Cargando…

Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE: Radiolucencies are commonly observed in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients within 1 year of arthroplasty. The objective of the study was to identify how the bone mineral density (BMD) changes up to 1 year post-arthroplasty. METHODS: Dual X-ray absorptiometry scans were obtain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuncer, Mahmut, Patel, Rajesh, Cobb, Justin P., Hansen, Ulrich N., Amis, Andrew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24770381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3014-5
_version_ 1782382527649939456
author Tuncer, Mahmut
Patel, Rajesh
Cobb, Justin P.
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Amis, Andrew A.
author_facet Tuncer, Mahmut
Patel, Rajesh
Cobb, Justin P.
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Amis, Andrew A.
author_sort Tuncer, Mahmut
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radiolucencies are commonly observed in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients within 1 year of arthroplasty. The objective of the study was to identify how the bone mineral density (BMD) changes up to 1 year post-arthroplasty. METHODS: Dual X-ray absorptiometry scans were obtained from 11 UKA patients at 10 days and 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Patients were scanned in both anteroposterior and lateral knee orientations. RESULTS: Most subjects saw a large decline in BMD in the first 6 months following surgery, followed by some recovery in bone mass. The biggest change occurred under the tibial intercondylar eminence, which decreased significantly by an average of 18 % at 6 months and was 15 % at 1 year. The average bone loss under the tibial tray was low; however, the bone loss at the anterior portion was higher with a significant average decrease of 14 %. There was no change in BMD under the tibial keel. There was significant bone loss of 13 % under the femoral component; the regions anterior and posterior to the central femoral implant peg both had significant bone loss of 14 %. The bone response between patients was very variable, with some patients losing bone steadily, and others gaining it rapidly after an early fall. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall reduction in BMD under both components was low, it was significant and there was substantial individual variation superimposed on this. Improving our understanding of this response to surgery may impact on prosthesis survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study: case series with no comparison group, Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45125712015-07-24 Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Tuncer, Mahmut Patel, Rajesh Cobb, Justin P. Hansen, Ulrich N. Amis, Andrew A. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: Radiolucencies are commonly observed in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients within 1 year of arthroplasty. The objective of the study was to identify how the bone mineral density (BMD) changes up to 1 year post-arthroplasty. METHODS: Dual X-ray absorptiometry scans were obtained from 11 UKA patients at 10 days and 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Patients were scanned in both anteroposterior and lateral knee orientations. RESULTS: Most subjects saw a large decline in BMD in the first 6 months following surgery, followed by some recovery in bone mass. The biggest change occurred under the tibial intercondylar eminence, which decreased significantly by an average of 18 % at 6 months and was 15 % at 1 year. The average bone loss under the tibial tray was low; however, the bone loss at the anterior portion was higher with a significant average decrease of 14 %. There was no change in BMD under the tibial keel. There was significant bone loss of 13 % under the femoral component; the regions anterior and posterior to the central femoral implant peg both had significant bone loss of 14 %. The bone response between patients was very variable, with some patients losing bone steadily, and others gaining it rapidly after an early fall. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall reduction in BMD under both components was low, it was significant and there was substantial individual variation superimposed on this. Improving our understanding of this response to surgery may impact on prosthesis survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study: case series with no comparison group, Level IV. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-04-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4512571/ /pubmed/24770381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3014-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Knee
Tuncer, Mahmut
Patel, Rajesh
Cobb, Justin P.
Hansen, Ulrich N.
Amis, Andrew A.
Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title_full Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title_short Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
title_sort variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24770381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3014-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tuncermahmut variablebonemineraldensityreductionspostunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT patelrajesh variablebonemineraldensityreductionspostunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT cobbjustinp variablebonemineraldensityreductionspostunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT hansenulrichn variablebonemineraldensityreductionspostunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT amisandrewa variablebonemineraldensityreductionspostunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty