Cargando…

Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes

Purpose. To examine the relationship between meat intake and insulin resistance (IR) in 292 nondiabetic women. Methods. IR was evaluated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Diet was assessed via 7-day weighed food records. Servings of very lean meat (VLM) and regular meat (meat) were inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Larry A., LeCheminant, James D., Bailey, Bruce W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26240831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174742
_version_ 1782382535133626368
author Tucker, Larry A.
LeCheminant, James D.
Bailey, Bruce W.
author_facet Tucker, Larry A.
LeCheminant, James D.
Bailey, Bruce W.
author_sort Tucker, Larry A.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To examine the relationship between meat intake and insulin resistance (IR) in 292 nondiabetic women. Methods. IR was evaluated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Diet was assessed via 7-day weighed food records. Servings of very lean meat (VLM) and regular meat (meat) were indexed using the ADA Exchange Lists Program. Physical activity was assessed using accelerometers and body fat was measured using the Bod Pod. Results. Meat intake was directly related to HOMA (F = 7.4; P = 0.007). Women with moderate or high meat intakes had significantly higher HOMA levels than their counterparts. Adjusting for body fat weakened the relationship (F = 1.0; P = 0.3201). Odds ratio results showed that the low meat quartile had 67% lower odds of being IR (75th percentile) compared to their counterparts (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.16–0.71). These findings changed little after adjusting for all covariates simultaneously (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14–0.83). Conversely, VLM intake was not related to HOMA, with or without the covariates. Conclusion. Moderate and high meat intakes are associated with increased insulin resistance in nondiabetic women. However, differences in body fat contribute significantly to the relationship. VLM is not predictive of IR. Prudence in the amount and type of meat consumed may be helpful in decreasing the likelihood of IR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4512604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45126042015-08-03 Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes Tucker, Larry A. LeCheminant, James D. Bailey, Bruce W. J Diabetes Res Research Article Purpose. To examine the relationship between meat intake and insulin resistance (IR) in 292 nondiabetic women. Methods. IR was evaluated using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Diet was assessed via 7-day weighed food records. Servings of very lean meat (VLM) and regular meat (meat) were indexed using the ADA Exchange Lists Program. Physical activity was assessed using accelerometers and body fat was measured using the Bod Pod. Results. Meat intake was directly related to HOMA (F = 7.4; P = 0.007). Women with moderate or high meat intakes had significantly higher HOMA levels than their counterparts. Adjusting for body fat weakened the relationship (F = 1.0; P = 0.3201). Odds ratio results showed that the low meat quartile had 67% lower odds of being IR (75th percentile) compared to their counterparts (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.16–0.71). These findings changed little after adjusting for all covariates simultaneously (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.14–0.83). Conversely, VLM intake was not related to HOMA, with or without the covariates. Conclusion. Moderate and high meat intakes are associated with increased insulin resistance in nondiabetic women. However, differences in body fat contribute significantly to the relationship. VLM is not predictive of IR. Prudence in the amount and type of meat consumed may be helpful in decreasing the likelihood of IR. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4512604/ /pubmed/26240831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174742 Text en Copyright © 2015 Larry A. Tucker et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tucker, Larry A.
LeCheminant, James D.
Bailey, Bruce W.
Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title_full Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title_fullStr Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title_short Meat Intake and Insulin Resistance in Women without Type 2 Diabetes
title_sort meat intake and insulin resistance in women without type 2 diabetes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26240831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174742
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerlarrya meatintakeandinsulinresistanceinwomenwithouttype2diabetes
AT lecheminantjamesd meatintakeandinsulinresistanceinwomenwithouttype2diabetes
AT baileybrucew meatintakeandinsulinresistanceinwomenwithouttype2diabetes