Cargando…

A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis

INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pascal, Zufferey, Valcov, Roxana, Fabreguet, Isabelle, Dumusc, Alexandre, Omoumi, Patrick, So, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7
_version_ 1782382334187667456
author Pascal, Zufferey
Valcov, Roxana
Fabreguet, Isabelle
Dumusc, Alexandre
Omoumi, Patrick
So, Alexander
author_facet Pascal, Zufferey
Valcov, Roxana
Fabreguet, Isabelle
Dumusc, Alexandre
Omoumi, Patrick
So, Alexander
author_sort Pascal, Zufferey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies have been performed. METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients who presented an acute arthritis of suspected microcrystalline arthritis were prospectively included. All underwent an US of the symptomatic joints(s) and of knees, ankles and 1(st) metatarsopalangeal (MTP) joints by a rheumatologist “blinded” to the clinical history. 92 also had standard X-rays. Crystal identification was the gold standard. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had MSU, 28 CPP and 9 had both crystals by microscopic analysis. No crystals were detected in 21. One had septic arthritis. Based on US signs in the symptomatic joint, the sensitivity of US for both gout and CPP was low (60 % for both). In gout, the presence of US signs in the symptomatic joint was highly predictive of the diagnosis (PPV = 92 %). When US diagnosis was based on an examination of multiple joints, the sensitivity for both gout and CPP rose significantly but the specificity and the PPV decreased. In the absence of US signs in all the joints studied, CPP arthritis was unlikely (NPV = 87 %) particularly in patients with no previous crisis (NPV = 94 %). X-ray of the symptomatic joints was confirmed to be not useful in diagnosing gout and was equally sensitive or specific as US in CPP arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocenthesis remains the key investigation for the diagnosis of microcrystalline acute arthritis. Although US can help in the diagnostic process, its diagnostic performance is only moderate. US should not be limited to the symptomatic joint. Examination of multiple joints gives a better diagnostic sensitivity but lower specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4511437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45114372015-07-23 A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis Pascal, Zufferey Valcov, Roxana Fabreguet, Isabelle Dumusc, Alexandre Omoumi, Patrick So, Alexander Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies have been performed. METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients who presented an acute arthritis of suspected microcrystalline arthritis were prospectively included. All underwent an US of the symptomatic joints(s) and of knees, ankles and 1(st) metatarsopalangeal (MTP) joints by a rheumatologist “blinded” to the clinical history. 92 also had standard X-rays. Crystal identification was the gold standard. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had MSU, 28 CPP and 9 had both crystals by microscopic analysis. No crystals were detected in 21. One had septic arthritis. Based on US signs in the symptomatic joint, the sensitivity of US for both gout and CPP was low (60 % for both). In gout, the presence of US signs in the symptomatic joint was highly predictive of the diagnosis (PPV = 92 %). When US diagnosis was based on an examination of multiple joints, the sensitivity for both gout and CPP rose significantly but the specificity and the PPV decreased. In the absence of US signs in all the joints studied, CPP arthritis was unlikely (NPV = 87 %) particularly in patients with no previous crisis (NPV = 94 %). X-ray of the symptomatic joints was confirmed to be not useful in diagnosing gout and was equally sensitive or specific as US in CPP arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocenthesis remains the key investigation for the diagnosis of microcrystalline acute arthritis. Although US can help in the diagnostic process, its diagnostic performance is only moderate. US should not be limited to the symptomatic joint. Examination of multiple joints gives a better diagnostic sensitivity but lower specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4511437/ /pubmed/26198435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7 Text en © Pascal et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pascal, Zufferey
Valcov, Roxana
Fabreguet, Isabelle
Dumusc, Alexandre
Omoumi, Patrick
So, Alexander
A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title_full A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title_short A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
title_sort prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pascalzufferey aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT valcovroxana aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT fabreguetisabelle aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT dumuscalexandre aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT omoumipatrick aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT soalexander aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT pascalzufferey prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT valcovroxana prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT fabreguetisabelle prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT dumuscalexandre prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT omoumipatrick prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis
AT soalexander prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis