Cargando…

Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort

BACKGROUND: Multiple economic factors and social relationships determine dietary behaviours, but the inter-relations between determinants is unknown. Whether women and men differ in the vulnerability to, and impact of, combined disadvantages is also unclear. We examined associations between diverse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conklin, Annalijn I., Forouhi, Nita G., Surtees, Paul, Wareham, Nicholas J., Monsivais, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1895-y
_version_ 1782382345317253120
author Conklin, Annalijn I.
Forouhi, Nita G.
Surtees, Paul
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
author_facet Conklin, Annalijn I.
Forouhi, Nita G.
Surtees, Paul
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
author_sort Conklin, Annalijn I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple economic factors and social relationships determine dietary behaviours, but the inter-relations between determinants is unknown. Whether women and men differ in the vulnerability to, and impact of, combined disadvantages is also unclear. We examined associations between diverse combinations of economic resources and social relationships, and healthy eating in British older women and men. METHODS: Our sample comprised 9,580 over-50s (47 % of over-50 respondents) in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study. We examined six economic factors (education, social class, home-ownership, money for needs, frequency of insufficient money for food/clothing, paying bills) and three social relationships (marital status, living arrangement and friend contact), independently and in combination, in relation to fruit variety and vegetable variety. We analysed gender-specific associations using multivariable linear regression with interaction terms. RESULTS: Lower social class, lower education, and difficulty paying bills were associated with lower fruit and vegetable variety in both genders, independent of social relationships. All social relationships were independently associated with fruit variety in men and with vegetable variety in both genders. Substantially lower variety was found for all combinations of low economic resources and lack of social relationship than for either measure alone, with men faring worse in the majority of combined disadvantages. For example, the difference in vegetable variety for men reporting low social class and non-married was much greater (β -4.1, [-4.8, -3.4]), than the independent association of low social class (β -1.5, [-1.8,–1.2]), or non-married (β -1.8, [-2.3,–1.3]). Variety was also lower among men with high economic resources but non-married or lone-living. CONCLUSION: A double burden of low economic resources and lack of social relationships suggested they are unique joint determinants, particularly in older men, and that public health efforts to improve healthy eating would offer most benefit to older adults with intersecting economic and social disadvantages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1895-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4511519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45115192015-07-23 Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort Conklin, Annalijn I. Forouhi, Nita G. Surtees, Paul Wareham, Nicholas J. Monsivais, Pablo BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple economic factors and social relationships determine dietary behaviours, but the inter-relations between determinants is unknown. Whether women and men differ in the vulnerability to, and impact of, combined disadvantages is also unclear. We examined associations between diverse combinations of economic resources and social relationships, and healthy eating in British older women and men. METHODS: Our sample comprised 9,580 over-50s (47 % of over-50 respondents) in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study. We examined six economic factors (education, social class, home-ownership, money for needs, frequency of insufficient money for food/clothing, paying bills) and three social relationships (marital status, living arrangement and friend contact), independently and in combination, in relation to fruit variety and vegetable variety. We analysed gender-specific associations using multivariable linear regression with interaction terms. RESULTS: Lower social class, lower education, and difficulty paying bills were associated with lower fruit and vegetable variety in both genders, independent of social relationships. All social relationships were independently associated with fruit variety in men and with vegetable variety in both genders. Substantially lower variety was found for all combinations of low economic resources and lack of social relationship than for either measure alone, with men faring worse in the majority of combined disadvantages. For example, the difference in vegetable variety for men reporting low social class and non-married was much greater (β -4.1, [-4.8, -3.4]), than the independent association of low social class (β -1.5, [-1.8,–1.2]), or non-married (β -1.8, [-2.3,–1.3]). Variety was also lower among men with high economic resources but non-married or lone-living. CONCLUSION: A double burden of low economic resources and lack of social relationships suggested they are unique joint determinants, particularly in older men, and that public health efforts to improve healthy eating would offer most benefit to older adults with intersecting economic and social disadvantages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1895-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4511519/ /pubmed/26199087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1895-y Text en © Conklin et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conklin, Annalijn I.
Forouhi, Nita G.
Surtees, Paul
Wareham, Nicholas J.
Monsivais, Pablo
Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title_full Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title_fullStr Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title_full_unstemmed Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title_short Gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort
title_sort gender and the double burden of economic and social disadvantages on healthy eating: cross-sectional study of older adults in the epic-norfolk cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26199087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1895-y
work_keys_str_mv AT conklinannalijni genderandthedoubleburdenofeconomicandsocialdisadvantagesonhealthyeatingcrosssectionalstudyofolderadultsintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT forouhinitag genderandthedoubleburdenofeconomicandsocialdisadvantagesonhealthyeatingcrosssectionalstudyofolderadultsintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT surteespaul genderandthedoubleburdenofeconomicandsocialdisadvantagesonhealthyeatingcrosssectionalstudyofolderadultsintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT warehamnicholasj genderandthedoubleburdenofeconomicandsocialdisadvantagesonhealthyeatingcrosssectionalstudyofolderadultsintheepicnorfolkcohort
AT monsivaispablo genderandthedoubleburdenofeconomicandsocialdisadvantagesonhealthyeatingcrosssectionalstudyofolderadultsintheepicnorfolkcohort