Cargando…
The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3 |
_version_ | 1782382427356790784 |
---|---|
author | Otter, Simon J. Agalliu, Brunilda Baer, Nicola Hales, Georgie Harvey, Katrina James, Keeley Keating, Richard McConnell, Warren Nelson, Rachel Qureshi, Saddaf Ryan, Steven St. John, Abigail Waddington, Heather Warren, Katie Wong, Duane |
author_facet | Otter, Simon J. Agalliu, Brunilda Baer, Nicola Hales, Georgie Harvey, Katrina James, Keeley Keating, Richard McConnell, Warren Nelson, Rachel Qureshi, Saddaf Ryan, Steven St. John, Abigail Waddington, Heather Warren, Katie Wong, Duane |
author_sort | Otter, Simon J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. METHODS: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. RESULTS: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4512018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45120182015-07-24 The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion Otter, Simon J. Agalliu, Brunilda Baer, Nicola Hales, Georgie Harvey, Katrina James, Keeley Keating, Richard McConnell, Warren Nelson, Rachel Qureshi, Saddaf Ryan, Steven St. John, Abigail Waddington, Heather Warren, Katie Wong, Duane J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. METHODS: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. RESULTS: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4512018/ /pubmed/26207142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3 Text en © Otter et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Otter, Simon J. Agalliu, Brunilda Baer, Nicola Hales, Georgie Harvey, Katrina James, Keeley Keating, Richard McConnell, Warren Nelson, Rachel Qureshi, Saddaf Ryan, Steven St. John, Abigail Waddington, Heather Warren, Katie Wong, Duane The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title | The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title_full | The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title_fullStr | The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title_full_unstemmed | The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title_short | The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
title_sort | reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottersimonj thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT agalliubrunilda thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT baernicola thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT halesgeorgie thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT harveykatrina thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT jameskeeley thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT keatingrichard thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT mcconnellwarren thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT nelsonrachel thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT qureshisaddaf thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT ryansteven thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT stjohnabigail thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT waddingtonheather thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT warrenkatie thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT wongduane thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT ottersimonj reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT agalliubrunilda reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT baernicola reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT halesgeorgie reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT harveykatrina reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT jameskeeley reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT keatingrichard reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT mcconnellwarren reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT nelsonrachel reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT qureshisaddaf reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT ryansteven reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT stjohnabigail reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT waddingtonheather reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT warrenkatie reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion AT wongduane reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion |