Cargando…

Quality-of-life assessment among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in Manaus()

OBJECTIVE: this study had the aim of assessing the quality of life among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). For this, the SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires respectively were used to make comparisons with preoperative values. METHODS: a prospective observational cohort study was conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Souza Leão, Marcos George, Santos Santoro, Erika, Lima Avelino, Rafael, Inoue Coutinho, Lucas, Campos Granjeiro, Ronan, Orlando Junior, Nilton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2014.03.017
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: this study had the aim of assessing the quality of life among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). For this, the SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires respectively were used to make comparisons with preoperative values. METHODS: a prospective observational cohort study was conducted, with blinded analysis on the results from 107 TKAs in 99 patients, between June 2010 and October 2011. The present study included 55 knees/patients, among whom 73% were female and 27% were male. The patients’ mean age was 68 years. The SF-36 and WOMAC questionnaires (which have been validated for the Portuguese language) were applied immediately before and six months after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: the statistical and graphical analyses indicated that the variables presented normal distribution. From the data, it was seen that all the indices underwent positive changes after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: despite the initial morbidity, TKA is a very successful form of treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the knee (i.e. more than two joint compartments affected and/or Ahlback classification greater than 3), from a functional point of view, with improvement of the patients’ quality of life, as confirmed in the present study. This study presented evidence level IV (description of case series), with analysis on the results, without a comparative study.