Cargando…

Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor

Previous studies suggest that diabetes impairs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In this study, we tested whether the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor, differently from G-CSF, is effective in mobilizing HSCs in patients with diabetes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadini, Gian Paolo, Fiala, Mark, Cappellari, Roberta, Danna, Marianna, Park, Soo, Poncina, Nicol, Menegazzo, Lisa, Albiero, Mattia, DiPersio, John, Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith, Avogaro, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804941
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db15-0077
_version_ 1782382465152712704
author Fadini, Gian Paolo
Fiala, Mark
Cappellari, Roberta
Danna, Marianna
Park, Soo
Poncina, Nicol
Menegazzo, Lisa
Albiero, Mattia
DiPersio, John
Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
Avogaro, Angelo
author_facet Fadini, Gian Paolo
Fiala, Mark
Cappellari, Roberta
Danna, Marianna
Park, Soo
Poncina, Nicol
Menegazzo, Lisa
Albiero, Mattia
DiPersio, John
Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
Avogaro, Angelo
author_sort Fadini, Gian Paolo
collection PubMed
description Previous studies suggest that diabetes impairs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In this study, we tested whether the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor, differently from G-CSF, is effective in mobilizing HSCs in patients with diabetes. In a prospective study, individuals with and without diabetes (n = 10/group) were administered plerixafor to compare CD34(+) HSC mobilization; plerixafor was equally able to mobilize CD34(+) HSCs in the two groups, whereas in historical data, G-CSF was less effective in patients with diabetes. In a retrospective autologous transplantation study conducted on 706 patients, diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF with/without chemotherapy, whereas it was not in patients who received G-CSF plus plerixafor. Similarly in an allogeneic transplantation study (n = 335), diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF. Patients with diabetes who received G-CSF without plerixafor had a lower probability of reaching >50/μL CD34(+) HSCs, independent from confounding variables. In conclusion, diabetes negatively impacted HSC mobilization after G-CSF with or without chemotherapy but had no effect on mobilization induced by G-CSF with plerixafor. This finding has major implications for the care of patients with diabetes undergoing stem cell mobilization and transplantation and for the vascular regenerative potential of bone marrow stem cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45122292016-08-01 Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor Fadini, Gian Paolo Fiala, Mark Cappellari, Roberta Danna, Marianna Park, Soo Poncina, Nicol Menegazzo, Lisa Albiero, Mattia DiPersio, John Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith Avogaro, Angelo Diabetes Complications Previous studies suggest that diabetes impairs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In this study, we tested whether the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor, differently from G-CSF, is effective in mobilizing HSCs in patients with diabetes. In a prospective study, individuals with and without diabetes (n = 10/group) were administered plerixafor to compare CD34(+) HSC mobilization; plerixafor was equally able to mobilize CD34(+) HSCs in the two groups, whereas in historical data, G-CSF was less effective in patients with diabetes. In a retrospective autologous transplantation study conducted on 706 patients, diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF with/without chemotherapy, whereas it was not in patients who received G-CSF plus plerixafor. Similarly in an allogeneic transplantation study (n = 335), diabetes was associated with poorer mobilization in patients who received G-CSF. Patients with diabetes who received G-CSF without plerixafor had a lower probability of reaching >50/μL CD34(+) HSCs, independent from confounding variables. In conclusion, diabetes negatively impacted HSC mobilization after G-CSF with or without chemotherapy but had no effect on mobilization induced by G-CSF with plerixafor. This finding has major implications for the care of patients with diabetes undergoing stem cell mobilization and transplantation and for the vascular regenerative potential of bone marrow stem cells. American Diabetes Association 2015-08 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4512229/ /pubmed/25804941 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db15-0077 Text en © 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.
spellingShingle Complications
Fadini, Gian Paolo
Fiala, Mark
Cappellari, Roberta
Danna, Marianna
Park, Soo
Poncina, Nicol
Menegazzo, Lisa
Albiero, Mattia
DiPersio, John
Stockerl-Goldstein, Keith
Avogaro, Angelo
Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title_full Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title_fullStr Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title_short Diabetes Limits Stem Cell Mobilization Following G-CSF but Not Plerixafor
title_sort diabetes limits stem cell mobilization following g-csf but not plerixafor
topic Complications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804941
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db15-0077
work_keys_str_mv AT fadinigianpaolo diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT fialamark diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT cappellariroberta diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT dannamarianna diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT parksoo diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT poncinanicol diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT menegazzolisa diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT albieromattia diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT dipersiojohn diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT stockerlgoldsteinkeith diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor
AT avogaroangelo diabeteslimitsstemcellmobilizationfollowinggcsfbutnotplerixafor