Cargando…
Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6 |
_version_ | 1782382299998846976 |
---|---|
author | Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan Fardell, Nicole Williams, Maria Fraser-Bell, Samantha Campain, Anna Gillies, Mark |
author_facet | Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan Fardell, Nicole Williams, Maria Fraser-Bell, Samantha Campain, Anna Gillies, Mark |
author_sort | Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and the appropriate use of services. We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical trials for retinal diseases at the Sydney Eye Hospital. METHODS: The study was undertaken at the research clinic of the major public quaternary eye hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A 37-question survey was conducted on patients enrolled in or who had finished a clinical trial for macular disease in the 12 months preceding this study in November 2012. Patient satisfaction was assessed using close-ended, multiple choice questions. First, the decision making process for entering into the clinical trial was evaluated. Then the level of patient understanding and experience during the study was assessed. Finally, there was a series of questions to gauge the participants’ perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the majority of patients stating they would recommend participation in a retinal clinical trial (94 %) and participate in a subsequent trial (78 %). Most patients rated themselves as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial. Patients felt well informed and expectations were generally felt to be met, however 14 % did not believe that they could withdraw from the study voluntarily. The most common reasons for trial participation were to contribute to medical science and to have improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients generally found participation in retinal clinical trials to be a positive experience. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction mainly related to inconvenience experienced by transportation and waiting times. We also found that patients felt well informed about the study, but some did not have a complete understanding of their rights, which had been communicated to them when they entered the study. There were both altruistic and self-motivated reasons behind patients’ decisions to join a retinal trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4511246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45112462015-07-23 Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan Fardell, Nicole Williams, Maria Fraser-Bell, Samantha Campain, Anna Gillies, Mark BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care recognizes the obligation to understand and meet patient’s expectations. An individual’s satisfaction has been found to affect health-related decisions and treatment-related behaviours, which in turn affect medical compliance, follow-up, the success of treatment and the appropriate use of services. We studied the expectations, experiences and satisfaction of patients who participated in clinical trials for retinal diseases at the Sydney Eye Hospital. METHODS: The study was undertaken at the research clinic of the major public quaternary eye hospital in New South Wales, Australia. A 37-question survey was conducted on patients enrolled in or who had finished a clinical trial for macular disease in the 12 months preceding this study in November 2012. Patient satisfaction was assessed using close-ended, multiple choice questions. First, the decision making process for entering into the clinical trial was evaluated. Then the level of patient understanding and experience during the study was assessed. Finally, there was a series of questions to gauge the participants’ perception of trial outcomes and overall impression gained from the experience. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction was high with the majority of patients stating they would recommend participation in a retinal clinical trial (94 %) and participate in a subsequent trial (78 %). Most patients rated themselves as the most important factor in making the decision to join a trial. Patients felt well informed and expectations were generally felt to be met, however 14 % did not believe that they could withdraw from the study voluntarily. The most common reasons for trial participation were to contribute to medical science and to have improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients generally found participation in retinal clinical trials to be a positive experience. Factors contributing to dissatisfaction mainly related to inconvenience experienced by transportation and waiting times. We also found that patients felt well informed about the study, but some did not have a complete understanding of their rights, which had been communicated to them when they entered the study. There were both altruistic and self-motivated reasons behind patients’ decisions to join a retinal trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4511246/ /pubmed/26202164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6 Text en © Au et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Au, Cheryl Pui-Yan Fardell, Nicole Williams, Maria Fraser-Bell, Samantha Campain, Anna Gillies, Mark Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title | Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aucherylpuiyan patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy AT fardellnicole patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy AT williamsmaria patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy AT fraserbellsamantha patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy AT campainanna patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy AT gilliesmark patientexperiencesinretinaltrialsacrosssectionalstudy |