Cargando…

Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons

During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lems, Willem F., Saag, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1
_version_ 1782382527432884224
author Lems, Willem F.
Saag, Kenneth
author_facet Lems, Willem F.
Saag, Kenneth
author_sort Lems, Willem F.
collection PubMed
description During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes play a consistent and crucial role in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO), while changes in bone resorption during GC-use are variable. To prevent fractures, important general measures include using the lowest possible dose of GCs, treating the underlying disease adequately, a healthy life style, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and regular exercise. Although it has been shown that bisphosphonates reduce vertebral fractures during the first 2 years of GC-treatment, there are no data on long-term use of bisphosphonates during GC-treatment. Of some concern in GIO, bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, including bone formation, which is already downregulated by GCs. In contrast, the use of the anabolic agent teriparatide is more effective in reducing vertebral fractures than alendronate. In summary, bisphosphonates remain the first choice in the first two years of treatment in GC-treated patients with high fracture risk, but their long-term effects on bone quality and fracture risk reduction remain uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45125702015-07-24 Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons Lems, Willem F. Saag, Kenneth Endocrine Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice During the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), both vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk are increased, due to the direct and indirect negative effects of GCs on bone, muscles, and the activity of the underlying inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of bone formation and increased apoptosis of osteocytes play a consistent and crucial role in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO), while changes in bone resorption during GC-use are variable. To prevent fractures, important general measures include using the lowest possible dose of GCs, treating the underlying disease adequately, a healthy life style, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and regular exercise. Although it has been shown that bisphosphonates reduce vertebral fractures during the first 2 years of GC-treatment, there are no data on long-term use of bisphosphonates during GC-treatment. Of some concern in GIO, bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, including bone formation, which is already downregulated by GCs. In contrast, the use of the anabolic agent teriparatide is more effective in reducing vertebral fractures than alendronate. In summary, bisphosphonates remain the first choice in the first two years of treatment in GC-treated patients with high fracture risk, but their long-term effects on bone quality and fracture risk reduction remain uncertain. Springer US 2015-06-04 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4512570/ /pubmed/26041376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice
Lems, Willem F.
Saag, Kenneth
Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title_full Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title_fullStr Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title_full_unstemmed Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title_short Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
title_sort bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: cons
topic Pros and Cons in Endocrine Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0639-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lemswillemf bisphosphonatesandglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosiscons
AT saagkenneth bisphosphonatesandglucocorticoidinducedosteoporosiscons