Cargando…
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial
Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717 |
_version_ | 1782382461088432128 |
---|---|
author | Detollenaere, Renée J den Boon, Jan Stekelenburg, Jelle IntHout, Joanna Vierhout, Mark E Kluivers, Kirsten B van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F |
author_facet | Detollenaere, Renée J den Boon, Jan Stekelenburg, Jelle IntHout, Joanna Vierhout, Mark E Kluivers, Kirsten B van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F |
author_sort | Detollenaere, Renée J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. Participants 208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery. Interventions Treatment with sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an increase in surgical failure rate of 7%. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was recurrent prolapse stage 2 or higher of the uterus or vaginal vault (apical compartment) evaluated by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in combination with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery for recurrent apical prolapse at 12 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall anatomical recurrences, including recurrent anterior compartment (bladder) and/or posterior compartment (bowel) prolapse, functional outcome, complications, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning. Results Sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior for anatomical recurrence of the apical compartment with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery (n=0, 0%) compared with vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments (n=4, 4.0%, difference −3.9%, 95% confidence interval for difference −8.6% to 0.7%). At 12 months, overall anatomical recurrences, functional outcome, quality of life, complications, hospital stay, measures on postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning did not differ between the two groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during hospital stay. None was considered to be related to the type of surgery. Conclusions Uterus preservation by sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments for surgical failure of the apical compartment at 12 months’ follow-up. Trial registration trialregister.nl NTR1866. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4512203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45122032015-07-24 Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial Detollenaere, Renée J den Boon, Jan Stekelenburg, Jelle IntHout, Joanna Vierhout, Mark E Kluivers, Kirsten B van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F BMJ Research Objective To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. Design Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. Setting 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. Participants 208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery. Interventions Treatment with sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an increase in surgical failure rate of 7%. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was recurrent prolapse stage 2 or higher of the uterus or vaginal vault (apical compartment) evaluated by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in combination with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery for recurrent apical prolapse at 12 months’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall anatomical recurrences, including recurrent anterior compartment (bladder) and/or posterior compartment (bowel) prolapse, functional outcome, complications, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning. Results Sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior for anatomical recurrence of the apical compartment with bothersome bulge symptoms or repeat surgery (n=0, 0%) compared with vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments (n=4, 4.0%, difference −3.9%, 95% confidence interval for difference −8.6% to 0.7%). At 12 months, overall anatomical recurrences, functional outcome, quality of life, complications, hospital stay, measures on postoperative recovery, and sexual functioning did not differ between the two groups. Five serious adverse events were reported during hospital stay. None was considered to be related to the type of surgery. Conclusions Uterus preservation by sacrospinous hysteropexy was non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments for surgical failure of the apical compartment at 12 months’ follow-up. Trial registration trialregister.nl NTR1866. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4512203/ /pubmed/26206451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717 Text en © Detollenaere et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Detollenaere, Renée J den Boon, Jan Stekelenburg, Jelle IntHout, Joanna Vierhout, Mark E Kluivers, Kirsten B van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title | Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_full | Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_short | Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26206451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detollenaerereneej sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT denboonjan sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT stekelenburgjelle sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT inthoutjoanna sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT vierhoutmarke sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT kluiverskirstenb sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial AT vaneijndhovenhugowf sacrospinoushysteropexyversusvaginalhysterectomywithsuspensionoftheuterosacralligamentsinwomenwithuterineprolapsestage2orhighermulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrial |