Cargando…

Effects of Approach-Avoidance Training on the Extinction and Return of Fear Responses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Exposure therapy for anxiety involves confronting a patient with fear-evoking stimuli, a procedure based partially on Pavlovian extinction. Exposure and other extinction-based therapies usually lead to (partial) reduction of fear symptoms, but a substantial number of patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krypotos, Angelos-Miltiadis, Arnaudova, Inna, Effting, Marieke, Kindt, Merel, Beckers, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4511792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26200111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131581
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Exposure therapy for anxiety involves confronting a patient with fear-evoking stimuli, a procedure based partially on Pavlovian extinction. Exposure and other extinction-based therapies usually lead to (partial) reduction of fear symptoms, but a substantial number of patients experience a return of fear after treatment. Here we tested whether the combination of fear extinction with modification of approach-avoidance tendencies using an Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) would result in the further reduction of conditioned fear and/or help prevent return of fear after extinction. METHODS: Two groups of participants underwent a fear acquisition procedure during which pictures of one neutral object were sometimes paired with shock (CS(+)), whereas pictures of another neutral object were not (CS(−)). The next day, in a fear extinction procedure, both objects were presented without shock. During the subsequent joystick AAT, one group primarily pulled CS(+) pictures towards themselves and pushed CS(−) pictures away from themselves; reversed contingencies applied for the other group. RESULTS: Approach training was effective in modifying conditioned action tendencies, with some evidence for transfer to a different approach/avoidance task. No group differences in subjective fear or physiological arousal were found during subsequent post- training and return-of-fear testing. LIMITATIONS: No reliable return-of-fear was observed in either group for either subjective or physiological fear measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that approach training may be of limited value for enhancing the short- and long-term effects of extinction-based interventions.