Cargando…

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial

Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Detollenaere, Renée J, den Boon, Jan, Stekelenburg, Jelle, IntHout, Joanna, Vierhout, Mark E, Kluivers, Kirsten B, van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717
_version_ 1782382461088432128
author Detollenaere, Renée J
den Boon, Jan
Stekelenburg, Jelle
IntHout, Joanna
Vierhout, Mark E
Kluivers, Kirsten B
van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F
author_facet Detollenaere, Renée J
den Boon, Jan
Stekelenburg, Jelle
IntHout, Joanna
Vierhout, Mark E
Kluivers, Kirsten B
van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F
author_sort Detollenaere, Renée J
collection PubMed
description Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. Participants 208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery. Interventions Treatment with sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an increase in surgical failure rate of 7%. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was recurrent prolapse stage 2 or higher of the uterus or vaginal vault (apical compartment) evaluated by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in combination with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery for recurrent apical prolapse at 12 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall anatomical recurrences, including recurrent anterior compartment (bladder) and/or posterior compartment (bowel) prolapse, functional outcome, complications, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning. Results Sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior for anatomical recurrence of the apical compartment with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery (n=0, 0%) compared with vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments (n=4, 4.0%, difference −3.9%, 95% confidence interval for difference −8.6% to 0.7%). At 12 months, overall anatomical recurrences, functional outcome, quality of life, complications, hospital stay, measures on postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning did not differ between the two groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during hospital stay. None was considered to be related to the type of surgery. Conclusions Uterus preservation by sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments for surgical failure of the apical compartment at 12 months’ follow-up. Trial registration trialregister.nl NTR1866.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45122032015-07-24 Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial Detollenaere, Renée J den Boon, Jan Stekelenburg, Jelle IntHout, Joanna Vierhout, Mark E Kluivers, Kirsten B van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F BMJ Research Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. Participants 208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery. Interventions Treatment with sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an increase in surgical failure rate of 7%. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was recurrent prolapse stage 2 or higher of the uterus or vaginal vault (apical compartment) evaluated by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in combination with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery for recurrent apical prolapse at 12 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall anatomical recurrences, including recurrent anterior compartment (bladder) and/or posterior compartment (bowel) prolapse, functional outcome, complications, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning. Results Sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior for anatomical recurrence of the apical compartment with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery (n=0, 0%) compared with vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments (n=4, 4.0%, difference −3.9%, 95% confidence interval for difference −8.6% to 0.7%). At 12 months, overall anatomical recurrences, functional outcome, quality of life, complications, hospital stay, measures on postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning did not differ between the two groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during hospital stay. None was considered to be related to the type of surgery. Conclusions Uterus preservation by sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments for surgical failure of the apical compartment at 12 months’ follow-up. Trial registration trialregister.nl NTR1866. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4512203/ /pubmed/26206451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717 Text en © Detollenaere et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Detollenaere, Renée J
den Boon, Jan
Stekelenburg, Jelle
IntHout, Joanna
Vierhout, Mark E
Kluivers, Kirsten B
van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title_full Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title_short Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
title_sort sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717
work_keys_str_mv AT detollenaerereneej sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT denboonjan sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT stekelenburgjelle sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT inthoutjoanna sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT vierhoutmarke sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT kluiverskirstenb sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT vaneijndhovenhugowf sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial