Cargando…
Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1 |
_version_ | 1782382527432884224 |
---|---|
author | Lems, Willem F. Saag, Kenneth |
author_facet | Lems, Willem F. Saag, Kenneth |
author_sort | Lems, Willem F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes play a consistent and crucial role in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO), while changes in bone resorption during GC-use are variable. To prevent fractures, important general measures include using the lowest possible dose of GCs, treating the underlying disease adequately, a healthy life style, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and regular exercise. Although it has been shown that bisphosphonates reduce vertebral fractures during the first 2 years of GC-treatment, there are no data on long-term use of bisphosphonates during GC-treatment. Of some concern in GIO, bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, including bone formation, which is already downregulated by GCs. In contrast, the use of the anabolic agent teriparatide is more effective in reducing vertebral fractures than alendronate. In summary, bisphosphonates remain the first choice in the first two years of treatment in GC-treated patients with high fracture risk, but their long-term effects on bone quality and fracture risk reduction remain uncertain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4512570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45125702015-07-24 Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons Lems, Willem F. Saag, Kenneth Endocrine Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes play a consistent and crucial role in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO), while changes in bone resorption during GC-use are variable. To prevent fractures, important general measures include using the lowest possible dose of GCs, treating the underlying disease adequately, a healthy life style, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and regular exercise. Although it has been shown that bisphosphonates reduce vertebral fractures during the first 2 years of GC-treatment, there are no data on long-term use of bisphosphonates during GC-treatment. Of some concern in GIO, bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, including bone formation, which is already downregulated by GCs. In contrast, the use of the anabolic agent teriparatide is more effective in reducing vertebral fractures than alendronate. In summary, bisphosphonates remain the first choice in the first two years of treatment in GC-treated patients with high fracture risk, but their long-term effects on bone quality and fracture risk reduction remain uncertain. Springer US 2015-06-04 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4512570/ /pubmed/26041376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice Lems, Willem F. Saag, Kenneth Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title_full | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title_fullStr | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title_full_unstemmed | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title_short | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
title_sort | bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons |
topic | Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemswillemf bisphosphonatesandglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosiscons AT saagkenneth bisphosphonatesandglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosiscons |