Cargando…

Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry

Radiotherapy is one of the main approaches to cure prostate cancer, and its success depends on the accuracy of dose planning. A complicating factor is the presence of a metallic prosthesis in the femur and pelvis, which is becoming more common in elderly populations. The goal of this work was to per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alves, G.G., Kinoshita, A., de Oliveira, H.F., Guimarães, F.S., Amaral, L.L., Baffa, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20154367
_version_ 1782382447010250752
author Alves, G.G.
Kinoshita, A.
de Oliveira, H.F.
Guimarães, F.S.
Amaral, L.L.
Baffa, O.
author_facet Alves, G.G.
Kinoshita, A.
de Oliveira, H.F.
Guimarães, F.S.
Amaral, L.L.
Baffa, O.
author_sort Alves, G.G.
collection PubMed
description Radiotherapy is one of the main approaches to cure prostate cancer, and its success depends on the accuracy of dose planning. A complicating factor is the presence of a metallic prosthesis in the femur and pelvis, which is becoming more common in elderly populations. The goal of this work was to perform dose measurements to check the accuracy of radiotherapy treatment planning under these complicated conditions. To accomplish this, a scale phantom of an adult pelvic region was used with alanine dosimeters inserted in the prostate region. This phantom was irradiated according to the planned treatment under the following three conditions: with two metallic prostheses in the region of the femur head, with only one prosthesis, and without any prostheses. The combined relative standard uncertainty of dose measurement by electron spin resonance (ESR)/alanine was 5.05%, whereas the combined relative standard uncertainty of the applied dose was 3.35%, resulting in a combined relative standard uncertainty of the whole process of 6.06%. The ESR dosimetry indicated that there was no difference (P>0.05, ANOVA) in dosage between the planned dose and treatments. The results are in the range of the planned dose, within the combined relative uncertainty, demonstrating that the treatment-planning system compensates for the effects caused by the presence of femur and hip metal prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45121042015-08-13 Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry Alves, G.G. Kinoshita, A. de Oliveira, H.F. Guimarães, F.S. Amaral, L.L. Baffa, O. Braz J Med Biol Res Biomedical Sciences Radiotherapy is one of the main approaches to cure prostate cancer, and its success depends on the accuracy of dose planning. A complicating factor is the presence of a metallic prosthesis in the femur and pelvis, which is becoming more common in elderly populations. The goal of this work was to perform dose measurements to check the accuracy of radiotherapy treatment planning under these complicated conditions. To accomplish this, a scale phantom of an adult pelvic region was used with alanine dosimeters inserted in the prostate region. This phantom was irradiated according to the planned treatment under the following three conditions: with two metallic prostheses in the region of the femur head, with only one prosthesis, and without any prostheses. The combined relative standard uncertainty of dose measurement by electron spin resonance (ESR)/alanine was 5.05%, whereas the combined relative standard uncertainty of the applied dose was 3.35%, resulting in a combined relative standard uncertainty of the whole process of 6.06%. The ESR dosimetry indicated that there was no difference (P>0.05, ANOVA) in dosage between the planned dose and treatments. The results are in the range of the planned dose, within the combined relative uncertainty, demonstrating that the treatment-planning system compensates for the effects caused by the presence of femur and hip metal prostheses. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4512104/ /pubmed/26017344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20154367 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Biomedical Sciences
Alves, G.G.
Kinoshita, A.
de Oliveira, H.F.
Guimarães, F.S.
Amaral, L.L.
Baffa, O.
Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title_full Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title_fullStr Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title_short Accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
title_sort accuracy of dose planning for prostate radiotherapy in the presence of metallic implants evaluated by electron spin resonance dosimetry
topic Biomedical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20154367
work_keys_str_mv AT alvesgg accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry
AT kinoshitaa accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry
AT deoliveirahf accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry
AT guimaraesfs accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry
AT amaralll accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry
AT baffao accuracyofdoseplanningforprostateradiotherapyinthepresenceofmetallicimplantsevaluatedbyelectronspinresonancedosimetry