Cargando…
Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to summarize the global predicting role of hormone receptors for survival in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified and assessed for quality through multiple search strategies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall survival (O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0619-1 |
_version_ | 1782382336080347136 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yanli Zhao, Dong Gong, Changguo Zhang, Fengmei He, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yulan Sun, Jing |
author_facet | Zhang, Yanli Zhao, Dong Gong, Changguo Zhang, Fengmei He, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yulan Sun, Jing |
author_sort | Zhang, Yanli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to summarize the global predicting role of hormone receptors for survival in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified and assessed for quality through multiple search strategies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with those in patients with lower levels. The combined hazard ratios of ER, PR, and HER2 for survival were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 98 studies were included for meta-analysis (44 for ER, 38 for PR, and 16 for HER2). Higher levels of either ER or PR could significantly indicate better survival. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of ER for OS, CSS, and PFS were 0.75 (95 % CI, 0.68–0.83), 0.45 (95 % CI, 0.33–0.62), and 0.66 (95 % CI, 0.52–0.85), respectively. The combined HRs of PR for OS, CSS, and PFS reached 0.63 (95 % CI, 0.56–0.71), 0.62 (95 % CI, 0.42–0.93), and 0.45 (95 % CI, 0.30–0.68), respectively. In contrast, elevated levels of HER2 could predict worse outcome with a HR of 1.98 (95 % CI, 1.49–2.62) for OS, and a HR of 2.26 (95 % CI, 1.57–3.25) for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endometrial cancer, higher level of ER and PR predicted favorable survival, and increased level of HER2 was associated with poorer survival. All of the three hormone receptors had prognostic value for survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4511445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45114452015-07-23 Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yanli Zhao, Dong Gong, Changguo Zhang, Fengmei He, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yulan Sun, Jing World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to summarize the global predicting role of hormone receptors for survival in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified and assessed for quality through multiple search strategies. Data were collected from studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with elevated levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with those in patients with lower levels. The combined hazard ratios of ER, PR, and HER2 for survival were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 98 studies were included for meta-analysis (44 for ER, 38 for PR, and 16 for HER2). Higher levels of either ER or PR could significantly indicate better survival. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of ER for OS, CSS, and PFS were 0.75 (95 % CI, 0.68–0.83), 0.45 (95 % CI, 0.33–0.62), and 0.66 (95 % CI, 0.52–0.85), respectively. The combined HRs of PR for OS, CSS, and PFS reached 0.63 (95 % CI, 0.56–0.71), 0.62 (95 % CI, 0.42–0.93), and 0.45 (95 % CI, 0.30–0.68), respectively. In contrast, elevated levels of HER2 could predict worse outcome with a HR of 1.98 (95 % CI, 1.49–2.62) for OS, and a HR of 2.26 (95 % CI, 1.57–3.25) for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endometrial cancer, higher level of ER and PR predicted favorable survival, and increased level of HER2 was associated with poorer survival. All of the three hormone receptors had prognostic value for survival. BioMed Central 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4511445/ /pubmed/26108802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0619-1 Text en © Zhang et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Yanli Zhao, Dong Gong, Changguo Zhang, Fengmei He, Jing Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yulan Sun, Jing Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0619-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyanli prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaodong prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gongchangguo prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangfengmei prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hejing prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwei prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaoyulan prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunjing prognosticroleofhormonereceptorsinendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |