Cargando…

The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion

BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otter, Simon J., Agalliu, Brunilda, Baer, Nicola, Hales, Georgie, Harvey, Katrina, James, Keeley, Keating, Richard, McConnell, Warren, Nelson, Rachel, Qureshi, Saddaf, Ryan, Steven, St. John, Abigail, Waddington, Heather, Warren, Katie, Wong, Duane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3
_version_ 1782382427356790784
author Otter, Simon J.
Agalliu, Brunilda
Baer, Nicola
Hales, Georgie
Harvey, Katrina
James, Keeley
Keating, Richard
McConnell, Warren
Nelson, Rachel
Qureshi, Saddaf
Ryan, Steven
St. John, Abigail
Waddington, Heather
Warren, Katie
Wong, Duane
author_facet Otter, Simon J.
Agalliu, Brunilda
Baer, Nicola
Hales, Georgie
Harvey, Katrina
James, Keeley
Keating, Richard
McConnell, Warren
Nelson, Rachel
Qureshi, Saddaf
Ryan, Steven
St. John, Abigail
Waddington, Heather
Warren, Katie
Wong, Duane
author_sort Otter, Simon J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. METHODS: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. RESULTS: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45120182015-07-24 The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion Otter, Simon J. Agalliu, Brunilda Baer, Nicola Hales, Georgie Harvey, Katrina James, Keeley Keating, Richard McConnell, Warren Nelson, Rachel Qureshi, Saddaf Ryan, Steven St. John, Abigail Waddington, Heather Warren, Katie Wong, Duane J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. METHODS: Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. RESULTS: For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r = 0.399, p < 0.001). For passive range of motion, the mean total range of dorsiflexion motion (from maximum plantarflexed position to maximum dorsiflexed position) was 82.8° (SD 12.2) for the UG and 82.9° (SD 11.3) for the Dr G application. Both instruments demonstrated high levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4512018/ /pubmed/26207142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3 Text en © Otter et al. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Otter, Simon J.
Agalliu, Brunilda
Baer, Nicola
Hales, Georgie
Harvey, Katrina
James, Keeley
Keating, Richard
McConnell, Warren
Nelson, Rachel
Qureshi, Saddaf
Ryan, Steven
St. John, Abigail
Waddington, Heather
Warren, Katie
Wong, Duane
The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title_full The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title_fullStr The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title_short The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
title_sort reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0088-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ottersimonj thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT agalliubrunilda thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT baernicola thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT halesgeorgie thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT harveykatrina thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT jameskeeley thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT keatingrichard thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT mcconnellwarren thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT nelsonrachel thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT qureshisaddaf thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT ryansteven thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT stjohnabigail thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT waddingtonheather thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT warrenkatie thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT wongduane thereliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT ottersimonj reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT agalliubrunilda reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT baernicola reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT halesgeorgie reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT harveykatrina reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT jameskeeley reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT keatingrichard reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT mcconnellwarren reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT nelsonrachel reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT qureshisaddaf reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT ryansteven reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT stjohnabigail reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT waddingtonheather reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT warrenkatie reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion
AT wongduane reliabilityofasmartphonegoniometerapplicationcomparedwithatraditionalgoniometerformeasuringfirstmetatarsophalangealjointdorsiflexion