Cargando…

“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots

Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) may help improve care delivery at home for older adults with cognitive impairment and reduce the burden of informal caregivers. Examining the views of these stakeholders on SAR is fundamental in order to conceive acceptable and useful SAR for dementia care. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pino, Maribel, Boulay, Mélodie, Jouen, François, Rigaud, Anne-Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
_version_ 1782382429175021568
author Pino, Maribel
Boulay, Mélodie
Jouen, François
Rigaud, Anne-Sophie
author_facet Pino, Maribel
Boulay, Mélodie
Jouen, François
Rigaud, Anne-Sophie
author_sort Pino, Maribel
collection PubMed
description Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) may help improve care delivery at home for older adults with cognitive impairment and reduce the burden of informal caregivers. Examining the views of these stakeholders on SAR is fundamental in order to conceive acceptable and useful SAR for dementia care. This study investigated SAR acceptance among three groups of older adults living in the community: persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment, informal caregivers of persons with dementia, and healthy older adults. Different technology acceptance questions related to the robot and user characteristics, potential applications, feelings about technology, ethical issues, and barriers and facilitators for SAR adoption, were addressed in a mixed-method study. Participants (n = 25) completed a survey and took part in a focus group (n = 7). A functional robot prototype, a multimedia presentation, and some use-case scenarios provided a base for the discussion. Content analysis was carried out based on recorded material from focus groups. Results indicated that an accurate insight of influential factors for SAR acceptance could be gained by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants acknowledged the potential benefits of SAR for supporting care at home for individuals with cognitive impairment. In all the three groups, intention to use SAR was found to be lower for the present time than that anticipated for the future. However, caregivers and persons with MCI had a higher perceived usefulness and intention to use SAR, at the present time, than healthy older adults, confirming that current needs are strongly related to technology acceptance and should influence SAR design. A key theme that emerged in this study was the importance of customizing SAR appearance, services, and social capabilities. Mismatch between needs and solutions offered by the robot, usability factors, and lack of experience with technology, were seen as the most important barriers for SAR adoption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45120262015-08-07 “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots Pino, Maribel Boulay, Mélodie Jouen, François Rigaud, Anne-Sophie Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) may help improve care delivery at home for older adults with cognitive impairment and reduce the burden of informal caregivers. Examining the views of these stakeholders on SAR is fundamental in order to conceive acceptable and useful SAR for dementia care. This study investigated SAR acceptance among three groups of older adults living in the community: persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment, informal caregivers of persons with dementia, and healthy older adults. Different technology acceptance questions related to the robot and user characteristics, potential applications, feelings about technology, ethical issues, and barriers and facilitators for SAR adoption, were addressed in a mixed-method study. Participants (n = 25) completed a survey and took part in a focus group (n = 7). A functional robot prototype, a multimedia presentation, and some use-case scenarios provided a base for the discussion. Content analysis was carried out based on recorded material from focus groups. Results indicated that an accurate insight of influential factors for SAR acceptance could be gained by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants acknowledged the potential benefits of SAR for supporting care at home for individuals with cognitive impairment. In all the three groups, intention to use SAR was found to be lower for the present time than that anticipated for the future. However, caregivers and persons with MCI had a higher perceived usefulness and intention to use SAR, at the present time, than healthy older adults, confirming that current needs are strongly related to technology acceptance and should influence SAR design. A key theme that emerged in this study was the importance of customizing SAR appearance, services, and social capabilities. Mismatch between needs and solutions offered by the robot, usability factors, and lack of experience with technology, were seen as the most important barriers for SAR adoption. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4512026/ /pubmed/26257646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pino, Boulay, Jouen and Rigaud. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pino, Maribel
Boulay, Mélodie
Jouen, François
Rigaud, Anne-Sophie
“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title_full “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title_fullStr “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title_full_unstemmed “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title_short “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
title_sort “are we ready for robots that care for us?” attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26257646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
work_keys_str_mv AT pinomaribel arewereadyforrobotsthatcareforusattitudesandopinionsofolderadultstowardsociallyassistiverobots
AT boulaymelodie arewereadyforrobotsthatcareforusattitudesandopinionsofolderadultstowardsociallyassistiverobots
AT jouenfrancois arewereadyforrobotsthatcareforusattitudesandopinionsofolderadultstowardsociallyassistiverobots
AT rigaudannesophie arewereadyforrobotsthatcareforusattitudesandopinionsofolderadultstowardsociallyassistiverobots