Cargando…
A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis
INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7 |
_version_ | 1782382334187667456 |
---|---|
author | Pascal, Zufferey Valcov, Roxana Fabreguet, Isabelle Dumusc, Alexandre Omoumi, Patrick So, Alexander |
author_facet | Pascal, Zufferey Valcov, Roxana Fabreguet, Isabelle Dumusc, Alexandre Omoumi, Patrick So, Alexander |
author_sort | Pascal, Zufferey |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies have been performed. METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients who presented an acute arthritis of suspected microcrystalline arthritis were prospectively included. All underwent an US of the symptomatic joints(s) and of knees, ankles and 1(st) metatarsopalangeal (MTP) joints by a rheumatologist “blinded” to the clinical history. 92 also had standard X-rays. Crystal identification was the gold standard. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had MSU, 28 CPP and 9 had both crystals by microscopic analysis. No crystals were detected in 21. One had septic arthritis. Based on US signs in the symptomatic joint, the sensitivity of US for both gout and CPP was low (60 % for both). In gout, the presence of US signs in the symptomatic joint was highly predictive of the diagnosis (PPV = 92 %). When US diagnosis was based on an examination of multiple joints, the sensitivity for both gout and CPP rose significantly but the specificity and the PPV decreased. In the absence of US signs in all the joints studied, CPP arthritis was unlikely (NPV = 87 %) particularly in patients with no previous crisis (NPV = 94 %). X-ray of the symptomatic joints was confirmed to be not useful in diagnosing gout and was equally sensitive or specific as US in CPP arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocenthesis remains the key investigation for the diagnosis of microcrystalline acute arthritis. Although US can help in the diagnostic process, its diagnostic performance is only moderate. US should not be limited to the symptomatic joint. Examination of multiple joints gives a better diagnostic sensitivity but lower specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4511437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45114372015-07-23 A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis Pascal, Zufferey Valcov, Roxana Fabreguet, Isabelle Dumusc, Alexandre Omoumi, Patrick So, Alexander Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: The performance of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of acute gouty (MSU) arthritis and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) arthritis is not yet well defined. Most studies evaluated US as the basis for diagnosing crystal arthritis in already diagnosed cases of gout and few prospective studies have been performed. METHODS: One hundred nine consecutive patients who presented an acute arthritis of suspected microcrystalline arthritis were prospectively included. All underwent an US of the symptomatic joints(s) and of knees, ankles and 1(st) metatarsopalangeal (MTP) joints by a rheumatologist “blinded” to the clinical history. 92 also had standard X-rays. Crystal identification was the gold standard. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had MSU, 28 CPP and 9 had both crystals by microscopic analysis. No crystals were detected in 21. One had septic arthritis. Based on US signs in the symptomatic joint, the sensitivity of US for both gout and CPP was low (60 % for both). In gout, the presence of US signs in the symptomatic joint was highly predictive of the diagnosis (PPV = 92 %). When US diagnosis was based on an examination of multiple joints, the sensitivity for both gout and CPP rose significantly but the specificity and the PPV decreased. In the absence of US signs in all the joints studied, CPP arthritis was unlikely (NPV = 87 %) particularly in patients with no previous crisis (NPV = 94 %). X-ray of the symptomatic joints was confirmed to be not useful in diagnosing gout and was equally sensitive or specific as US in CPP arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrocenthesis remains the key investigation for the diagnosis of microcrystalline acute arthritis. Although US can help in the diagnostic process, its diagnostic performance is only moderate. US should not be limited to the symptomatic joint. Examination of multiple joints gives a better diagnostic sensitivity but lower specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4511437/ /pubmed/26198435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7 Text en © Pascal et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pascal, Zufferey Valcov, Roxana Fabreguet, Isabelle Dumusc, Alexandre Omoumi, Patrick So, Alexander A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title | A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title_full | A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title_fullStr | A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title_short | A prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in acute microcrystalline arthritis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26198435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0701-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pascalzufferey aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT valcovroxana aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT fabreguetisabelle aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT dumuscalexandre aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT omoumipatrick aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT soalexander aprospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT pascalzufferey prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT valcovroxana prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT fabreguetisabelle prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT dumuscalexandre prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT omoumipatrick prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis AT soalexander prospectiveevaluationofultrasoundasadiagnostictoolinacutemicrocrystallinearthritis |