbellsamantha patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy
AT campainanna patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy
AT gilliesmark patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy